After six headline-grabbing years, Edward Enninful is leaving British Vogue. His 2017 appointment as editor-in-chief catapulted him to mainstream fame, and he lost no time using this platform to broadcast how his Vogue would break new ground. But did it?
Enninful’s “manifesto”, as he called it, revolved around representation. The spotlight would shine bright on diversity and inclusion and, in doing so, would show us the radically unseen. Subsequently, he accrued several landmarks. Timothée Chalamet was the first man to have a solo cover; another front-page star was Dame Judi Dench, a supposedly pioneering move because of her age. Both, though, were and remain Hollywood A-listers.
If putting celebrities on the cover doesn’t scream revolutionary, one can cite the magazine issues which garnered Enninful the most coverage, like the edition guest-edited by Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. Yet Kate, now Princess of Wales, graced the cover of the centenary issue in 2016, while Princess Diana was a fixture in the magazine in the 1980s. Royals — even mixed-race ones — didn’t really flip the script during Enninful’s tenure.
His lauded first cover wasn’t quite what it seemed, either. Enninful featured British-Ghanaian model Adwoa Aboah — an important step, it was stressed, because his predecessor used so few black cover stars. In gushing tones, Aboah was described as a model “and feminist activist”. Less remarked on within the pages of Vogue was that she is the granddaughter of a viscount, the daughter of globally influential talent agents, and the goddaughter of Ronnie Cooke Newhouse, whose husband is the billionaire chairman of Vogue’s parent company. Another godparent is Enninful himself. So much for the fight against elitism.
The spectres of nepotism and cronyism loom still larger behind the scenes. In the course of researching a book on Vogue published in 2021, I found that between Enninful’s appointment in 2017 and 2020 there were only two covers shot by a photographer under the age of fifty. Laughably, the Guardian claimed his first cover as “further evidence that Enninful’s Vogue will be unafraid to make bold statements” because he chose the photographer Steven Meisel.
Meisel is a veteran who, in his glory days, had a $2 million per annum contract with Condé Nast. He has worked for the publication for some three decades. Other favourites of Enninful’s Vogue are Mario Testino (who’s worked with the magazine for two-and-a-half decades), and Juergen Teller (ditto). It is hard to imagine these older white men as part of Enninful’s diversity and inclusivity mission, but since photographers are less visible, why not pick the ones with whom you hang out?
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThe article Hadley Freeman was unable (or unwilling) to write. More please Unherd.
Hadley Freeman would get the facts right. This contributor a bit muddled on Vogue’s history, then and now.
EE has never commissioned Mario Testino in his entire tenure;
5 covers not 3 taken by photographers under 50 between 2017 and 2019 (figure rises in 2020);
Dorothy Todd’s sexuality, well known certainly, did not lead to her sacking. In fact, it was no impediment to her being hired for a second period as editor. She was fired for that timeworn reason: her Vogue lost the parent company the equivalent of £500,000 p.a.
Adwoa’s great-grandfather was a viscount not her grandfather (and it’s only her mother who was a ‘globally influential talent agent’ )
Jonathan Newhouse is not a billionaire. He is the scion of a large and extended family which can measure its combined wealth over three generations and across many, many ares in billions
Steven Meisel first worked for British Vogue in 1982, so that’s four decades.
‘Hard evidence’ is probably not a term she should be using.
Most enlightening. As someone who is not an expert in anything, let alone fashion, my problem with Ms Freeman’s article was her description of him being working class. A quick wikipedia search detailed his father being a major in the Ghanaian army. Take note Unherd.
To be fair, I think Enninful has done quite a lot of myth-building around his origin story.
To be fair, I think Enninful has done quite a lot of myth-building around his origin story.
Dorothy Todd’s sexuality is thought to play the main part in her sacking, according to a research paper from 2015 in the highly respected ‘Journal of Dress, Body and Culture’. It also shows the likelihood that there was no such financial loss, and these charges were trumped up as an excuse to get rid of Todd without directly mentioning her private life. Ultimately, no one can prove the loss of ‘the equivalent of £500,000’ because most records were then destroyed in WWII.
