The evangelical churches “promise people what they want, now: health and wealth. And this is why it’s the faith of the world’s working poor,” explains Elle Hardy, author of an exposé on the religion’s global spread. We are a long way from sociologist Max Weber’s understanding of the way Protestantism sustained capitalism: hard work, duty, sacrifice and delayed gratification, in the name of rewards in the afterlife. Today, it’s the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Grifting. As Hardy tells me, “these people aren’t reading Luther, they’re reading Elon Musk biographies”.
In a context of wide and deep mistrust in institutions, Neo-Pentecostal churches also reject traditional authorities, be they priests or politicians. Its adherents, feeling besieged by the world around them, are told by pastors that only you, the believer, can dig yourself out of this hole. But the church also provides a community amid this individualism. In a precarious economy, the little microenterprise you set up to make ends meet will find willing customers among the faithful — once given endorsement by your pastor. The appeal here to the poor and struggling is obvious.
These social transformations have clear political consequences. There is a large, multi-party evangelical bench in Congress: 195 federal deputies (38% of the lower house) and 8 senators. Neo-Pentecostals are a fair proportion of them. According to news outlet Metrópoles, 52 deputies elected in 2018 are Neo-Pentecostals.
These churches have their base in the poorest section of the population, but over the past two decades, the ranks of the faithful have steadily ascended into what is referred to in Brazil as the “new middle class”. The “Lulista” years, from 2003 to 2016, saw strong growth, cash transfers to the poor, an expansion of credit, and new private universities sustained by access to student loans. But this was not equalled by improved public services, while at the same time the rate of unionisation fell precipitously. Stagnating formal job creation has resulted in an informality rate exceeding 40%. For poor and lower-middle-class Brazilians, opportunity coexists with extreme precarity.
The result has been a much more individualistic country in which Marçal’s style of self-help has flourished. “Imagine yourself a baby who is taken from a royal family in the castle and given to a poor family. But as you grow, you look up to the castle and think, ‘I belong there,’” Marçal preaches.
One former Marçal follower has sued the life coach for encouraging her to make this vision a reality — by quitting her steady job and starting her own business. In court, the plaintiff alleged that Marçal told her, “we should not be celetista” (a reference to the CLT, Brazil’s labour code that guaranteed employment rights, and thus shorthand for formal employment), given that we are “born to prosper”. “He believes that everyone should choose to become an entrepreneur, that we should listen to our ‘heart’… and not be enslaved,” she explained, arguing that Marçal preys on the vulnerable.
Marçal leverages this attitude into politics. “I feel like going to every person and yelling, ‘you’re asleep, you’re zombies, don’t you want Brazil to improve? Don’t you want change!?’ What do I want? I want you to prosper,” he exclaims in one recent livestream.
On his official campaign website, there are five keystones. The first is “every Brazilian a governor”. But this is no democratic slogan, it is an individualist one, dovetailing with his broader gospel discourse about prosperity. This becomes evident in another keystone, “every family a nation” — a slogan that could resonate just as well with Bolsonaro’s conservative, evangelical voters. The family is under threat and needs defence against the hostile outside world. Society is nowhere to be found. There is only “my fatherland, my family”, as yet another keystone has it.
The political echoes of Bolsonarismo should be obvious here. Indeed, the sharp-tongued Marçal calls the president merely an “expired antibiotic”: he did his job but now the moment has passed. “I’ll say it until my last days, until Bolsonaro hands me the [presidential] sash. I’ll get down on my knees and wash his feet and thank him for getting rid of the PT [the Workers’ Party],” Marçal explained.
At the same time, Marçal has sought to distance himself from the chaotic Bolsonaro. “I’m the resistance!”, he says. “None of the other ‘third way’ held on, I’m the third way we all dream of!”
Indeed, a huge range of other, more established politicians have auditioned for the “third way” — between Lula and Bolsonaro — and failed. Previously, at the 2018 election, these politicians, mostly from the establishment Right, backed Bolsonaro in the second round. This year, they believed they had a chance to be president. After all, Bolsonaro can no longer claim to be an outsider, and his “disgovernment” has repelled many.
But the return of Lula — the most popular president in Brazilian history — has swallowed up the anti-Bolsonaro vote. And Brazilians have no love for the uncharismatic politicians of the mainstream Right. These are “cuckservatives”, in American internet parlance, who have seen the bulk of their voters abandon them in favour of the far-Right. Most of them have grudgingly fallen behind Lula in the search of some temporary stability.
Yet if Lula defeats Bolsonaro as expected, the anti-system new Right, with its base in Right-wing YouTube channels, will need a champion. This is undoubtedly terrain Marçal or someone like him can exploit. For instance, Marçal has already warned that Lula’s promise to reverse a grievous rollback of workers’ rights “will enable huge corruption”. The message here? Embrace precarity, throw yourself into the market, trust only yourself, your family, and God.
