X Close

Will black voters forgive the Democrats? They're tired of being told what to do

Oakland's longshoremen are turning to Trump. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Oakland's longshoremen are turning to Trump. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


November 26, 2024   7 mins

Oakland, California. 

Marquise S. sat in the driver’s seat of an old black Honda on Oakland’s Foothill Boulevard with white powder spread out over his knees. A slender young black woman sat in the passenger seat; a young black man with braids sat in the back. Marquise, a black man, looks like he’s in his early thirties. Rolling a piece of paper into a straw, he offered me a bump.

I declined, but he was willing to talk to me about the recent election anyway. “I voted for Trump,” he said, before I had the chance to ask.

Across the bay from San Francisco, Oakland is the African-American cultural capital of the West Coast. As the birthplace of the Black Panther Party, its politics are famously Left-wing. Kamala Harris was born here and claims it as her hometown. She even kicked off her 2020 presidential campaign in front of Oakland City Hall.

Yet from what I can tell, among black voters in Oakland, there’s never been an overwhelming sense of loyalty to Harris. I interviewed black Oakland residents both before and after she became the presidential nominee. Since she lost the election, I’ve interviewed several more. The lack of enthusiasm she inspires among black voters speaks to her weakness as a candidate. But more importantly, it indicates the long-growing disillusionment of black Americans with the Democratic Party, which was borne out in Donald Trump’s successful courtship of the working-class black vote during the election. In particular, Trump doubled his support from young black men.

“I don’t care about Kamala. Who’s Kamala? She’s just a woman,” a young woman in West Oakland named Sakai told me. She voted for Trump, and insisted that gas and grocery prices were already going down as a result of the election. “Life is going to go back to what it was before 2020 took place.”

Even the black Oakland residents I spoke to who had voted for Harris had done so without much enthusiasm. Dionne, a middle-aged black woman who works at an OB-GYN clinic in East Oakland, voted for Harris despite aligning more closely with Republican values — especially when it came to abortion. “I feel like [the Democrats are] leaning way in a direction that I’m not ready for,” she told me. When I asked her what issues she had in mind, she spoke of the Democrats allowing biological men to use the women’s restrooms, and how that could open the door for predators to go after kids.

But the most immediate factor driving black voters away from the Democrats is the one driving voters of all races away: immigration.

Michelle is a 60-year-old black woman who grew up in Harris’s neighbourhood in Berkeley before moving to Oakland at the age of eight. She’s deeply involved in local politics. And over the years, she has gone from being a lifelong Democrat to  a Trump supporter. “We’ve always had a messianic complex,” she said of black American voters and their loyalty to Democrats. “There were always figures who could dazzle us with bullshit.”

The final straw for Michelle was the Democrats’ “insane” policies on immigration. Democratic politicians “blatantly drop like 10 or 15,000 immigrants into a black neighborhood, blatantly giving them resources they don’t give us,” she said. The wave of new immigrants under Biden, she believes, is driving down working-class wages. Moreover, she said, “a lot of the young males are dangerous”. She knows older immigrants who have been in Oakland for decades who feel the same way about the new arrivals.

Marquise felt a similar way. When I asked him why he doesn’t support the Democrats, he replied: “To tell the truth: immigrants.” “There’s too many in California.” He said that there are no jobs available. The woman in the passenger seat agreed, describing overcrowded classrooms filled with immigrant children who weren’t required to be immunised. She complained about teachers “speaking Mexican” in class.

When I asked Marquise what he liked about Trump, he replied that the President-elect would “get rid of all the Mexicans”. He also believed that Trump would let a lot of people out of prison. “He’s an asshole, but not that bad,” he explained.

There’s another, more subtle factor eroding loyalty to the Democrats: the party’s failure to improve economic conditions for working-class black Americans. The Democratic Party’s long history is littered with broken promises to black voters. The disappointments span the decades, from Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society to Barack Obama’s promise of Hope.

Michelle’s older brother, Cardell Watkins, doesn’t particularly like Trump. But when he heard Trump speaking in 2016 about how bleak conditions were for black Americans under Democratic governance, his ears pricked up. “You’re living in poverty,” Trump riffed. “Your schools are no good. You have no jobs. Fifty-eight percent of your youth is unemployed.” The speech touched a nerve.

Watkins, 62, has been a longshoreman for two decades. He currently works at the Port of Oakland. We, longshoremen, he said, “work ourselves to death”. The average longshoreman retires at about 70 years old, he said, and only lives to the age of 73 or 74. His granddaughter is a longshoreman, too. He’s constantly telling her to get out and go to school.

