The ruins of failed 20th consumption. Bill Pugliano/Liaison/Getty.

Almost exactly 60 years ago, the Duke of Gloucester launched a new world. There, amid the artificial lighting, and the multi-storey carpark, he unveiled Broad Marsh — a £10 million shopping and entertainment complex right in the middle of Nottingham. The local council promised the centre would “completely transform” this corner of town, just south of the city heart, and it’s hard to disagree. Gone went a warren of ancient lanes, with its medieval ruins and Victorian garrets. In their place came a bland brick structure, with coloured tiling, and fountains, and wooden play animals for children to play on.
Now, though, Broad Marsh is dead, with Nottingham City Council this month expected to finalise plans to complete the centre’s demolition — paving the way for a vast redevelopment scheme for 1,000 homes and 20,000 square feet of new retail, office space and entertainment. It will, as you may have guessed, completely transform the area.
To those familiar with Nottingham, this will surely be welcome news: the shopping centre closed in 2020 during extensive renovation works. For the past five years, locals have had to meander through a half-demolished site, through makeshift walkways and past mounds of rubble, to get from the train station to the city centre. Behind a bright green hoarding sits what’s left of Broad Marsh, an unsubtle metaphor for the 20th century consumer dream laid waste. Yet more than the mistakes of the past, Nottingham’s story has future lessons too — not least on the dangers of private investors, and how towns don’t even need mass retail to thrive in the 21st century.
In many ways, the Broad Marsh story is unremarkable, both in its rise and fall. Around 300 shopping centres opened in Britain between the mid-Sixties and the mid-Seventies, while over 250 have closed, been demolished or are scheduled for redevelopment. There’s no shortage of ailing precincts, and 2025 is set to be a busy year for the wrecking ball. The Core in Leeds; the St Nicholas Centre in Sutton; Slough’s Queensmere — these are just three demolition schemes among many.
The future of Broad Marsh has been hanging in the balance since the mall’s operator, intu (the lower-case “i” is trendily deliberate), went into administration during the first Covid lockdown. But the saga stretches back decades, with unrealised renovation plans dating back to the millennium. To many, indeed, it has become little more than a mark of urban blight. In 2020, a city-wide consultation found that more than two thirds of residents and businesses would prefer green open space, and premises for hospitality and the community — while retail polled poorly by comparison.
Things weren’t always so depressing. As that royal opening so tantalisingly hints, shopping precincts were once all the rage, as local authorities hoped to revitalise declining town centres, many of which had been crumbling since the war or even earlier. Several factors contributed to this boom — not least planning recommendations to alleviate and anticipate growing car traffic in urban cores.
Private property companies were crucial to the financing and delivery of new shopping centres. With a government ban on out-of-town developments, owing to concerns for the viability of the British high street, as well as limits on commercial office development in London, provincial towns across Britain suddenly became appealing investments.
In Nottingham, the Broad Marsh area had long been earmarked for redevelopment, with plans to build a bus station on land majority-owned by the council. The impetus to do so came from an offer of a partnership with Town and City Properties, a company better known by the name of its shopping centres: Arndale. It was, on paper, an excellent offer. The council would get its bus station, and the city would secure a modern shopping complex inspired by the latest international malls.
The developer, in turn, would secure a lucrative cash cow, as Arndale Centres were simultaneously constructed from Bradford to Bolton to Nelson. Like at Nottingham, all these examples are currently awaiting demolition. And, as at Broad Marsh, they tended to offer drab architectural fare, their enclosed pedestrian malls a spaceship-like presence in the wider city.
Partly for this reason — and notwithstanding the enthusiasts in local government — there was vocal public opposition to such developments right from the start. That’s especially when the plans typically came with threats to demolish historic sites. Beyond the remains of a medieval abbey, the Broad Marsh redevelopment also included the demolition of Drury Hill, a public highway dating back to the 14th century. Other objections focused on access to space: some in Nottingham felt the shopping centre’s location could be shifted to leave space for a park.
In Nottingham, as elsewhere, several public inquiries were held into the redevelopment of Broad Marsh. Yet the strength of local feeling was ultimately ignored. What good, wondered the powers-that-be, was a rundown, centuries-old passageway, when it could be replaced with something modern and weatherproof?
