April 22, 2022 - 7:00am
Le Canard Enchaîné, France’s famous satirical and current affairs news magazine, reports that Boris Johnson’s trip to Kiev ruffled a few feathers in the Elysée palace in Paris. According to the Canard, Emmanuel Macron saw Johnson’s capacity to capture the limelight as “irritating,” despite Johnson “having not done much in Ukraine.” For Macron, “Johnson is doing Johnson populism!”
The French president had personal reasons to be frustrated at Johnson’s surprise trip — which saw the British prime minister warmly welcomed by Ukrainian officials and civilians — as he was himself on the verge of a similar diplomatic visit to Kiev. With Johnson taking the wind out of his sails, Macron, currently President of the Council of the European Union, called off the trip which would likely have paid off domestically in his runoff against Marine Le Pen.
But more generally, Macron’s irritation reflects his inability to gain much political capital over the war in Ukraine. His long-established stance on the need for Europe to become a strategically autonomous actor on its own right could have been an effective pitch, but instead it seems the once-derided “Global Britain” has taken poll position, with its well-publicised delivery of weapons and its firm political support for Ukraine.
While Zelenskyy praised Johnson for his activism and support, even arguing he would “go down in history forever,” relations with Macron have been cooler. When asked whether Russia had organised a “genocide” in Ukraine, Johnson commented that the killings in Bucha “don’t look far short of a genocide”. The French president, meanwhile, shied away from using the term, arguing that “the word has a meaning that needs to be characterised legally, not by politicians.”
The Ukrainian President described Macron’s comments as “very painful,” and had previously argued that France, unlike Britain, was not providing Ukraine with sufficient support out of “fear of Russia.” When asked if Johnson had done more than Macron, the Zelenskyy made clear that Johnson was the “leader who is helping more.” But in a rare win for Macron, Zelenskyy also weighed in on the ongoing presidential election, saying that he had built a “tie with Macron that he wouldn’t want to lose”. Still, this was hardly the most emphatic endorsement.
Macron’s image in Ukraine seems similarly tainted. In the weeks that preceded the invasion, he went on ultimately futile long calls and meetings with Vladimir Putin to avoid a military escalation. His unsuccessful diplomatic efforts got him an entry in Ukrainian slang with the verb “Macroner,” which translates into “appearing to be worried by a situation but to do nothing.” Macron’s now infamous late-night meeting pictures in a sweatshirt in an apparent attempt to imitate Zelenskyy’s style were similarly derided.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThis line says a lot about how the two countries have approached this. Whilst I do not doubt that Johnson’s visit was in part a PR show, the UK has had a far more consistent policy of support to Ukraine that goes back to 2014 and before – i.e. pre-Johnson and Macron.
That Macron sees it as Johnson vs himself says a lot. Macron has been trying damn hard to be Europe’s premier statesman – not surprising with elections looming. But it’s not just about the two leaders, and Macron doesn’t seem to realise that the UK didn’t start getting involved in February.
The UK has seen its longer term investment in equipment and direct training support to Ukraine pay dividends. Boris’ foray into statesmanship has therefore completely one-upped Macron’s more flowery high profile musings on the matter. Johnson had the benefit of his words and actions being backed up by real long term policy decisions. France by contrast has done relatively little real work
France should be ashamed, not jealous…if I may project the feelings of Macron onto the entire nation…for two reasons:
1. To lead Europe, France must do things that other nations will follow. In the case of Ukraine, a robust response by France – a nuclear power – might have deterred Putin. When phone calls didn’t work, there was no Clauswitzian Plan B.
2. France owes Liberty a huge debt, which it has yet to repay. This was the moment to repay it. The British (Empire) saved France in WW I by fighting on Belgian and French soil. In WW II the English speaking people liberated France. Why are the French not holding the line somewhere in Ukraine? Was Hitler satisfied reoccupying The Rhineland?
Boris shambles, Macron flounces?
On the subject of which, I just came back from visiting York, where the actual Shambles provide a lovely example of a near-perfect medieval streetscape. Well worth a visit on a sunny spring day.
My lovely hometown is well worth a visit on any day of the week and in any weather.
Is this supposed to mean something?
But France armaments industry is supplying into Ukraine – on Russian tanks; see
French shipments of military equipment to Russia despite EU embargo and the violation of rule of law principles (europa.eu)
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-9-2022-001087_EN.html
A very telling picture.