Really splitting hairs to say Jonathan Newhouse himself is not a billionaire, but his family owns many companies worth many billions. Not sure there’s any great distinction there, and certainly no proof that he isn’t himself a billionaire regardless.
EE (as the commentor affectionately abbreviates him) has worked with Mario Testino many times over decades in the industry. Likely they only haven’t worked together recently due to the allegations of sexual harassment against Testino.
Sure, the great-grandfather (not grandfather) being a viscount is an oversight… but hardly a truly significant one that impacts the point of what is being said here.
This smacks of someone from the Vogue office sent to do a wee bit of damage control while adding nothing to the main argument, which is irrefutable.
Hmmm… “Robert Muir”.. no relation to Robin Muir, contributing editor at Vogue, I suppose?!
Agree with the comment that suggests this is “damage control” from the Vogue Office. Probably use a less obvious pseudonym next time, “Robert”. Oh, and double check your facts… for a self-appointed fact-checker, it doesn’t look like you got them all right.
Most enlightening. As someone who is not an expert in anything, let alone fashion, my problem with Ms Freeman’s article was her description of him being working class. A quick wikipedia search detailed his father being a major in the Ghanaian army. Take note Unherd.
Dorothy Todd’s sexuality is thought to play the main part in her sacking, according to a research paper from 2015 in the highly respected ‘Journal of Dress, Body and Culture’. It also shows the likelihood that there was no such financial loss, and these charges were trumped up as an excuse to get rid of Todd without directly mentioning her private life. Ultimately, no one can prove the loss of ‘the equivalent of £500,000’ because most records were then destroyed in WWII.
Really splitting hairs to say Jonathan Newhouse himself is not a billionaire, but his family owns many companies worth many billions. Not sure there’s any great distinction there, and certainly no proof that he isn’t himself a billionaire regardless.
EE (as the commentor affectionately abbreviates him) has worked with Mario Testino many times over decades in the industry. Likely they only haven’t worked together recently due to the allegations of sexual harassment against Testino.
Sure, the great-grandfather (not grandfather) being a viscount is an oversight… but hardly a truly significant one that impacts the point of what is being said here.
This smacks of someone from the Vogue office sent to do a wee bit of damage control while adding nothing to the main argument, which is irrefutable.
Hmmm… “Robert Muir”.. no relation to Robin Muir, contributing editor at Vogue, I suppose?!
Agree with the comment that suggests this is “damage control” from the Vogue Office. Probably use a less obvious pseudonym next time, “Robert”. Oh, and double check your facts… for a self-appointed fact-checker, it doesn’t look like you got them all right.
Hadley Freeman would get the facts right. This contributor a bit muddled on Vogue’s history, then and now.
EE has never commissioned Mario Testino in his entire tenure;
5 covers not 3 taken by photographers under 50 between 2017 and 2019 (figure rises in 2020);
Dorothy Todd’s sexuality, well known certainly, did not lead to her sacking. In fact, it was no impediment to her being hired for a second period as editor. She was fired for that timeworn reason: her Vogue lost the parent company the equivalent of £500,000 p.a.
Adwoa’s great-grandfather was a viscount not her grandfather (and it’s only her mother who was a ‘globally influential talent agent’ )
Jonathan Newhouse is not a billionaire. He is the scion of a large and extended family which can measure its combined wealth over three generations and across many, many ares in billions
Steven Meisel first worked for British Vogue in 1982, so that’s four decades.
‘Hard evidence’ is probably not a term she should be using.
The article Hadley Freeman was unable (or unwilling) to write. More please Unherd.
“His 2017 appointment as editor-in-chief catapulted him to mainstream fame”
A bit niche I would have thought.
AB FAB wasn’t a comedy – It was a documentary. A Bottle of Bolly, a Bus Pass and off to Harvey Nicks for some therapy! I know how to live!
“His 2017 appointment as editor-in-chief catapulted him to mainstream fame”
A bit niche I would have thought.
AB FAB wasn’t a comedy – It was a documentary. A Bottle of Bolly, a Bus Pass and off to Harvey Nicks for some therapy! I know how to live!