That said, as a union worker, Watkins has done well for himself. He’s been making about $150,000 a year for the better part of the last decade, with only a high-school diploma. He moved out of Oakland and now lives in Fairfield, a Bay Area suburb. “I’m around white people,” he told me. “I’ve never been so happy in my life. The front yards are clean, there’s no constant blaring of sirens.”

“I don’t want my grandchildren growing up in Oakland,” he said. “All the trash on the street, all the undocumented people coming in, all the lies.” He said he understands “white flight” now.

Watkins believes that local politicians, who are almost entirely Democrats, “have failed us”. “The Nancy Pelosis. Do you know how wealthy they are now?” The Democrats inherited San Francisco and Oakland, two cities with thriving maritime industries, he said, and “[ran] them into the ground”.

“They’re not interested in changing, in making America better. They’re interested in power and influence. They can live on Martha’s Vineyard, they can move to Switzerland, where there’s no crime or dirt in the streets. Once you become infinitely wealthy, the whole world is your neighbourhood.”

“I don’t want my grandchildren growing up in Oakland.”

When he was a kid, Watkins was raised to believe in Democratic leaders such as Jesse Jackson, Ralph Abernathy, and Andrew Young, who had marched with Dr. Martin Luther King. “They were able to tell us who to endorse and support,” he said. “We were in lockstep.”

But over the years, he saw those leaders betray ordinary black Americans, putting their careers before their constituents. “Once they got what they wanted from us, they didn’t have our best interests at heart,” he said. “We were being used.” His sister, Michelle, agrees.

When Obama first came on the scene, the siblings were exuberant. Michelle described Obama’s speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention as “magic”. But by the end of his presidency, they felt used all over again. By then, “[Obama] didn’t even really believe the shit he was saying no more,” said Michelle.

Michelle recalls the moment she lost faith in the Obama project. It was during the Great Recession, when Michelle was doing loan modifications for a bank called World Savings, trying to help homeowners avoid foreclosure. At the time, Senator Elizabeth Warren favoured a policy called “cramdown”, which would have allowed bankruptcy judges to reduce people’s mortgage debts to bring them into line with the reduced values of their homes. “This was going to be a lifeline,” Michelle said. “It could have saved so many people.” She believes that Obama killed it, helping the banks facilitate what she described as “the greatest transfer of black wealth in the history of the country”.

These days she sees Obama as just another condescending politician. “He’s made a cottage industry of always talking down to black people.” “He’s uplifting for every other race. But always kind of negative toward black people.”

This year, both Michelle and her brother thought Kamala Harris was just more of the same. “She doesn’t care about black people,” Watkins told me. “She just wants to be president — another Rolex in her jewellery box.”

Such scepticism was widespread among the voters I spoke to, but it was especially pronounced among the younger ones. Watkins and Michelle’s generation was raised in the shadow of the Civil Rights Movement. Its heroes became elected leaders who basked in history’s heroic glow as they operated the levers of the Democratic machine. Yet the lives of younger black Americans today have been shaped by what that movement failed to reverse: enduring, racialised poverty; urban blight; and endemic violence.

Michelle’s support for Trump has made her somewhat of a pariah among African Americans of her generation. But she believes that among younger black people the partisan loyalty that was so deeply ingrained in her is entirely absent. “The Democratic Party has lost the young black generation,” she told me. “They’re gone. And that’s in liberal Oakland. They want no part of it.”

Marquise’s views confirm her suspicions. “She full of shit,” Marquise said of Harris. When Harris kicked off her campaign, her team seemed to assume that young voters would flock to her. When Charli XCX tweeted that Harris was “brat”, her campaign revelled in the approval, rebranding her online presence to match the pop artist’s album cover.

But on the topic of Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion performing alongside Kamala during her campaign, Marquise said “It’s hella ghetto. Unprofessional.” He marvelled that Kamala Harris would put someone like Cardi B on stage with her while Trump was campaigning with Elon Musk.

The only reason the Democrats selected Harris, Marquise believes, was because she was a “minority”. But for black voters like him, appeals to identity politics are no longer enough to ensure their loyalty. Instead, they want to see real change — Michelle pointed to things like student reading scores, poverty, and crime. She said that the Democrats’ appeal to black voters was always “emotional, never practical”. She was tired of the “paternalistic attitude the party has taken toward black people”.

Nowadays, Watkins said that the workers at the union hiring hall, who are mostly black and Latino, are “flying their colours” for Donald Trump. Like him, they’re tired of being told what to think and who to vote for.

“I don’t have anything against her or anyone else,” Watkins said of Kamala Harris. “Just don’t tell me I have to support her, or that Trump’s been associated with white supremacy so I can’t vote for him. I’m tired of the bullshit. If it takes a white supremacist to get things done, so be it.”


