X Close

A food apocalypse is coming There is no plan to feed Britain in a crisis

British farmers are already struggling. Ian Forsyth/Getty Images

British farmers are already struggling. Ian Forsyth/Getty Images


December 21, 2024   8 mins

In the dystopian drama The Last of Us, a fungal virus has spread through foodstuffs turning infected humans into zombies. The survivors live in ghettos, among the ruins, armed to avoid a gruesome living death. They grow their own food to avoid the infected produce. Preppers and survivalist whackos find that their hour has come. Clean food has become a precious thing.

That’s where my interest in the show kicked in, because the future of our food system is something that I’m a little obsessed with. I am haunted by the memory of those empty supermarket shelves during the Covid pandemic, which didn’t quite lead to a food panic, but sent chills through anyone thinking about food security. We learned then that our just-in-time food system wasn’t very resilient and seemed vulnerable to collapse if given a major shock. (Spoiler Alert: Covid is nowhere near the grim end of the scale for disaster planning.)

I began asking questions about food security during Covid, and like a loose thread in a jumper, the more I pulled the more my already weak faith in the current food system began to fray. What I learnt is frankly a little scary. It turns out it isn’t zombies that we should be afraid of, but how poorly prepared we are for the future.

A lot of people assume that somewhere in Britain there are sheds full of food that we’d distribute in a disaster. Surely there is a grain or butter mountain somewhere? Surely the UK government has a plan for such a crisis?

Nope. No sheds. No stores. No mountains of food. No plan.

All politicians say that food security matters, but no one admits that basically we don’t have it. Britain probably has less than a week of food supplies. The only food in the UK is what’s on the shelves of our supermarkets now, and what’s in their lorries on the way to the shops. Oh, and whatever you have in the fridge, plus a few crops growing on UK farms or stored in barns, and whatever is edible and roaming around in fields. And perhaps you could hunt or forage if you have a gun or a trap or two.

If a major crisis hits, then, you better get to Asda quick before everyone else — or else pray that the trucks deliver more food to the store. And if that logistical system breaks down, let’s say during a major oil or fuel crisis, you are suddenly going to be paying a lot more attention to local food producers within walking distance of your house, and you are going to wish you had a garden or an allotment, or that your community had them.

“Britain probably has less than a week of food supplies.”

In such a crisis, you are going to curse your little fridge-freezer because it doesn’t hold enough food, and you will suddenly wish you had a pantry like your grandma had, full of preserved foodstuffs, and a deep freezer. We used to have much more food storage in our homes and communities, but we outsourced that to the supermarket shelf from around the Eighties.

You might expect the government to bring you food in an emergency, but frankly, they haven’t got any — and Covid proved that the extent of their strategy is “leave it to Tesco”. But supermarkets helped to create this mess; they aren’t our saviours.

Nor can we rely on neighbouring countries to feed us. World leaders from Trump to Putin to Xi are busy securing their own food supplies and openly putting their own needs first. The liberal peaceful global order is dead. And Britain has worse trading relationships than ever. In 2016, we left the EU, a massive source of food stability. Before the EU, we had an empire feeding us, but that’s long gone — our former subjects haven’t forgotten that we abandoned trading with them fairly when we joined the EU.

Since then, Britain has grown addicted to just-in-time supermarket corporate structures. And this could be our downfall. This may be something no one wants to hear, but we need to hear it in order to make it better.

The answer is to be ready, with a more resilient and secure food system before something goes wrong. We need an inspired farming system that’s largely confined to our own island, and which we can rely upon in a crisis. There is no food security unless we can feed people locally in an emergency.

I spoke to Professor Tim Lang, a leading authority on food security and author of a forthcoming report for the National Preparedness Commission (NPC), about what the big “shocks” to our food supplies might be. Some are happening already, like climate change, and we have to adapt to be resilient to them. One in four UK homes is projected to flood by 2050. And our remaining fruit and vegetable production is concentrated in low plain places, like Lincolnshire, that are projected to flood with rising sea levels in the next century. According to Professor Lang, this means that we’ll have to move our horticulture “up the hill” in the years to come.

Climate change is also driving more extreme weather events globally that profoundly affect food supplies. This is already affecting crops in the fields and the availability of food staples. Twenty years ago, it would have been unthinkable that fruit and veg would be rationed in stores — but this has happened several times in the last few years. Whole areas overseas that feed us, like the greenhouses of Almeria in Spain, are becoming unviable as their water resources diminish. Production is moving further from home, often to Africa, increasing the risks.

Another potential shock is biodiversity loss, which can lead to ecosystem collapse that can wipe out crops from whole regions. The food industry is already worried about these risks. One 2024 report by the Institute of Grocery Distribution, “Resilience: A System Under Pressure”, highlights the risk inherent in our ageing farmer population. Labour is vital for production, and yet the average age of a UK farmer is 59 years old. The report also raises concerns that a botched roll-out of new farm support schemes might de-motivate farmers and discourage their investment in future production.

We can’t afford to ignore their warnings. The idea that we’d all be confined to our houses for months by a virus would have been considered science fiction prior to 2020, but now it’s a well understood scenario. Disaster planners have to model worse epidemics than Covid, and we need to be ready for them.

Perhaps the idea of being blockaded by submarines sounds a little unlikely, a strangely nostalgic fear left over from the Second World War. But war is far from over. There are three major conflicts affecting millions of people’s food supplies taking place right now.

The Israelis have used food supplies to try to bring their enemies to heel in Gaza, something that is illegal under international law. In Sudan, six million people are at risk of famine at present because of a civil war. And the Ukraine-Russia war has revolved heavily around food supplies — the Russians targeted Mariupol to gain control of Ukraine’s grain exports, and regularly target food markets to try to intimidate Ukrainians into ending their resistance. Britain is involved in the Ukraine conflict already, so it is not hard to imagine a scenario in which Russia sabotages Britain’s food system to punish us. Think less U-boats in the Atlantic, and more sabotage of computer software by bot-farms in Russia to collapse our logistics. A single electricity outage could crash our entire supermarket system overnight.

The Ukraine war has taught us that our farms are often reliant upon hidden foreign inputs — synthetic fertilisers drive current crop yields, and imported feedstuffs prop up our milk, meat, and egg industries. The war doesn’t have to touch English soil for it to cut the yields of our fields by around 20-30%.

As we know, bad things never happen one at a time. Shocks can come from several directions at once and compound the damage of each other. Imagine a flooded city loses its electricity during a severe epidemic. Now imagine there is a war elsewhere in Europe that prevents food supplies coming to that city. Figuring out how we might find, move, cook and serve food for millions of people in such a scenario is a serious business.

There is an old saying that we are only three days away from anarchy, particularly with a food system breakdown. Yet Professor Lang is more optimistic. He says that what we often see in a crisis is not social collapse but instead people working together, finding ways to ration or share, displaying the best of human nature. But even with a lot of good will, people need a certain number of calories every day to stay alive.

It’s worth pointing out, as Professor Lang does, that access to nutritious food is not guaranteed in Britain even without a geopolitical crisis of the kind I am imagining. Millions of British people are suffering from food insecurity right now. In 2022-23, 11% of the UK population lived in a household experiencing food poverty — including 17% of all children. That same year, 2.3 million people lived in a household that used a food bank. So poor is the British diet that the average five-year-old is now shorter than they were 20 years ago.

Add to this the fact that many British people have very poor access to, or else cannot afford, nutritious foodstuffs. Our diet of processed foods, full of salt, fat and sugar, is making us sick. In his recent report “The False Economy of Big Food”, Professor Tim Jackson estimates that our failing food system costs us £268 billion a year.

We don’t need a meteor or a war or even zombies to screw up our food system. For millions of vulnerable people, it is already broken. And they will be the hardest hit by any future shocks.

There are many farmers who use the “food security” argument as a way to say that farming can’t change. Leave us alone or there will be less food — I get it, but it’s a bad argument. Due to the rise of supermarkets and industrial technologies, farming has become massively specialised and monocultural. What’s needed is a food system that’s far more diverse.

We need lots more horticulture scattered all across the UK. We need orchards and urban farms. We need vast numbers of small and diverse food businesses to spread risks in the food system and avoid bottlenecks. And we need to support regenerative and nature-friendly farms that are less reliant upon imported inputs like synthetic fertilisers. Indeed, we need more farms not less, because giant simplified industrial farm systems are often the riskiest of all. Since they specialise in mass commodity production, they tend to grind to a halt when they can’t get rid of their pigs, chickens or milk because a processing plant stops working. They are also the most vulnerable to epidemics.

Furthermore, we need to create farms with closed nutrient cycles that utilise mixed livestock and cropping to restore soil and create resilience. We farmers can’t claim to be sustaining our food system’s future if we are degrading our soils — that strategy might produce cheap food right now, but only at the expense of our future. And no civilisation has ever survived that lets vital nutrients leak out of the food system. We need our waste to go back on our fields, rather than flushing it away.

