It doesn’t make much difference if it was hostage diplomacy or old-school press trampling — or, as now seems clear, the tit-for-tat response to the detention of an Iranian in Italy. He, it turns out, was accused of supplying drone technology that killed US troops. But whatever the cause, the outcome was the same: Cecilia Sala, a 29-year-old reporter with Il Foglio, was detained in Tehran’s Evin Prison for over a fortnight, before finally being freed this week. Her stay can’t have been pleasant. From beatings to rape, the high-security jail has become a byword for the most brutal transgressions governments can conjure, and is infamous for hosting a bewildering range of Iranian artists, writers and academics.
When Sala was first arrested, the Iranian authorities could only offer a bland statement that she had “violated the laws of the Islamic Republic.” In the past, they would have trotted out the usual accusations, of espionage and conspiracies to overthrow the system. This time around, though, the judiciary assured the world that it was meticulously examining the Italian’s case — and her release came soon after.
“She gave voice to Iranian women fighting against the obligation to wear the veil, of course, but also to members of the establishment,” says Luciana Borsatti, the former ANSA bureau chief in Tehran, noting that Sala also interviewed figures like Hossein Kanani Moghaddam, one of the founders of the Revolutionary Guards. But Sala’s coverage of Iran was notably subtle: it gave voice to those Iranians who oppose the current system but also reject the kinds of strict sanctions encouraged in the diaspora. She was eager to report fairly on Iran, and had been accused by hardcore exiles of not being sufficiently critical of the regime. Yet even she found herself detained, held in solitary confinement over Christmas.
In theory, the Islamic Republic’s constitution protects free expression. Borrowed from the French Fifth Republic, it states that nobody should be interrogated for holding an opinion, that nobody can be deprived of the right to peaceful assembly, and that journalists are free to publish materials unless they threaten the tenets of Islam or violate public rights. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in 2018 that whoever claims they’re discriminated for their views is just “lying” — a shameless lie in itself, but revealing about the way the prickly way the regime deals with criticism.
Nor does the Islamic Republic seem much more self-confident when it comes to foreign journalists. Granted visas lasting a mere eight days, even as they’re subject to strict surveillance, the best most correspondents can do is report on what they see. There’s certainly plenty to cover. Inflation is skyrocketing and people cannot afford groceries. Iran is sitting on the second largest natural gas reserves in the world, but can’t heat up people’s homes. In a country where the number of female university students has long surpassed that of their male counterparts, women are still being dragged through the streets, and verbally abused for strands of hair sticking out their headscarves.
For describing all this, Sala found herself in jail, even as unabashed anti-regime activists can apparently outwit the intelligence services with ease. One excellent example here is Catherine Perez-Shakdam, a French Jew who posed as a friend of the Islamic Republic before securing an audience with the ayatollah himself. It all speaks to the essentially arbitrary nature of reporting in Iran — foreign correspondents have little idea whether they’ll make it home safe, let alone secure a decent scoop for their troubles. That’s even as reporters risk becoming pawns in broader geopolitical games. As Sala discovered, she was detained in Iran for hijinks in Milan: not because of anything she actually did, but because of the flag on her passport.
So why do reporters come? Part of the answer surely involves basic journalistic principles of honesty and truth. For Sala herself, an attachment to Iran clearly matters too — even if not everyone is quite so thoughtful. The truth is that much foreign journalism on Iran condemns the country to stereotype. Much outside reporting is so cliched, in fact, that millions of Westerners were lately astounded to discover that, far from being an Arabian Nights fantasy, it actually snows in Iran. If you ask Iranians, they’ll acknowledge having long felt dehumanised that a country they cherish, for its heritage, arts, culture and food, is merely framed as a vast missile factory, where people wake up fantasising about yellow cake and go to bed dreaming of enriched uranium.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI travelled across Iran in the 1990s. It was good, bad, and ugly in all sorts of different ways, but one thing it wasn’t was like its portrayal in the pre-internet British media. I liked the Iranian people, they were good-humoured and sarcastic. If not for the regime I would love to revisit.
Anyway, compared with Pakistan, Iran felt like Switzerland.
Iran is an insane place. I would fully support any foreign journalist avoiding it for their own safety. It has similarities to Russia and the Highlands of New Guinea where an innocent word or look can lead to captivity in places similar to hell on earth, or death. Avoid the place until the savages and headmen are taken out.
Thanks for an excellent article.
I cannot comment on Iran, but IMO, foreign journalists of the Western MSM fall into the trap of reporting what they want to dogmatically ascertain as per the Woke Progressive views their media groups hold.
They prefer not to abide by either local sentiments of ordinary people, or align themselves with billionaire meddlers like George Soros or Bill Gates with similar globalist Leftist agendas.
That is sad. For India at least I can say, that even during colonial rule, Valentin Chirol of the Times, London; and later, Shiv Naipaul, Malcom Muggeridge or even diplomatic memoirs from John Galbraith were far more authentic and exhibited an understanding of the actual contexts.
“Even during colonial rule”
(eyeroll)
Why ever should it be eye roll inducing a sentence?! Lots of interesting things happened at the time!
Good news. Thought she was going to be used as a hostage and an exchange prisoner.