By the mid-Seventies, then, British cities had been transformed. Yet though they offered a cash bonanza for councils and developers alike, this private-public arrangement soon proved something of a Faustian pact. Access to previously public highways was now policed by private firms, gleefully funnelling pedestrians through covered malls. High rents in shopping centres also excluded small businesses from competing with chain stores for space. All this amounted to the colonisation of central Nottingham, and the alienation of local people and local enterprise, especially as property takeovers in the late-20th century meant mall operators consisted of an increasingly small cohort of global real estate firms.
No wonder Nottingham boasted the lowest retail occupancy rates in the country by 2011, an oversaturation made worse by the development of a second shopping area, the Victoria Centre, just a 10-minute stroll to the north. As those stark closure numbers imply, meanwhile, these problems are far from unique to the East Midlands. Britain’s retail sector never fully recovered from the 2008 recession, while shopping habits have substantially shifted in recent years, a move only exacerbated by the pandemic. For their part, many shopping centre operators have adapted by converting shops into leisure space in anticipation of a more experiential economy. Think cinemas, restaurants and bowling alleys: this had been the general thrust of intu’s botched remodelling. Crazy golf is another popular choice.
Following intu’s collapse, in 2020, Nottingham City Council took the Broad Marsh site back into full public ownership. Later that year, it launched a city-wide public consultation into the future of the area, with the findings reimagined in a scheme by Thomas Heatherwick, the designer provocateur responsible for the redevelopment of Coal Drops Yard in Kings Cross (and the failed Garden Bridge project). Alongside housing and commercial space, the key idea was to reestablish the area’s lost medieval throughways. Heatherwick mooted a green space too, while also suggesting that the centre’s dismantled concrete and steel frame could be used for public events.
In short, then, Heatherwick’s scheme suggested that a better future could emerge from the ruins of failed 20th consumption. And, certainly, there is a clear precedent for this approach. In 2019, for instance, Stockton-on-Tees council purchased a redundant Seventies shopping centre — which it has demolished for the creation of a new public park, part-financed by the Government’s now-ended Future High Streets Fund.
In Nottingham, though, the Broad Marsh redevelopment has made slow progress. On three occasions, the council failed to secure Levelling Up funds (remember that?) to finance further demolition. Last May, the architecture firm BDP unveiled its masterplan for the area, in response to Heatherwick’s vision, and in September the “Green Heart” park finally opened. Even so, much of the area remains a building site. Just as bad, and echoing the errors of earlier decades, the Broad Marsh plans are now being adapted in the hopes of securing private investment, with a question mark hanging over keeping that ambitious steel frame — sparked by hesitancy from investors and developers over its viability.
Whatever comes next must be scrutinised — particularly given the poor decisions of the past. At the height of that mid-century boom, it was not uncommon for municipal amenities to be dropped from final planning schemes, as indeed happened with an undelivered batch of houses at Broad Marsh. With the financial burden of intu’s disastrous departure weighing heavy on the council’s books, any redevelopment in Nottingham clearly needs to pay. But if the past 60 years have shown anything, it’s that the shopping centre is no longer (if it ever was) at the forefront of rejuvenating Britain’s urban cores. For this reason, we should be sceptical of anyone claiming that redevelopment needs yet more retail space.
Housing, indeed, is emerging as one of the clearest alternative uses for shopping centres, especially as one way of meeting Labour’s agenda for 1.5 million new homes. But that, too, must come with caveats. In 2020, housing activist Bob Colenutt wrote of a “finance-housebuilding complex” and described it as a root cause of Britain’s ongoing housing crisis. Among other things, he noted that developers are not obliged to follow through on ancillary amenities — health centres, bus stops — once construction is under way. At the same time, recent research suggests that 75% of new housing developments are mediocre or poor, while the majority of Build to Rent developments are operated by foreign private investment funds. It all sounds remarkably like the partnerships that local authorities found themselves entangled in six decades ago.