And so, across the country, the growing uncertainty of Brazilian life means the country will continue to be fertile ground for the pastor-coach type. Violent crime forces a recoil into a defensive posture inside the family unit. Economic informality means the lure of entrepreneurship pulls harder than that of a steady job, itself a growing rarity. The discrediting of mainstream institutions creates a demand for new sources of authority. The waning of tradition and Catholicism — with its more collective bent — should be providing an opening for progressive, secular politics. But for many, absent some big new idea to fill the void of meaning, it also represents a seemingly existential threat. If the public realm promises little, why not see if a little “mental unblocking” can make you rich?
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis type of evangelical hucksterism seems to parallel the rise of the progressive Left in the West. Both are extreme ideologies, loosely rooted in reality, that appeared in reaction to an uncertain world where the old institutions have decayed.
I used to laugh at this sort of evangelical nonsense and feel sorry for people in developing nations who were desperate enough to believe in these types of ideas. Now something analogous has arrived in the developed world which I think tells us about the trajectory of first-world nations.
“There’ll be a bunch of people in your life, like mountain rescuers, telling you what you can and can’t do in your life. But only you can decide.”
An absolutely stellar quotation. I’ll be giggling all day at that. Words to live by!
(Full disclosure – I’m a midwestern American living in Southern Brazil for about 5 years as an estrangeiro permanente- permanent resident).
The article focuses on this self-help guru who seems to be promoting “Power of Positive Thinking” combined with individual pursuit of wealth combined with a variation of evangelical Christianity and New Age Spiritualism.
I’ve never heard of him, but note that my (Brazilian) wife’s podologist claims to be Christian but more “spiritual” (centered on the self) and admits to the New Age parts. Also, she also seems invariably to be happy and positive, and I think she fits the profile.
That said, I agree that the centrality of the Catholic Church is losing ground here (many who claim to be atheists) and that this may affect the sense of well-being among the 240MM citizens.
Regarding the politics, there are many who fervently see Bolsonaro (the ex army captain and member of congress for many years) as the only hope to forestall Lula the quasi Marxist – Lula is a leader of the International left, having, co-founded with Fidel Castro, the São Paolo Forum (a regional forum for left wing parties), in the early 90’s, after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
So the tension seems to be between those who prefer good order and capitalism (including many who prefer the Military Dictatorship (1962-88) to the societal chaos (breakdown of morality, family etc), and those who prefer people like Lula to rob from the rich and give to the poor.
Boil away the fat, Brazilians have no culture or history of self-government: Brazil first became a republic in 1889 or so after being a colony of Portugal (until early 1800’s) under the Português King (he came to Rio de Janeiro to avoid Napoleon) then empire under that King’s son Dom Pedro II – then various years of quasi republic, military rule etc until the late 1980’s.
So, there is always corruption (for which Lula was sent to jail – and was sprung by the Supreme Court on a technicality, and now the statue of limitations has expired) – all the way down to the average person.
Clearly cultures are hard to change (to make the average person capable of self-government) and I think that’s why there’s so much fluidity in the social norms, as the authority of the Church continues to recede.
It’s always enlightening to hear from boots on the ground as it were 🙂 TY! The local perspective is never too much, it’s forever not enough.
My wife is Brazilian, we live in the state of Rio de Janeiro and she is Catholic. She says Pablo Marcal is very misrepresented.
He wishes to create a Brazil in which all have opportinity to prosper, there is full political and economic transparency and has made his proposals on how to do this in a realistic business way very clear.
He gas publically told Lula he is a criminal and that he wants Lula to sue him so all can be revealed in open court
Further the representations of Pablo in the media are designed to mislead and present him as some sort of maveric with strange idwas. He is simply focused on making peoples’ lives better, in a meaningful and economically sound way for all and that having a balance in life, family, financial, health and spiritual welling being is the best way to achieve this.
A Catholic Priest took Pablo’s place in the Presidential elections after the Supreme court blocked Pablo from standing, for very dubious reasons. The Priest was very soft spoken but made many simple and good points during the TV debate between Presidential candidates. He said that all Brazil knows Lula is a criminal and what crimes Lula has comitted. The TV coverage turned away from Lula’s response which I am told was very strange.
So Pablo Marcal wants good things that can be delivered to all Brazilians in a lasting and meaningful way, including having non religious spiritual, civil and family values, has no political affiliations and while he feels neither Presidential candidate is great a Lula victory would be a terrible blow for the Brazilian people.
Separately there have been reports that the first round voting was rigged in some way. Lula won in states where the Senators elected were from right wing parties. It is simply not possible that those who voted for a right wing Senator would vote for Lula.
There are reports that the military raided a site at which the electronic votes were being rigged and that in some places more votes were registered than there were voters.
That in many places Lula “won” there was no cheering or street parties.
There are also reports of big cheering in Brazilian prisons when Lula was announced as winning the first round vote
None of this is being reported even as a false story in the main media ie Globo
A very useful and informative article. I have struggled to understand the appeal of Evangelical Christianity to the previously Catholic poor and middle class in Brazil, when the new faith offers no concrete social change – I spent time in San Paulo and was shocked at the unaddressed social problems there. I can see how the collapse of institutions (as a result of greed or corruption or indifference to fellow citizens) and the precarity of work has opened up a space for a particular kind of belief. And the grifters and hucksters will gather around these churches.
Bom dia
Bom dia