Much of the farming we need, such as no-till organic horticulture, is human-intensive — it relies on human brains and skilled hands not magic bio-tech solutions. In order to make these changes, we’d need a whole new generation of brilliant farmers and some radical new thinking. Heaps of young people, including my daughter, want to farm, but the capital required to take on a giant industrial operation makes that a fantasy. We need starter farms, and opportunities for people from non-farming backgrounds to produce food and contribute.

If all this sounds fantastical and unlikely, just remember that our current food system is creating costs that are staggering. The status quo is not serving us. We can’t keep mindlessly copying a US food system that is fraught with costs and risks.

Change would require bold action and joined-up thinking across government departments. We seem to have lost faith in the government’s ability to solve problems. But remind yourself that we once rationed food to survive a wartime blockade. (Remarkably, the poorest 25% of the population were healthier under rationing than they had ever been before, with access to good food for the first time.) And remind yourself that we created the National Health Service. We can do hard things — and sometimes we have to.

Food system planning and delivery should be at the heart of progressive politics — a priority for investment, even in austerity. And it is an investment, not a subsidy. It will make us all healthier, happier, safer, and more affluent. It would benefit the poorest the most.

The current fight between the government and farmers about inheritance tax is staggeringly stupid. It is the wrong fight, with the wrong people, about the wrong issue, at the wrong time. It is terrible politics because the list of things we need from our farmers is long and growing. We need to help them, not undermine them, so they can invest to create the healthy real food production we need. After all, history is littered with civilisations that collapsed because they were unsustainable.

This whole shift requires a standard of political leadership that doesn’t exist at present. And leadership at the local level as much as in Westminster. We need to be more like the French and Italians, empowering local government and mayors to restrict the growth of supermarkets and fast-food outlets, and instead prioritising local and healthier real food growers and sellers.

The truth is we’ve gambled too long already on a risky and failing system. The world around us grows ever more hostile and we have chosen to be a stand-alone geopolitical unit. Whatever you think of how we got here, that’s our reality. We now need to do the work of building a strong and healthy food system for Britain.


James Rebanks is a fell farmer and the best-selling author of The Shepherd’s Life. His latest book is The Place of Tides.

herdyshepherd1

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

158 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Susan Grabston
Susan Grabston
30 days ago

Thank you for drawing attention to this important issue. The UK has the shortest food supply.chains in the world – US colleagues would.regularly.come to.London.to boggle at our.chilled chain systens.
Knowing the risks and as a believer in the 4th turning thesis I decided to become self sufficient. It took me a year.to understand basics of growing composting, and succession planting, a year to do it with some decent crops, and a year to streamline it and master preservation (both fermentation and canning). This year I’m starting to learn.about seed saving … bluntly preparedness takes time as with any new skill. We should indeed be encouraging everyone to grow what they can, where they can. Hydroponics and vertical growing increase the possibility, and it is an intensely.satisfying activity (studies show connection to nature to be one of the 3 essentials for psychological wellbeing).
Keep up the good work on this one – we will be reading more.and more about it, and not just from a cost of living perspective. Dig/plant for Britain is going to make a return.

Marsha D
Marsha D
29 days ago
Reply to  Susan Grabston

As an urban farmer on my allotment (it’s definitely not genteel ‘gardening’), I have begun to understand the knowledge & labour that goes into feeding ourselves.
We will reap what we sow.

Tony Taylor
Tony Taylor
30 days ago

Surely the UK government has a plan for such a crisis?

Nope. No sheds. No stores. No mountains of food. No plan.

Plans? Who needs plans? There were plans for Covid, but as soon as the pandemic started, governments filled their pants in panic and ignored their plans.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
30 days ago
Reply to  Tony Taylor

That’s not the worst of his faux pas.

“No civilisation has ever survived that lets vital nutrients leak out of its food system”.

Whilst an example would’ve been useful, the author didn’t provide one since it’d hardly stand up to scrutiny. The concept of nutrient depletion is relatively recent, based on scientific understanding of what nutrients are, and whilst crop rotation and “fallow fields” were understood by our ancestors has anyone ever heard of an entire “civilisation” that failed because of not understanding it?

Droughts, yes. It’s thought some prehistoric South American cultures may have fallen at least partly due to not ‘propitiating their rain gods’ but the idea they understood soil science is ridiculous; and unless they did, they couldn’t have “let” nutrient depletion occur in the way the author suggests.

tintin lechien
tintin lechien
30 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

3 people gave you the thumb down? Why?

John Ramsden
John Ramsden
29 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

Not a perfect example by any means, but I read that in the early Middle Ages people of the feudal society in the UK and perhaps elsewhere were seriously depleting their fields through over-use. As a result, crop yields were declining steadily, until the Black Death felled a large proportion of the population and that gave the environment as chance to renew itself.

Norfolk Sceptic
Norfolk Sceptic
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

Just as vitamin D depletion was common among those that succumbed to the recent global medical event, I expect not ‘depleting their fields’ would have hindered the spread of the Black Death.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

As i made clear, that misses the vital point of understanding soil science in terms of nutrients – the author’s own term.
Thinking it’s a good idea to rotate crops / let fields lie fallow for a year because it helps with yield is nothing like how the author describes it. That’s about quantity, not quality. Is there an example you can cite of where a civilisation failed because of it?

Jane Cobbald
Jane Cobbald
29 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

You can see nutrient leakage. Take a walk (on a public footpath of course) over any single-crop arable field. In most that I have walked over at this time of year, the soil is either a hard pan or a mudbath. It’s not nutritious soil. Nutrient-rich soil, such as that in a well-tended allotment or garden border, or underneath permanent grassland is darker, crumbly, sweet-smelling … ALIVE.
Let alone the run-off of all that valuable topsoil from ploughed fields after a rainstorm.

Tony Taylor
Tony Taylor
27 days ago
Reply to  Jane Cobbald

Councils and developers are building estates over some of our lushest solis here in Victoria. It’s an obscene thing to look enabled by people taking obscene liberties.

Jane Cobbald
Jane Cobbald
29 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

You can see nutrient leakage. Take a walk (on a public footpath of course) over any single-crop arable field. In most that I have walked over at this time of year, the soil is either a hard pan or a mudbath. It’s not nutritious soil. Nutrient-rich soil, such as that in a well-tended allotment or garden border, or underneath permanent grassland is darker, crumbly, sweet-smelling … ALIVE.
Let alone the run-off of all that valuable topsoil from ploughed fields after a rainstorm.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
29 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

There are various concerns over several fcators which are reducing soil fertility. Tthe decline in the element composition of the soil. There are about 17 elements needed for plants to grow and a few more for animals. Once the soil is depleted in elements putting element deficient compost and/or manure on the soil will not solve the problems. Next there is the decline in the humic content; some soils in E Anglia are down to 2%.
Soil compaction producing plough pans beneath which anaerobic conditions produce alcohol which kills roots and above, shallow root system whuch suffer from drought.

Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
19 days ago
Reply to  Lancashire Lad

I’m also fairly certain human waste would make for terrible fertilizer. Been a while since I took that one farming class in high school, but I seem to recall that fertilizer is typically made from the waste of primary consumers, obligate vegetarians and grass/leaf eaters in particular, because it has by far the most nutrients to put back in the soil. The waste of omnivores like humans that eat a mixed diet of meat/fruits/nuts/etc. is less useful, and that’s before we discuss the various drugs we consume or the possibility of spreading diseases. This author doesn’t seem to realize that after we flush, our waste goes into a sewage treatment system where it’s collected, concentrated, and treated before it can be released into the environment. Since the system is already collecting the waste and bringing it together, that’s a significant manufacturing task, collecting raw resources, in the production of fertilizer, or it would be if fertilizer based on human waste was actually a product someone would buy. It isn’t. If human waste could be made into fertilizer profitably, somebody or everybody would already be doing it. I’m sure there are scientists working for waste management companies and environmental groups working on possible ways to profitably process sewage into fertilizer or at least extract some of the basic components for fertilizer, but the absence of companies already doing this suggests it can’t be done reliably or profitably yet. As things stand, I’m fairly certain that the industrial farming of cattle, sheep, and other livestock is the biggest producer of the fertilizer needed to keep up the yields of our ordinary sustenance crops. The reality is a good deal more complicated than this author’s probably environmentalist/naturalist inspired preconceptions.

Norfolk Sceptic
Norfolk Sceptic
29 days ago
Reply to  Tony Taylor

Plans? They are for STEM people: the Intelligentsia don’t need them. Well, they haven’t up to now, and look how far up the greasy pole they have climbed.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
30 days ago

In the UK there was a drive for ever cheaper food following WW2. Over the long term has that actually benefitted us? It did to start with but a few generations later we are overweight and have just used the money saved to pay for houses instead, helping to drive up their prices.

