Main Edition
US
FR
May 25, 2024 - 12:00pm
When asked to roll-call the achievements from 14 long years in office, even the most fervent Conservative Party activist will struggle. One thing is guaranteed, however: Michael Gove’s school reforms will be near the top of their short list. The veteran MP has announced that he is standing down from his Lib Dem target seat of Surrey Heath at the election, sunsetting a near-20-year Parliamentary career — most of it spent in the Cabinet.
Gove first made his name as a reformer while education secretary early on in David Cameron’s government. Firstly by putting rocket boosters on the late New Labour policy of academising schools, giving them the freedom to innovate by making them independent of local authority control, and secondly by giving schools minister Nick Gibb full backing to revolutionise reading standards by introducing phonics to the curriculum.
Both successful reforms saw Gove rally against “The Blob”, the contemptuous moniker he applied to what he saw as an education sector establishment that opposed just about any change to a soft, fluffy, “learning to learn” teaching philosophy, as opposed to a more direct, “chalkboard” pedagogy. Working with a certain Dominic Cummings as his special advisor until 2014, it would not be the last time that Gove would sail headlong against the prevailing establishment winds.
After loudly rubbing up the education profession the wrong way, Gove was demoted to the whips office by Cameron, who sought a rather quieter set of headlines from the Education Department in the run-up to the 2015 general election. Undeterred by this temporary setback, it didn’t take long for Gove to return to form as justice secretary after the 2015 election. He immediately set about unwinding the unpopular legacy of his predecessor, Chris Grayling — and continued to build on his reputation as one of Whitehall’s most effective ministers.
But Gove’s very strengths of being forthright, cerebral and determined can also be his Achilles heel, reflecting in the mirror as combativeness and head-over-heart politics. Never was this more clearly on display than during the EU referendum campaign, when breaking ranks and rejoining Cummings to become a figurehead at the Vote Leave campaign saw his close friendship with Cameron publicly break down.
Taking a dim view of his antics during the referendum campaign, including brutally capsizing Boris Johnson’s leadership bid, Theresa May booted him out of the Cabinet upon being appointed prime minister. But just like after his last demotion, it didn’t take long for him to bounce back. Severely weakened by the outcome of the 2017 election and in need of both Cabinet talent and political allies, May returned Gove to the fold, where he won over civil servants and the farming community at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs with a more sympathetic and listening ear.
Oscar Wilde said that true friends stab you in the front, and in this spirit Johnson once again invited Gove into Cabinet in 2019 — despite his first Tory leadership bid being publicly nuked by Gove’s eviscerating criticisms of his personal qualities. Even the most reluctant prime ministers seem compelled to include him, in recognition of his hard-won political talents and Whitehall experience.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeDepends how you identify power I suppose. Shouting from the sidelines doesn’t demonstrate power to me, rather the lack of it.
Never was this more clearly on display than during the EU referendum campaign, when breaking ranks and rejoining Cummings to become a figurehead at the Vote Leave campaign saw his close friendship with Cameron publicly break down.
.
The question is, what is better: to be good for a friend or to be good for the country?
And again identity! It seems that no UnHerd author can write an article without cramming this word in there, you know.
a series of “strategic retreats” on housing targets,
At this point he was bluntly in the wrong party to push through the needed policies against nimbyism and vested interests. You can’t alienate your own voters, even they are the blockers.
I wonder how much of this was what was really going on in the classroom. And in the age of the internet, learner independence is something of a priority.
The real issue is that those in education take insufficient notice of what psychology is telling us about how memory works. It was constructivist and anti authority approaches which were misguided not the idea that we should learn how to learn.
No criticism of Gove here – it’s obvious from his reading at the time that he knew where the problem lay.
Gove seems to have thought he didn’t the personality or charisma to be PM. I think he was right. But given the shower we have had, maybe he should have given it a shot.
Hoping for a place in the Lords maybe – might be fun watching the mischief he could get up to in that chamber.
You want to try that again, sport?
Plonk Socialist is unable to grasp that Unherd people dislike his innards, to put it more politely than he deserves.
In his defence (on this occasion at least) he was referring to the fact that I had omitted ‘Lords’ from my original comment – hence the edit.
Not if it depends on him appearing on ‘Strictly’ – which apparently is likely.
More…powerful than you can possibly imagine…?
His intellectual powers notwithstanding, Gove’s greatest strength has always been his moves on the dance floor.
This article is all of a piece with the general impression one has of Michael Gove. It’s hard to know what to make of it. He is always presented as “incredibly able”, a “very valuable asset” to any administration, and his very success, sells itself. But I’ve always suspected that his success was a sign of the very dysfunctionality at the heart of the Conservative party. Where was he on lockdown? This is the question I always ask of any politician. And… yes…for all his ability, his wonderful intellect, his excellent relationships with the civil service, the respect he commands for his wisdom…… He was, of course, a lockdown zealot.
Somebody needs to explain to me why, if we never saw him again for the rest of our lives, Britain would be any of the worse off.