Though, in short, it makes sense for housing to be high up the agenda for the Broad Marsh redevelopment, there is also an opportunity for the council to be bold. With the area back in public ownership — as is the case with many derelict shopping centres across Britain — the council should insist on a robust, beautiful vision for Nottingham’s new urban quarter. In practice, that means reinvesting in public spaces and local enterprise, from well-designed pedestrian walkways to rent-capped commercial units for local business. For my part, I’d like to see planners retain a small section of Broad Marsh’s broken frame, as a reminder of global capital’s fickle promise of urban utopia.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeOnce the ancient passageways have been demolished, they’re gone.
Any architect, however well meaning, who even thinks they can somehow be recreated should be disbarred from the profession; you can’t “recreate” a thousand or more years of organic history by design.
The despoilation of our organically evolved town and city centres during the latter part of the 20th century was an act of urban vandalism far more virulent than the most disaffected youth trashing bus shelters and flower beds could ever aspire to. The latter is quite possibly a product of the former. Shame on you – the lot of you. You’ve deprived your country of much of what made it great.
I’ve witnessed this during the course of my own lifetime. No less than three soulless and architecturally abominable shopping centres opened to great fanfare; each failing and being replaced by the other, all now lying empty and awaiting demolition. What an utter waste; the Wasteland that TS Eliot evinced brought into being and immediately dying, each edifice the externally constructed equivalent of the desolation within.
+100. Sir John Betjeman led the – then unfashionable – rearguard defence. It did not save the Euston Arch. There were even plans to bulldoze.Covent Garden. Thankfully that was the highwater mark of Le Corbusier-inspired urban destruction.
Sir John did however ‘save’ St Pancras station and its wonderful hotel.
I gather there are plans to rebuild the Euston Arch, much of which currently lies on the bottom of the River Lee. Do you happen to know anything about this?
The Dissolution of the Monasteries saw the destruction of about 37/38 of our 60 or so “great “churches”, including at least one Cathedral.*
WWII allowed a plethora of ‘town planners’ to “slash and burn” their way through many of our historic cities and county towns. The late Alec Clifton-Taylor and Sir John Betjeman and many others did their best to stop this vandalism but with only limited success.
However let’s be realistic, most people couldn’t differentiate between the Parthenon and the Pantheon and who can really blame them, given the state education on offer?
*Coventry, although one could also make a case for Bath
I don’t understand how this could happen. These things were planned. By experts!
Nottingham is bankrupt, period.
Ditto Birmingham.
Think we can ditto most English cities and towns.
Like the rest of the UK!
Time to raze them to the ground, the human soul can only stand a certain level of ugly. They won’t be missed by any honest man or woman.
Shopping malls are controlled centrally by a real estate fund, entity, etc. Shoppers who shop there are also easily controlled centrally, influenced subtly through various mechanisms. Deprived is the consumer who only has mega shopping malls as the choice to do their grocery shopping, consumerism, etc. X
In the US the shopping malls damaged many downtown shopping districts. In turn the malls and centers were done in by Amazon and it’s minions of UPS and FedEx. Work from home twisted the knife even further. The big mall in my area was opened in 1976, Christmas traffic there was enormous in the eighties. It is limping along now with a few shops, a gym, training center and now a gov’t agency building has been tacked on. The four large chain anchor retailers don’t even exist anymore.
Over here in the colonies, we’ve had better luck locating our shopping malls away from city centers. Those in downtown areas – Circle Center and Union Station in Indianapolis, for example – have performed poorly in the long run as crime and youthful disorder kept suburbanites away. It’s true that shopping centers (malls, we call them) have been suffering recently, but that’s much more a matter of change wrought by the new Internet economy, something I suspect may have affected yours as well.
I go through Westfield Stratford every West Ham home game and without fail, it’s heaving. All new buildings done well are generally great. How they age is another thing altogether.
Unlike 60s shopping centres, that has high density housing adjacent. As well as numerous sports facilities. Quite a sight to see thousands of Hammers fans traipsing past designer goods stores on the way to the stadium!
Who knows, of course that might be its downfall. Personally I find Westfield just as soul destroying as any other large retail centre.
Not sure why the uk would go with malls. It’s understandable in locations where you can die if you’re caught outside for half an hour, but why would you build them any where else?
“a vast redevelopment scheme for 1,000 homes and 20,000 square feet of new retail, office space and entertainment”
20,000 square feet? Is that a typo? That’s pretty small.
Death of the mall, UK version. Consumer market just moved on. No need to spill more words analyzing.