Andrew Buckley
Andrew Buckley
30 days ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

Yep – the proportion of household income spent on food and related items has gone down and down. (cheaper stuff). And all that this has resulted in is an increase in consumerism and a higher spend on accommodation.

Brian Kneebone
Brian Kneebone
30 days ago

We always hear of so much food wasted. Maybe some of this (able to be stored) should placed in secure, local depots for a rainy day.
Food for thought!

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  Brian Kneebone

A lot of the waste comes from stored food going bad or being eaten by animals. It’s really hard to cut down on the waste of food. Not that we shouldn’t try, but we shouldn’t expect too much either.

Douglas Redmayne
Douglas Redmayne
30 days ago

This is just self interested doomerism.

Peter Shevlin
Peter Shevlin
29 days ago

I think it’s meant to make people stop and think. Unfortunately the majority of those commenting on this seem to be incapable of such an exercise as it interferes with their own belief system. It was ever thus and that is why humans have been so susceptible to cataclysmic events throughout history. I would recommend an excellent book on the subject, just out, “Ignorance and Bliss” but I would bet a considerable amount that the few on here still capable of reading an extended text would not bother lest it disturbs them.

Lancashire Lad
Lancashire Lad
29 days ago
Reply to  Peter Shevlin

It’s not just the reading of it, but the comprehension.

tintin lechien
tintin lechien
30 days ago

I stop reading when the write mentions climate change being a cause of food shortage / having an adverse effect on food production. What nonsense. We have never had more agricultural production since farming started by the early geniuses. It is the net zero and climate change ideologues who want to stop this progress and want to starve us. WEF and Bill Gates et al want to depopulate the earth. They have invented disgusting fake meat and force us to eat insects etc. Time we stopped listening to them and debunk these evil ideologies.

Patrick Martin
Patrick Martin
29 days ago

Not the time, then, for an attack on family farms and plastering fertile land with solar panels.

Mike Michaels
Mike Michaels
29 days ago
Reply to  Patrick Martin

It is if your aim is to depopulate the planet by 90%.

ChilblainEdwardOlmos
ChilblainEdwardOlmos
29 days ago
Reply to  Mike Michaels

Sigh

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  Patrick Martin

If man made climate change is real, and it is imperative we stop relying on fossil fuels, why aren’t the politicians demanding, legislating, that the sides and roofs of new build skyscrapers/high rises be fitted with solar panels as a condition of their planning approval, or that older offices and housing stock be retrofitted with solar panels. Most of the demand for power comes from the cities, it seems only fair that they carry the brunt, rather than having solar `farms’ and taking arable land out of production and killing migratory birds with wind farms. Almost as if someone has designs on our food security

Bruce Luffman
Bruce Luffman
29 days ago

As an ex farmer, I lost interest in this article and its message when the author started quoting Dr Lang – a man who I have never listened to since he started his theories over 40 years ago and who believes that a small change in climate is horrendous when the slighter higher CO2 is having a huge beneficial effect on feeding the world’s population.
NB – CO2 makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere!!
We have to get behind farmers and maintain their existence as well as crush the horrendous policy of Net Zero. The slight change in climate has not brought more weather disasters – look back over the last 120 years, it is the same throughout – it is called weather and this nonsense pushed by politicians and powerful Davos types is what is going to cause the possible disastrous outcomes to the food supply..

Norfolk Sceptic
Norfolk Sceptic
29 days ago
Reply to  Bruce Luffman

When the Climate Delusion has been discarded, there’s going to be so many books that will need new editions, to remove the ridiculous texts.

Susie Bell
Susie Bell
29 days ago
Reply to  Bruce Luffman

Well said Bruce. We live on a planet, it’s not a climate controlled hotel suite. I sometimes wonder if the colossal egos at work in Davos and governments think they can control the weather because they want to. I find it funny that the net zero crowd are always quoting worst this, driest that, wettest the other, exactly how long have accurate weather records been kept? Even in nerdy societies like Britain the records have occupied the blink of an eye in terms of forecasting from existing data.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
28 days ago
Reply to  Susie Bell

The first systematic records starts with the Met Office in about 1850s. Any reliable recording of temperature is restricted to NW Europe and NE N America from about 1870s.
THe number of thermometers used had declined form about 6000 to 1500.
In much of the developing World weather stations are located at airports because planes need the data to land safely. Cut down a jungle /forests etc and build a runway increases temperature. Cities expand. What was rural in 1870 can be in the middle of an urban area today. The centre of Lon is 2 to 3 degrees warmer than 20 mills outside of the built up area.
For those who believe in man made Global Warming, would you want to fly, use a ship or live in a high rise building where knowledge of the strength of materials was as poor as that of our weather ? Name any computer programmer who has ever admitted the £10sM spent on computer systems they have created are a waste of money ?
Baron Ives was asked why Rolls Royce was so good , he replied
 “I suppose it’s because we are a little better at putting our mistakes right than most of the other people.”[18]
Ernest Hives, 1st Baron Hives – Wikipedia
Anyone in the Man Made Global Warming set who has Hives record of achievement ?

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
29 days ago
Reply to  Bruce Luffman

What has taken place is that people have changed the land surface and built where they should not have . Cutting down trees in Himalayas has increased volume and rate of run off: abstracting groundwater has caused land to subside and overpopulation has caused people to live in areas previously too risky due to flooding.
Where slopes are steep, people cut down vegetation and even into them and then build on top of them, rainfall will cause disasters.
Land rises and falls, sea levels rise and fall. Combine the two and one has complicated inter- actions.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  Charles Hedges

And in the UK we are tarmacking front gardens for parking and making the motorways ever wider, drainage grates are clogged up from leaf debris that the councils don’t clean and yet people are surprised when there are floods. Apparently no one knows that heavy rains need drainage.
Then comes summer and we’re in drought because no one thought to store the rainwater from the winter, and the water companies are too busy giving dividends to their shareholders and bonuses to their CEO to fix the damn pipes.
London whines about the heat and climate change when it is big cities like London that hold the heat
No one in Government wants to do the unglamorous things or look to the long view and do anything they won’t get credit for because that doesn’t get them the votes.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
28 days ago
Reply to  LindaMB

LindaMB, good points. Speaking to people who clean out drains the organisation in charge needs to know exactly the location of all the drains and how often they need to clean them out. People have left and knowledge has gone with them. When organisations were re-organised and digitized old plans, many were lost in the process.

ChilblainEdwardOlmos
ChilblainEdwardOlmos
29 days ago
Reply to  Bruce Luffman

Spot on.

John Tyler
John Tyler
29 days ago
Reply to  Bruce Luffman

Whilst agreeing with some of what you say I think your oversimplification of the ramifications of CO2 increase as alarming as some climate scientists’ scare-mongering. Whether man-made or natural (in reality, of course, probably both) global warming is very real and the low proportion of CO2 increase the atmosphere is irrelevant; it only takes a small quantitative rise to cause quite a dramatic effect. In my opinion we’d all be better off if looked at global warming calmly and rationally rather than treating it as a zero sum game.

Gerry Quinn
Gerry Quinn
29 days ago
Reply to  John Tyler

Two facts:
CO2, despite its small proportion in the atmosphere, really does have a very significant effect on heat capture from the Sun.
CO2 is also plant food, and its increase has led to a significant amount of ‘greening’ in the Earth’s biosphere.
From Nature’s perspective, this really is six of one and half a dozen of the other. And we will adapt too, though not always as comfortably as we would like to. But it does make sense to minimise the shock as distinct from just ignoring the effects.

John Ramsden
John Ramsden
29 days ago

Although not a full-on prepper, I maintain a couple of hundred tins of tuna in sunflower oil, cycling round them, and a hundredweight (whatever that is in Kg) bag of rice in the freezer, and, among a few other odds & sods, and last but not least some bottles of potassium iodide pills in case the balloon seriously goes up! And, no, I’m not saying where I live! 🙂

Alphonse Pfarti
Alphonse Pfarti
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

Are you Jimmy from The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin by any chance?

David Lonsdale
David Lonsdale
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

What powers your freezer?

ChilblainEdwardOlmos
ChilblainEdwardOlmos
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

Why do you freeze rice? It just needs to be kept dry which is easy enough in an airtight container.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

The Mormons used to be big on each family maintaining a year’s supply of food. Not so much anymore.

John Lamble
John Lamble
29 days ago

I stopped reading at the baloney about ‘climate change’. Just one comment: Labour hates farmers and the countryside so it has a policy to downgrade UK farming at just the exact moment when it might again become vital. Of course it does!

Pete Pritchard
Pete Pritchard
29 days ago

You definitely need guns and ammo.

