“I’m at my family place at the moment.” I hit on this combination of words a couple of years ago. It sounded — I hoped it sounded — sophisticated and cosmopolitan, as if I was referring to surfing an extensive collection of properties rather than what I actually meant: living with my parents. A couple of weeks shy of my 29th birthday, I finally moved out and broke a spell of several years there.
But many guys my age haven’t managed it. According to new data from the Office of National Statistics, 35% of men in the UK aged 20 to 35 were living with their parents last year, an increase from 26% in 2000. One might think this is all part and parcel of our roiling housing-market apocalypse, but the figure for young women of the same age is just 22%.
This is not just a trifling difference: young men are nearly 60% more likely to live with their parents than young women. As if being afflicted by poor mental health and the siren calls of manosphere influencers weren’t enough, guys also have to contend with dodging their mom on the stairs after they come home from a session.
Some of this is based on appreciable material trends. British women are starting to put the gender pay gap into reverse. In 2022, three women enrolled in university for every two men. Among Brits aged between 21 and 26, women now have a slightly higher median income than men.
To this, we can add that men are simply less social than women — some research even suggests that roughly a quarter of men have no close friends at all. Men will happily sit in their bedroom and molder into misanthropy rather than head off into the bright, wide world like their sisters. Even those who aren’t shut-ins might, if they’re living in an expensive city, simply not have enough friends to facilitate flat-sharing. Then there’s the daunting reality of actually living with strangers from flat shares in big cities. Anyone who’s run the gauntlet of sites like SpareRoom will know there are far worse fates than bumping into a neighbor who knew you at 13 while leaving the house on your way to work.
All these stay-at-home sons illuminate an underappreciated fact: modern male online culture is strikingly passive. Looksmaxxing, for instance, valorizes external, set beauty standards to a degree that would make the worst caricature of female vanity blush. By its “total, physical capitulation to the internet”, John Paul Brammer recently wrote in Playboy, it’s a “radically submissive movement”.
Or how about “monitoring the situation”, whether that means the Iran war or the global financial markets. It’s not about getting out into the world; it’s about sitting in a room and reading tweets. And why not make that room your childhood bedroom? A 2024 Ofcom report into Generation-Z social media habits found that all of the platforms associated with real-life networks of friends — Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook — were dominated by women. Sites where you are more likely to interact with people you don’t know and consume strangers’ content, such as X, Reddit and YouTube, were male-dominated.
To be sure, men get into fits of anxiety about being passive — hence the rise of an influencer culture which plays on that anxiety. But when confronted with a choice — leave the nest, or not — their inaction tells its own story.







Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
Subscribe