ChilblainEdwardOlmos
ChilblainEdwardOlmos
29 days ago
Reply to  Pete Pritchard

That horse has left the barn, er… the ship has long left that island’s port.

Jonathan Nash
Jonathan Nash
29 days ago

“One in four UK homes is projected to flood by 2050. And our remaining fruit and vegetable production is concentrated in low plain places, like Lincolnshire, that are projected to flood with rising sea levels in the next century.”
I bet this is not true. A correct statement would be that some models based on certain assumptions produce one outcome along these lines: whether or not this outcome is the central case; whether the assumptions are correct; and how sensitive the model is to changes in the assumptions, are all matters one would have to consider before deciding what to do about this supposed scenario. As we learned, or should have learned, from Covid: models do not produce “projections” or forecasts.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  Jonathan Nash

If it’s destined to flood by 2050, why are we not building dykes? The Netherlands has been holding back the North Sea for centuries

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
29 days ago

The ‘localised’ food system as suggested by Mr Rebanks might be wonderful (but very probably wouldn’t be) but the one thing it would definitely be is very expensive. Think farm shop style prices for everything. £5 for a loaf of bread, several quid for a kilo of spuds, £30 for a joint of beef. And of course far less choice, because you can only have what the locality can supply at any given time. This is what the localisers never point out – how much it would impact the masses, because if they did let on they’d be told where to go in no uncertain terms.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

It would simply mean going back to eat like Britain did in the 60’s, when we were actually healthier. Seasonal fruits and vegetables, meat from the local butchers, knowing where your food has come from; how is that bad? Most of what is in people’s trolleys, isn’t fruit and vegetables, or joints of beef. It’s processed foods, fizzy drinks, crisps, ready meals…..with the occasional salad or apple thrown in for appearance sake.
We stopped buying ultra processed foods, and buy-for the most part- from local sources. It costs about £10 extra per week/shop; we’ve never paid £5.00 for a loaf of bread from our local bakery, nor several quid for a kilo of spuds from the local `green’ grocers

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  LindaMB

Where does your local greengrocer get the spuds you buy?

William Cameron
William Cameron
29 days ago

No food security – no fuel security – no defence budget. Some civil service ?

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
29 days ago

Ah. Once I got to “climate change” and “The Israelis have used food supplies to try to bring their enemies to heel in Gaza” nonsense, I summarily chalked this up and another Leftist screed courtesy of UnHerd. Really guys, their may be a good reason why bilge like this is better left unheard, no?

Norfolk Sceptic
Norfolk Sceptic
29 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Or unsubscribed.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

I don’t agree with a lot of what the author says, but this article is well thought out and makes some good points. It’s no screed.

Climate change is a problem (though it’s not clear how big). The Israelis are starving the Gazans (though it’s not clear how justified that is).

Thanks to UnHerd for publishing this. Judging from the comments to this article, we need more like it.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
23 days ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

Actually this is the first conflict where one of the adversaries is apparently honour bound to feed the enemy. The fact is that they do, sending thousands of tons of food in every week, but sadly most of it is stolen by their leaders and sold to the population at inflated prices or stored for their own use in their tunnels. If the Gazans are striving I suggest you have a word with the Hamas leaders.

Anthony Roe
Anthony Roe
29 days ago

Couldn’t get any truffle oil at Waitrose yesterday.

Alan Bright
Alan Bright
29 days ago
Reply to  Anthony Roe

And there’s no ciabatta anywhere

Max Beran
Max Beran
29 days ago
Reply to  Anthony Roe

Patum Peperium but no Bath Olivers. The sky is indeed falling.

Chris Quayle
Chris Quayle
29 days ago

Even more disastrous is the total lack of vision, policy and timeline to solve the energy supply crisis. Nearly everything is dependent on a reliable and affordable energy supply system. A genuine national security issue, but the psychotic obsession with the net zero project is blind to that, will drive this country into chaos and societal breakdown. Will they ever wake up as to how serious it really is ?.

John Tyler
John Tyler
29 days ago

“ a standard of political leadership that doesn’t exist at present”

What’s missing is statesmanship.

mac mahmood
mac mahmood
29 days ago

But a whole host of people here on UnHerd do not believe in climate change!

Max Beran
Max Beran
29 days ago
Reply to  mac mahmood

Probably in large part because it is a “belief” system rather than a technical issue subject to the normal standards of scrutinising such assertions.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
29 days ago
Reply to  Max Beran

Every body, whether solid, liquid or gaseous, including the Earth, emits electromagnetic ­radiation.

The wavelengths of radiation emitted depend upon the temperature of the body. As a relatively cool body, the Earth emits only long-wave heat radiation in the infrared range.

The radiation emitted by one body can be reflected or absorbed by other bodies. It is primarily the molecules of the trace or greenhouse gases that absorb the long-wave radiation and ultimately emit it again in all directions as heat ­radiation. They thus trap part of the heat in the lower atmosphere.

https://worldoceanreview.com/en/wor-6/the-polar-regions-as-components-of-the-global-climate-system/why-it-is-so-cold-in-the-polar-regions/the-earths-heat-and-radiation-balance/

A change in the amount of greenhouse gases therefore changes the temperature of the lower atmosphere.

This is all very basic physics. What ‘belief system’ are you using to decide that a change in temperature of the lower atmosphere will have no effect on climate?

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
29 days ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

Two downvotes, but no responses for nothing but basic science.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

But the amount the temperature changes depends on how much of the greenhouse gas is already present. It’s a logarithmic relationship, not an exponential one. There are confounding factors that will distort the effect as well.

The earth’s climate is a complex adaptive system where cause and effect are hard to puzzle out. Those who rely on basic physics to construct a model are likely to be way off. Its like crashing two tiny cars together and expect that cause to have the same effect as crashing two full-size cars.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
28 days ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

‘But the amount the temperature changes depends on how much of the greenhouse gas is already present’ is of course true and for completeness I should have said that the change in concentration of the greenhouse gas needs to affect the amount of infrared radiation trapped. But the concentration changes known to have happened since the 1800s are known to affect the heat absorbed and this is still within the realm of fairly basic physics.

I haven’t said anything about constructing a model – that comes after the basic physics. I’ve merely said that ‘a change in the amount of greenhouse gases therefore changes the temperature of the lower atmosphere.’ As you’ve said what comes after that is far more complex.

I was responding to someone that said climate change ‘is a “belief” system rather than a technical issue subject to the normal standards of scrutinising such assertions.’ But the basic physics irrefutably says that something will change, and no belief system is required to that point. But a belief system is required to assume that there will not be substantial change once the temperature of the lower atmosphere increases, and I queried what that was.

Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
29 days ago

“The Israelis have used food supplies to try to bring their enemies to heel in Gaza, something that is illegal under international law.”
So was Oct. 7, not that you could tell it by the behavior of the international community since.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
29 days ago
Reply to  Daniel Lee

Not to mention the ongoing truckloads of food supplied by Israel that are then hijacked by Hamas. Remind me, how much food did Britain supply to Germany during WW II?

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
23 days ago
Reply to  Daniel Lee

There isn’t evidence for Israel doing this – quite the opposite. The UN and such are corrupt with anti-semitism, so cannot be believed. Trucks being hi-jacked by Hamas for themselves despite of the needs of ‘it’s own people’ have been video’d by drones.
When I read these sorts of tropes in an article, I can’t help but turn away from what otherwise is being argued, because it sickens me.
This isn’t a reply to Daniel Lee really; but a further response to Rebanks’ comment that Lee also quotes…

Kayla Marx
Kayla Marx
20 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Agree. It had the look of a really cheap shot.

Jack Martin Leith
Jack Martin Leith
29 days ago

and a deep freezer
Powered by what?
Better get also get ready for no phone, no Internet, no Alexa, no AI and no fuel.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago

Cash is king, gold is god.

Jane Cobbald
Jane Cobbald
29 days ago

I found this to be a brilliant and timely article. Thank you James – and I think your concerns are valid.

Santiago Excilio
Santiago Excilio
29 days ago

Hmmm. Food safety. Yes, UK supply chains are short and very JIT. No buffer capacity. Weakest point major RDCs located in Corby area. Block/damage and supermarkets run out in a day or two and households two days after that. Day 6 – food riots. But this is well known. There are other weaknesses too.

As for the rest… climate change, yawn. Food poverty rampant but also the second most obese country in Europe? Yawn. Professor Lang? Double yawn. What we need is a centrally planned food delivery strategy with linked up government departments? Puurlease! “Turnip production is up in Spalding Collective, Comrades, Rejoice!” He’ll be recommending Lamarckism next and digging out the Lysenko…. And if the average age of farmers is 59 and the industry crying out for young blood then probably not the smartest time to bang IHT in farms and cut ABR.

Marsha D
Marsha D
29 days ago

The author is talking about food security… not safety.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago

You might disagree with what the author says, but he is no Trofim Lysenko.

JR Hartley
JR Hartley
29 days ago

It does not even need a war. A full electricity grid shutdown, the power could be off for days. No banking, shops closed, no phones. No trucks delivering anything, as there’s no computers. Power cuts like this will be frequent once Europe stops selling us electricity.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  JR Hartley

In Ontario there is a shared electrical grid with the US eastern seaboard. In August 2003 an overgrown tree shorted out 3 (droopy) transmission lines in northern Ohio, USA. The Northeast blackout lasted for 2hrs-4 days depending on location. It shut down 100 electrical plants, and 22 nuclear power plants. We were asked to conserve energy and water. Cell phone were paper weights (the land lines still worked), traffic lights stopped functioning, people were stuck in the subway, in elevators, in mines, cash machines stopped working, a/c didn’t work, water couldn’t be pumped to the higher floors of apartment buildings (the elderly were trapped there) so bottled water was brought in to be carried up, food perished as freezers stopped working, the only place that still had hot food to purchase was the local Burger King which cooked using a flame grill.
That was one tree. The night sky was lovely though.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
23 days ago
Reply to  JR Hartley

So when you think you have a month’s supply of food in the freezer you will not be pleased when you have no electricity for that period.

John Stokes
John Stokes
29 days ago

1 in 4 homes will flood by 2050? From where did you get this figure? If you mean sea level rises, then one of the most pessimistic estimate of sea level rise is 0.21m or 8 inches by 2050 (IPCC 6th Assessment Report Sea Level Projections). While there will be some flooding of low-lying coastal regions, it won’t be as catastrophic as you suggest. But do you mean increased storms and rain? Yet you also suggest drought and desert. Which one is it? No-one really knows: long-term climate predictions are unreliable.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  John Stokes

If the sea does flood arable land then salt deposits will damage it. However, we’ve known about dykes & pumps for centuries, and the Netherlands has been successfully holding back the sea since the 15th century. It’s not like we don’t have the technology to solve the problem.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  John Stokes

Many things are unpredictable in the details but have general trends that are evident. That doesn’t mean we can’t, or shouldn’t, make plans for an uncertain future. I don’t know how long I am going to live, but I don’t go spending all my money but instead plan in the face of uncertainty.

Susie Bell
Susie Bell
29 days ago

The whole of the EU is also vulnerable, not our saviour, as the commission has indulged set aside, species proliferation on land left uncultivated, an over reliance on the industrial food complex who pull in stock from the whole world. If push comes to shove we could feed ourselves but everyone would have to learn how to peel veg, cook, not be wasteful. We would have to live without the snack industry, pot noodles, ready meals, take ways. I know there are more of us in the Kingdom than during the war but farming methods have hugely increased yields and we could mostly cope. But we would have to learn to eat seasonally again and not expect to have strawberries in December but be content eating the strawberry jam we made in July. The climate change schtick is tiresome and vastly overstated. The crisis is always around the corner, look at Al Gore’s predictions for the current decade, half of us should have drowned or starved. But be sensible now and keep some food in and get a generator to keep the freezer going!

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  Susie Bell

We would have to stop importing a million extra people per year

Fiona Hok
Fiona Hok
29 days ago

“The Israelis have used food supplies to try to bring their enemies to heel in Gaza, something that is illegal under international law.” This is not true. Twitter is full of dated camera shots of food supplies on the GazA border. The food is coming. Some organisation is not distributing it.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  Fiona Hok

Hamas is raiding the trucks

Владимр Смит
Владимр Смит
29 days ago
Reply to  Fiona Hok

The author is not very educated, or he is too lazy to look for truthful information, I would like to say as a Ukrainian who does not support Zelensky. The Russians are not shelling Mariupol because this has been Russian territory for two years. They sometimes shell Odessa port facilities in order to prevent the shipment of military cargo, because Zelensky’s gang sends grain on the same cargo ships on which weapons were delivered, the Russians stopped this, they do not need weapons supplies.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  Fiona Hok

No, the food is not coming. Malnutrition is rampant. Most of the housing, electrical and water infrastructure, schools and hospitals have been destroyed. Gaza is a hellhole. Yet the Israelis still relentlessly attack.

I have long been a strong supporter of Israel. Not anymore. What they are doing in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria is horrific and inhumane. It needs to stop.

Colin Haller
Colin Haller
28 days ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

You are a rare realist around here.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
23 days ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

Sadly you have obviously not thought what all those countries you mention would do to Israel if it stopped defending itself. Inhumane would not even begin to cover it.

John Murray
John Murray
29 days ago

“Change would require bold action and joined-up thinking across government departments. We seem to have lost faith in the government’s ability to solve problems. But remind yourself that we once rationed food to survive a wartime blockade. (Remarkably, the poorest 25% of the population were healthier under rationing than they had ever been before, with access to good food for the first time.)”
Rah! Tally ho! The sky is the limit!
“And remind yourself that we created the National Health Service.”
Oh, dear.
Yeah, I just remembered that.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
29 days ago

As soon as someone starts on about climate change “projections” i stop reading. If you are not smart enough to have figured out that scam ( based on bullshit comp science modelling )then you arent really worth my while.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

You are right to be skeptical of climate modeling. The claims many climate scientists make do seem to be a scam to get grant money. But the basic idea that the increased greenhouse gases in the air are causing increased heating is basic physics that needs no model to explain.

We can’t predict how bad the changes to our climate will be, or if they will even be bad at all, but we should prepare as best we can for a range of possibilities. We humans with our huge cities and our staggering populations are felling forests, killing off other animals, and paving over our paradise. The lighter we can make our footprint, the better earth we will leave for those who come after us.

Climate change is only one concern. Food, as this article points out, is another.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
27 days ago
Reply to  Carlos Danger

Read “fake apocalyse and threars of doom” patrick moore if you have an open mind on it

Sean Lothmore
Sean Lothmore
29 days ago

The Transition Town movement started up a while ago in response to the threat of peak oil (ha!). In spite of its Totnes vibe, the general idea is worth considering: a complicated society like ours should have layers of local fallback positions in place should complexity fail.
After all, why do people join foraging bands, tribes, villages, or nations? For security, including against food scarcity. A nation that doesn’t provide this is not fulfilling its purpose.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
29 days ago

Britain has been close to starvation due to U Boats in WW1 and WW2. The threat of U Boats was recognised in WW1 but the only Naval officer who specialised in anti U boat warfare between the wars was Captain Frederick ( Johnny ) Walker RN DSO and Three Bars. Also the docks were not large enought to take the convoys in WW2 so many ships were lost in bombing raids; there was lack of food storage and the flour mills were in East Anglia not Liverpool and Glasow where the convoys docked. The rail struggled to move grain from the docks to the flour mills.
There wass massive agricultural depression from 1870 to 1939 resulting in many fields becoming fallow.
In 1914 and 1939 Germany produced far of the food it needed than Britain.
In the 1950s Britain hd the largest merchant fleet in the World. Men of the calibre of Sir Nick Cayzer Bt warned various governments about the declibne but were ignored.
The Establishment ” by that I mean politicians, civil servants, lawyers, judges, academics, union leaders, intellectuals, journalists, most of The City have since the late 1950s comprised suburban clerks with no experience of combat, especially naval warfare, World Affairs,technology and resources. To make matters worse most of the Labour Party and some of the Tory Party comprise middle class surban clerks who despise farmers and the countryside.
A simple question; what were the events which took place in the late 1960s which altered trade ?

Steve Gwynne
Steve Gwynne
29 days ago

Landworkers’ Alliance
Ecological Land Cooperative
Oxford Real Farming Conference
Community Supported Agriculture Network UK
Organic Growers Alliance (OGA)
Pasture for Life (PFL)
Soil Association
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR)

Might be worth attending the Oxford Real Farming Conference.

https://orfc.org.uk/book-orfc-2025-tickets/

ChilblainEdwardOlmos
ChilblainEdwardOlmos
29 days ago

You were doing fine until your dive down the specious dive down the climate change is causing more extreme weather events rabbit hole. That’s merely causative speculation. Reap what you’ve sown globalists.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
29 days ago

“Nope. No sheds. No stores. No mountains of food. No plan.“

Has no one else considered this IS the plan?

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
29 days ago

The mark of a good Unherd article is one that creates lots of comments. This article has certainly achieved that!

Xaven Taner
Xaven Taner
29 days ago

I plan to eat my neighbours.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  Xaven Taner

What if they have the same plan?

Dougie Undersub
Dougie Undersub
29 days ago

We certainly need to take food security very seriously but the author lost me when he started on the climate b0llocks. Something that happens at such a (one might say, literally,) glacial pace cannot be a surprise, let alone a shock. And even the IPCC acknowledges that extreme weather events are not becoming more frequent. Sea level is rising at the steady pace of 20cm per century, as it has done for a very long time.
The author is, however, correct that once agriculture and food distribution is all done using EVs, a single cyber attack on the grid will leave us simultaneously stuffed and hungry.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
29 days ago

I live in western Canada, and I will tell you that Justin Trudeau and his environmental minister, Steven Guilbeault, are determined to create food shortages by their overriding belief that we must eliminate fossil fuels (which we have plenty of in western Canada). They continually attack farmers and make life impossible for them. Canada is a total mess. However, when thinking of climate change,there will be winners as well as losers. If northern countries become warmer, they will produce more food. There has always been climate change, and it would be better to prepare for it and spend money on adaption rather than trying to prevent it. It is total arrogance to think we can prevent climate change.

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  UnHerd Reader

Of course we cannot prevent climate change. But is it total arrogance to try to soften its blows? A good objective is to try to shift our societies to something “sustainable”, where our impact on the earth won’t destroy it.

Justin Trudeau and others are trying to make that shift too quickly, and their efforts are backfiring. That doesn’t mean we can’t have the same objective, but move at a wiser pace. I think we should. Our natural world is disappearing, and once gone, it won’t be coming back.

I don’t agree with some of what this author says, but his main themes are the same as mine.

Samuel Ross
Samuel Ross
29 days ago

Hundreds and thousands of trucks of FREE FOOD enter Gaza daily. No, the Israelis aren’t “using food supplies to try to bring their enemies to heel in Gaza, something that is illegal under international law”, something the author blithely puts in there to pad out his otherwise engrossing article.

I happen to PAY for my groceries, but the Gazans live freely off the largesse of the world, mostly the Christian nations, of which the UK is one.

Andrew F
Andrew F
29 days ago

How strange that author does not mention overpopulation both of uk and planet in general.
So in uk, the biggest contribution to food security would be to stop mass immigration.
Globally, it would be reduction in population of useless countries, mostly Muslims and Africans.
You stop providing food for them and population would find its natural level.
Probably 30% of current population.

Katalin Kish
Katalin Kish
29 days ago

Perhaps the most destructive war ever fought is already in progress via technology crimes not seen, not understood, not showing up in any statistics/records beyond desperate public interest disclosures like mine here. Some of the consequences show up in increased production/insurance costs, events like a ship drifting into Baltimore Bridge. Acts leading to these outcomes are prosecution proof, because our pre-information-age laws demand physical world-based crime evidence. In the vast majority of these crimes it is impossible to prove that a crime has been committed, let alone proving anyone’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

I am a public servant witness to crimes punishable by many years in jail so outraged & horrified, I lost the ability to fear anything. Living in Australia is a hard-earned privilege for me. I was a refugee turned migrant success story owning my own home since 2001 in one of Melbourne’s leafy suburbs, until a world-championship win in 2009 turned me into a devastated crime-tech-demo dummy. I lost my ability to earn a salary to crimes in 2017. I exhausted all legal avenues to have at least on record the crimes I am forced to live with by the end of 2018 & failed. My only alternative to fighting back via public interest disclosures like this one is suicide. There is no escape from the MARCUCCI, only one of Australia’s crime dynasties proudly featuring police officers & insiders from the Australian Signals Directorate, our military, etc. I never even dated the stalker ex-coworker who chose me as a crime-tech-demo-dummy, I only know the MARCUCCI through their crime gluttony.

Australia’s most dangerous criminals have always been police officers. They shifted crime witness elimination from gruesome murders since Sallie-Anne Huckstepp to discreditation via bizarre crimes committed against us via vastly disproportionate means & via using DARPA-grade remote weapons against us in our own homes. Since 2019 in my case. My last forced warcrime experience was today, 22 December 2024 at approximately 7:28am. I am writing this at 2:30pm.

Symptoms of this war include organised crime running the CFMEU, Australia’s most powerful union holding our governments to ransom, bankrupting the state of Victoria already, worse is inevitably in the pipelines, while people are distracted with netzero pipe-dreams: there won’t be anyone left on planet earth to worry about the flooding of crop plains in a few decades, unless we attend to government/military-grade technology in organised crime arsenals.

The enemy is amongst us working at government/military entities with access to technology not known, let alone understood by civilians. Because opportunity makes thieves everywhere. Mick GATTO, Australia’s 21st century Al CAPONE equivalent brags about being able to stop anyone doing anything for good reasons. For background see 60 Minutes, “Building Bad” on YouTube: remove spaces from https :// youtu.be /EuoWv-VKvy0 For some of the technologies used with devastating consequences see my ‘Contactless Extortion’ LinkedIn article.

#ididnotstaysilent

Joe Gaspad
Joe Gaspad
29 days ago

I was wih you all the way until I got to “And remind yourself that we created the National Health Service. We can do hard things…”

John Davis
John Davis
29 days ago

“So poor is the British diet that the average five-year-old is now shorter than they were 20 years ago.”
– That’s nothing to do with diet, it’s the effect of the rising immigrant population putting a swerve into the statistics.

“One in four UK homes is projected to flood by 2050.”
– Just no. Likewise the loss of the whole of Lincolnshire.

Food security is a valid concern, and yes our farmers should be growing more of our own food, but there is no need to mix this up with with a load of NetZero stupidity and eco alarmism.

edmond van ammers
edmond van ammers
28 days ago

One in four homes is going to flood by 2050. Really?

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago

Good point. The only way you can confidently make that kind of prediction is to use a crystal ball. Anyone who follows the rigors of science would scoff at a claim like that.

Geoff Mould
Geoff Mould
28 days ago

The NHS not a good example of what can be created in the UK in difficult times. We need to be far more adaptable and nimble in food production and distribution than a one size fits all monolith. Also dispute the throw away line that the Israelis used food supplies as a weapon in Gaza.

Chris Van Schoor
Chris Van Schoor
28 days ago

Oh dear. You lost me at “climate change”. How can I read the rest, knowing the author lacks the insight to realise that the whole climate/hot/scary/earth/warming/co2/man is bad thing is just a scam? Even scientists are now declaring that “the imagined and imaginary ‘climate emergency’ is at an end.” (A two-day climate conference in Prague, organised by the Czech division of the international Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel), which took place on November 12-13 in the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic in Prague).

Chris Van Schoor
Chris Van Schoor
28 days ago

Oh dear. You lost me at “climate change”. How can I read the rest, knowing the author lacks the insight to realise that the whole climate/hot/scary/earth/warming/co2/man is bad thing is just a scam? Even scientists are now declaring that “the imagined and imaginary ‘climate emergency’ is at an end.” (A two-day climate conference in Prague, organised by the Czech division of the international Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel), which took place on November 12-13 in the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic in Prague).

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
28 days ago

Hmm, thanks for the info – I looked that up. The 3 UK signatories to the declaration are –

Lord Monckton, an hereditary peer that sets mathematical puzzles and writes sudoku books;
Valentina Zharkova, a mathematician at The University of Northumbria;
James Croll, dead since 1892.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
28 days ago

Flooding increases in Britain because we have
Increased drainage due to government subsidies post 1939.Changed land use from woodland, wood pasture, rough land, park land to cultivated fields and vast warehouses, business and car parks. Built houses in flood plains which are not : built on platform above level of flooding, have wall to wall carpets, electrics at floor level rather than entering house from rooof and coming down walls, furniture which cannot be moved upstair, wooden floors not tile, stone or compacted rock with bees wax coating. The Abbey of Tewkesbury did not flood because it was built above the level of flooding.
Very few planners have degrees in civil engineering. Planners should have degrees in Civil Engineering with Grade B in Further Maths and a Masters in planning. Quality not quantity.

M Ruri
M Ruri
28 days ago

I stopped reading when the writer said that Climate Change is also driving more extreme weather. EVERY IPCC report ever written has stated there is no evidence around this. That is, the reports themselves have stated as much. Conversely, the executive summaries of such reports, (written by political activists and diplomats) and the only content ever consumed by reporters and their readers, express the opposite. In the AR-5 that came out in 2014, this dichotomy so bothered the head of the IPCC working group, that he wrote to the IPCC to suggest that the Executive Summary for Policy Makers be re-named the Executive Summary FROM Policy Makers. I would guess that the next ten years is going to see the world realize what a scam much of the Climate Change movement is.

Su Mac
Su Mac
28 days ago

The logic wobble at the beginning of this article is that millions did not NEED to be quarantined indoors during Covid.

If people could stop intentionally pissing off Putin that would immensely helpful too.

Despite those provisos, yes, local agriculture needs proper, in the round focus. How we can avhieve anything with 3 x cost of energy I am not sure…

Edward Seymour
Edward Seymour
28 days ago

James, Israel does not use the food supply to bring Hamas to heel. The plentiful food reaching Gaza is being hijacked by local mafia and Hamas. The newly opened crossing via the Philadelphi corridor should improve things since aid agencies previously halted their transits to protect their drivers, many of whom had been hurt by gangsters. Paradoxically the mountains of food available to Gazans can be seen on the black market run by the thugs.

Mark Splane
Mark Splane
28 days ago

“[O]ur remaining fruit and vegetable production is concentrated in low plain places, like Lincolnshire, that are projected to flood with rising sea levels in the next century.” As a yellowbelly myself, I laughed out loud at this. Such land has always been low lying and prone to flooding. Centuries ago our ancestors created the drainage to make it farmable. Flood plains make good arable land because of flooding: river water delivers nutrients to the soil. (Not so good for housing estates though)
The Netherlands is the world’s second largest food exporter – a quarter of the country is below sea level FFS! I struggle to understand the defeatism of the Climate Catastrophists: they seem convinced that problems our forebears were able to overcome hundreds of years ago, using only medieval technology, will somehow prove insuperable to us.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
28 days ago

8-10 years ago the British food “supply” used to be “6 meals from anarchy”. I’m pretty sure the most recent head of the NFU said it was down to 3 meals (not days)
In the 1960’s and early 70’s food was still relatively seasonal… we had to wait all year for the mandarin in the Christmas stocking etc. Now, traditional Christmas food is very ho hum as the same food is available all year round. The average man in the street has little or no understanding of where food comes from, how much effort is required to get it from soil/hot house to their plate, and is completely disconnected from nature. It will only be when there is a food shortage, and food is stolen from allotments and home gardens (and I can see that happening in the not too distant future) will the penny drop. Who wants to live on insects and totally GMO’d crops? Not me.
“Climate Change” is rubbish… you only have to check out 100yr+ photos of water levels at well known sites like the Statue of Liberty, Sydney harbour, Macau to see that the water level hasn’t changed. The real problem is geo-engineering which no government denies anymore.

Pete Marsh
Pete Marsh
27 days ago

And the ideological fanatics in Westminster address the issue by paying subsidies to take land out of production e.g. a 100 hectare solar ‘farm’ is being proposed near to me on prime arable land.
And allowing up to a million immigrants a year to move to the UK to ramp up demand.

Oliver Wright
Oliver Wright
27 days ago

Couldn’t the decrease in the average height of British five-year-olds be down to the fact that about a third of them are of non-British descent?

Dark Horse
Dark Horse
27 days ago

I manage on the state pension to eat healthily – it doesn’t have to be expensive – I microwave everything – have lots of tinned food as it keeps longer.
Breakfast: porridge made with semi-skimmed long life milk and organic oats plus fruit – grapes and sliced banana – or – scrambled egg – two large free range plus semi-skimmed long life milk – on wholemeal and rye toast with chopped tomatoes.
Lunch: Canned green lentils and canned chopped tomatoes with a dash of Lee & Perrins (peas or spinach can sub for lentils) add organic oats for bulk.
Supper: Tinned sardines in brine and tomato soup and oats flavoured with marmite followed by dates and a few squares of Montezuma chocolate for iron.
Snacks: Baked baby potatoes/dates/figs/clementines.
Canned and dried goods can last over a year.

Ex Nihilo
Ex Nihilo
26 days ago

I lost count of how many times the author used the phrase “we need to”. While there are many valid concerns expressed in the article, it omits the fundamental reality that the food production/distribution system we now have exists as an evolutionary process driven fundamentally by creating the maximum available food at the cheapest cost. During the pivotal 20th century the proportion of household expense devoted to feeding a family dropped stunningly as did the frequency and magnitude of famine.
While social activists frequently point to “hunger” and “poor nutrition” as massive problems, they are far from what was common in my early life in the 50’s and 60’s. Back then media frequently ran images from famines showing prostrate dying people with skeletal concentration camp bodies and the physical manifestations of the severest forms of chronic malnutrition, kwashiorkor and marasmus. Today, when the media shows us “hungry people”, they seldom actually appear obviously malnourished. I have even seen media images of obese people purported to be critically “hungry”. That is not to deny hunger as an worthy concern; however, it is orders of magnitude less endemic than 60 years ago.

Dismantling the current system may achieve some of the salutary effects the author promises, but may also reintroduce some of the systemic vulnerabilities that we have forgotten about. One of these is cost. Decentralizing the food supply system and undoing agribusiness models will translate into substantially higher cost to consumers and entail its own risks to availability. From an economic standpoint, the vicissitudes of nature (floods, drought, storms), while presenting some vulnerability to large agricultural businesses, these entities also have advantages against such adversity that small plot farmers do not. For one, an agribusiness with arable land holdings spread over wide geographic areas is less likely to lose all of its production in one event and would therefore survive economically. However, a small holder whose entire crop is lost to drought often incurs bankruptcy, does not have access to the kind of credit markets that sustain large corporations through downturns, and often permanently abandons agriculture as an occupation.

Regional fluctuations in production are dampened by the modern system of distribution that cannot be duplicated by locally-grown and marketed systems. If the supply chain is not prepositioned, one cannot easily overnight make the arrangements to get massive amounts of perishable foods from fields to aggregation centers through transport systems and then distribution centres and on to shops. Those kinds of rapid adjustments are only possible in a widely-interconnected computerized system. While that system was highly-stressed during Covid and its limitations exposed, it actually recovered far more rapidly than any food distribution system in human history. Although many woke to the consideration of “what if the shelves were empty” nobody starved and the shelves were soon refilled.

William Cameron
William Cameron
25 days ago

A water disaster is much closer. The water companies cannot deal with the population size and drinking water will run out in the next heat spell

Dan Bulla
Dan Bulla
24 days ago

Perhaps the English should visit Ireland. I’m American and paid my first visit there 2 years ago. Irish food was superb…among the best I’ve ever had and I traveled extensively. If I asked where the roast beef came from, they’d tell which farm just several km away. And the outstanding salmon; probably from which local North Sea fish boat.

Zorost Zorost
Zorost Zorost
18 days ago

“Climate change is also driving more extreme weather events globally that profoundly affect food supplies.”
No, it isn’t.
“The idea that we’d all be confined to our houses for months by a virus would have been considered science fiction prior to 2020, but now it’s a well understood scenario. Disaster planners have to model worse epidemics than Covid, and we need to be ready for them.”
Or you could plan to not let yourselves be tricked by tyrants into becoming your own jailers. No one I know stayed in their homes for covid; no one I know died of it.
“The report also raises concerns that a botched roll-out of new farm support schemes might de-motivate farmers and discourage their investment in future production.”
It likely wasn’t botched, but intentionally made to be unworkable. For 20 or so years Big Money interests have been betting that food would become expensive, and when Big Money bets on the future they make sure that future happens. Look up all the investments in farms and farmland the Elites have been making, including Bush Family Inc. buying up a few hundred thousand acres in the middle of South America. Nothing special about this semi-arid region… except it sits on top of the world’s largest untapped aquifer.
“We need lots more [stuff that would cost Big Money money, while decreasing the profits they’d make from what they’ve already invested in food insecurity].”
Good luck. Nothing will change as long as those in charge remain the same. And I don’t mean the fools running for election.
“The current fight between the government and farmers about inheritance tax is staggeringly stupid… We need to help them, not undermine them, so they can invest to create the healthy real food production we need.”
Again, it’s not stupid or a mistake. It’s in Big Money’s self-interest to drive small farmers out so they can monopolize food production. Advocacy or nagging or thinking and writing, none of this will help. The solutions are obvious, there is no need to state the obvious. There is a need to get to the point where we can actually implement those obvious solutions.
I recommend everyone see to their own food production, and don’t worry about the big picture as we have no control over that. Garden, make friends with farmers.

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
30 days ago

I’m not sure doomerism like this is helpful. If there is some kind of crisis, food is just one of many breakdowns that threaten the population. In a modern civilization, people are too dependent on too many interdependent systems – food, water, fuel, electricity etc. If everyone grows a garden, that won’t help out much during some catastrophe. If you’re really worried about food, you’re probably better off storing canned goods and freeze dried products.

The reference to climate change and diminishing food production is annoying because it is repeated ad nauseam and is not based in fact. There is no crop I can think of that has dropped in yield and productivity. All major crops have enjoyed continuous increased production.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
30 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

The graph at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/cereal-and-oilseed-rape-production/cereal-and-oilseed-production-in-the-united-kingdom-2024
suggests yields per area are flat over the last couple of decades (though more erratic in recent years).

The UK only produces about half its own food, so it is clearly vulnerable, hence rationing in WW2 and huge efforts made by Britain and its allies to keep us fed.

The point of ‘doomerism’ like this is to provoke thought. ‘Doomerism’ prior to WW2 meant Britain started to prepare for food supply from as early as 1936. https://thehistorypress.co.uk/article/the-road-to-rationing-preparing-to-feed-britain-in-world-war-ii/

A free market in food, and capitalism more generally, fails during wartime (internally, for the country at war).

Jim Veenbaas
Jim Veenbaas
30 days ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

I’m not sure what kind of war you think will happen. Britain is a nuclear power. If it gets into a full blown war, I think there are bigger concerns than food safety.

Looking at the charts, it looks like yields have been flat for 20 years. That makes Britain an extreme outlier. Thats an important question to answer.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
30 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

The article sketches a couple of ways this could happen to the UK (I expect Canada and the US are much more resilient). It doesn’t even need a war in the conventional sense, never mind a nuclear one.

Possibly Britain’s food production is already maxed out, having gone through a big boost post WW2.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

Even in Canada fresh fruits and vegetables are trucked in from the US & Mexico. The eat locally at best applies in the summer, sometimes not even then

Colin Haller
Colin Haller
28 days ago
Reply to  LindaMB

In Canada we may be forced to eat like the first three generations of my forebears who immigrated here (which is to say, poorly), but we won’t starve like those in the UK …

simon lamb
simon lamb
29 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

The kind of war Russia is fighting. Putin has understood what no-one else had – that you can fight a conventional war in which no side dares use the nuclear option – except him if all else fails of course.
There is also the covert war, where the flow of essential resources is undermined, not necessarily directly but through cyber attacks. I gather this has already started.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
29 days ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

Farmers were paid, What the government did was force farmers to cultivate all land. Cheap labour from the Women’s Land Army meant land which had become fallow or previously had been uneconomic to cultivate were brougth into production. Also the introduction of tractors and bulldozers greatly increased production. Widespeard drainage was possible because of tractors and bulldozers.

Citizen Diversity
Citizen Diversity
30 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

If there’s any sort of crisis, all those people with allotments, or growing veg in their gardens, as well as the small farmers, will have to be protected from raiders.

Julie Curwin
Julie Curwin
29 days ago

They will have to protect it themselves. That’s one of the reasons why Americans have the Second Amendment.

John Ramsden
John Ramsden
29 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

I skimmed over the climate change aspect of the article, but wasn’t the author’s main point not that more CO2 would stunt growth (In fact I would imagine the opposite is true) but that rising sea levels would flood low-lying land in places like Lincolnshire, as it would in Bangladesh, and thus reduce or at the least salt-sow, the area available for growth?

I would guess that many farms in the future will be giant multi-storey “ziggurat” like structures, sealed from the outside air and climate-controlled inside. Or perhaps a south-facing tear-drop shape, with a roof steep at the south and sloping more gradually toward the north, to maximise the amount of sunlight falling on the roof.

Norfolk Sceptic
Norfolk Sceptic
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

“One in four UK homes is projected to flood by 2050.”

More likely by visiting Engineers and Doctors than the sea!

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

The Netherlands have been holding off the sea for centuries to bring land into production, we could do the same.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
28 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

Is there anywhere in the UK “like Lincolnshire” ? The Somerset Levels, maybe, though that is more grazing than arable land, I’d imagine. The Fylde of Lancashire ?
I can’t think of anywhere else, but can you ?

Carlos Danger
Carlos Danger
28 days ago
Reply to  John Ramsden

Do the math and vertical farming doesn’t work.

Miriam Cotton
Miriam Cotton
29 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

It’s not ‘doomerism’ any more than taking our life insurance is.

Gordon Welford
Gordon Welford
29 days ago
Reply to  Jim Veenbaas

Agree.extra CO2 has made the planet greener over the last 20 years

Ken Ferguson
Ken Ferguson
30 days ago

Stopped reading when I heard Climate Change. Don’t be stupid…..

tintin lechien
tintin lechien
30 days ago
Reply to  Ken Ferguson

Applause! I commented the same above. Some writers still don’t get! Or they are brainwashed so deeply they don’t even know what they are talking about? Someone said it a while ago – climate change, net zero, trans ideology etc are just like religion(s). Once converted, there is no way out.

John Ellis
John Ellis
29 days ago
Reply to  tintin lechien

I’m curious. Do you not think the climate ever changes over time? Do you think it does, but not just right now? Or do you accept the climate is changing now, but that human activity is nothing (or almost nothing compared with nature) to do with it?
Depending on how you answer that, I will know what the basis for discussion might be.
Incidentally, personally I think the climate IS changing, has always been changing in one direction or another, and is probably accelerated since the 20th century (but not caused) by human activity. I deride Ed Miliband and his Net Zero religion, as well as those like Theresa May who laid the groundwork for him.

Karen Arnold
Karen Arnold
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ellis

I agree completely with your comment, I think it is arrogant (and stupid) to think people can control the climate.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
29 days ago
Reply to  Karen Arnold

So if there was a nuclear war you don’t believe there would be a nuclear winter?

Tom Condray
Tom Condray
29 days ago
Reply to  Dennis Roberts

The statistics on nuclear winter were calculated on the basis of nuclear weapons detonating very close to the Earth’s surface. As a result of those ground level explosions, large amounts of dust would enter the atmosphere, and–just like when a large volcano erupts–interfere with sunlight reaching the ground.
In fact, a major nuclear war would see hydrogen weapons exploding well above the Earth’s surface in order to create the most destruction. So, the foundation upon which the Nuclear Winter hypothesis is based turns out to be quite flawed.
There are far, far fewer nuclear weapons today than was the case forty years ago. And the total power of today’s weapons is much less due to their improved accuracy. Moreover, the vast majority of nuclear weapons purported to be held by Russia are dilapidated, with the heir to the former Soviet Union much too poor to pay the tens of billions of dollar equivalents for the materials and qualified technicians to keep them in service. Consequently, the risk of a civilization ending nuclear war is quite small. In fact, it’s hard to see where anyone living below the equator would see any serious environmental effects whatsoever. As for the Northern Hemisphere’s inhabitants, outside the major population centers one would expect the disruptions to supply chains sufficient to create disaster without consideration for such things as fallout.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  Tom Condray

An EMP `bomb’ would be much more effective with less fall out. Everything is so interconnected through computers that entire systems could be wiped out, banking, power grids, cell phone communications, transportation, ship navigation….. you could sit back and watch your enemies destroy themselves.
Anthony Furey, a Canadian columnist for the Toronto Sun, wrote a book called Pulse Attack back in 2016. It highlights the danger to North America.

Andrew F
Andrew F
29 days ago
Reply to  LindaMB

Great post.
EMP attack would really kill the West.
I have not read book you listed but the current book is “nuclear war” by Annie Jacobsen.
Not much new information about what is likely to happen but well written.
Unfortunately the sleave comes up with clearly moronic conclusion that we should rid ourselves of nukes.

Dennis Roberts
Dennis Roberts
28 days ago
Reply to  Tom Condray

Ok, but the point being made is that should we choose to detonate nuclear weapons at surface (perhaps in an attempt to destroy silos), we could affect the climate. So it’s not arrogant or stupid to think we can ‘control’ the climate.

Norfolk Sceptic
Norfolk Sceptic
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ellis

The Earth’s climate is forever changing, and our Sun has the biggest influence on it

However, many define Climate Change as being that caused by Human Industrialization, so confusion is the result.

LindaMB
LindaMB
29 days ago
Reply to  John Ellis

The ‘Black Death’ which severely reduced the population across Europe and returned previously farmed fields to fallow, followed on the heels of the Little Ice Age. The temperature dropped by as much as 2C/3.6F, which reduced the harvests causing famines. In England shortage of labour led (eventually) to an end of feudalism. The little Ice Age didn’t end until the 19th century, when, coincidentally the industrial revolution was in full swing.
We are, according to what I remember from school before climate crisis fever took over, currently in an inter-glacial period, so things should be heating up. This will trigger ice cap melts which will reduce the salt concentration in the oceans which will shift the ocean currents south which will lead to the north becoming colder, eventually to another ice age. The earth is a closed loop system. The UK & Europe freezing in the dark so Ed Miliband and his acolytes can mαsτεrβάτε to net zero emissions while China and India continue pump out CO2 makes no sense. Likewise importing millions of people to the UK makes no sense if we already have food insecurity. We need practical people in government, maybe engineers-that discipline doesn’t seem as corrupt by this current nonsense.

Charles Hedges
Charles Hedges
28 days ago
Reply to  LindaMB

The global warming agenda has provided much income for engineers namely , designing offshore windfarms, anti flooding measures, umpteen studies, electric cars etc.
What is needed are engineers who do not make money from the warming agenda and have financial independence.

Norfolk Sceptic
Norfolk Sceptic
29 days ago
Reply to  tintin lechien

Once converted, you are sterile.