Leighton Woodhouse is a journalist and documentary filmmaker based in Oakland, California.

lwoodhouse

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

27 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steven Carr
Steven Carr
15 days ago

‘Marquise felt a similar way. When I asked him why he doesn’t support the Democrats, he replied: “To tell the truth: immigrants.” “There’s too many in California.” He said that there are no jobs available.’

How the Democrats mocked and mocked Trump for talking about how immigrants were taking Black jobs. It was the stupidest thing they had ever heard.

Samuel Ross
Samuel Ross
15 days ago

A very nice article, indeed. It’s always a pleasure to see people freed from rigid patterns of thought and habit, that have held them in close bonds for a long time. First, consider. Then, consult with the knowledgeable. And lastly, act. Let this be your pattern of doing, and you will do well.

RR RR
RR RR
15 days ago

When you gas, food and lodgings cost too much compared to your income then no amount of white upper middle class wokery luxury beliefs is gonna help you. Quite the opposite.
Open borders, open drug dealing, college students triggering and male sex offenders in women’s jails. For example.

0 0
0 0
14 days ago
Reply to  RR RR

Ya think?

Rory Hoipkemier
Rory Hoipkemier
14 days ago

Excellent article worthy of UnHerd. It would be nice if some thinking Democrats read it, but not likely.

Jonathan Andrews
Jonathan Andrews
14 days ago

It seems like journalism. You know, going round, talking to people and telling us what they’ve said.

Kyle DeLoache
Kyle DeLoache
12 days ago

Well, I used to be a Democrat (until Oct. 7, 2023). But most of my friends are Democrats, so I’ll send this article to some of them. Maybe they will actually read it.

Thomas Wagner
Thomas Wagner
10 days ago

Thinking Democrat? An oxymoron, sir.

Cecil Skell
Cecil Skell
14 days ago

Black Americans are going from woke to woken up.

Alex Lekas
Alex Lekas
14 days ago

It did not take a trip to Oakland to learn that immigration is a big deal. Virtually all voters had it among their top issues, right along with the economy. And, of course, lower-skilled black people would mostly be hurt by it. That’s not new; it just took being personally imacted on a broad level to figure it out.
The lack of enthusiasm she inspires among black voters speaks to her weakness as a candidate. —–> maybe there is this factor, too: simply trotting out a candidate who is partly black and expecting every single black American to vote for that candidate as if all blacks are part of some urban Borg is demeaning and dehumanizing. It sees groups as nothing but group members rather than as individuals. Black people no more all think alike than whites do, but Dems never consider that. They’re so busy with their leftist white savior complexes that anyone outside of their bubble can only prosper if they direct the path.

Hugh Bryant
Hugh Bryant
14 days ago

It’s encouraging to see that fewer and fewer people are taken in by performative politics and are at last beginning to demand that politicians fix the plumbing first before poncing around promising to save the world like Starmer at COP.

Gordon Arta
Gordon Arta
14 days ago

Don’t forget that Oakland’s mayor, Sheng Thao, and the county DA, Pamela Price, both hard Left Democrats, voted in on a wave of ‘progressivism’ only a couple of years ago, have just been ousted in recalls because their policies unleashed a massive crime wave. The same has been happening in Democrat controlled states and cities across the US. Harris didn’t lose because she was a woman, had only a few months to mount a campaign, and all the other excuses. She lost because the real world effects of fantasy world progressive policies are coming home to roost.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
14 days ago

Finally, Black Americans are starting to see the light and think for themselves.

Paul Thompson
Paul Thompson
14 days ago

Really eye-opening.
One of Trump’s first actions when Harris became the Dem nominee was to get on black events and say that Harris was not black. I thought he was nuts. What’s the point? Well, now we see – the point was to cut the link between Harris and black voters. I have no idea if these comments worked, but she certainly lost some black voters, like the ones here.
The other issue, just as noted in this article, is that black voters are realizing that the Dem open-borders campaign is a threat to them. Unlimited numbers of illegals scum means that jobs at the bottom are taken by the scum.

mike flynn
mike flynn
14 days ago

The danger in USA, for all citizens, is expecting too much from elected high officials, and blob bureaucracy. Of any skin tone. Of any party. What we must demand is end to suffocating top down governance. Let the people take personal responsibility for their lives and families. Trump at least appears to believes this idea. We cannot expect him yo to GIVE it to us. Read the Declarationn and Constitution. Take back your country and life. Expect no one else to hand it to you.

Jonathan Andrews
Jonathan Andrews
14 days ago
Reply to  mike flynn

Do you best to look after yourself short of harming others

Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden
14 days ago

Entertaining and revealing piece if somewhat sad. And it strikes me how much more articulate Americans are than Britons.
You would never get such piercing observations from middle-class Britons interviewed by the BBC (they just wouldn’t approach anyone scarily working class). They would merely mumble something polite but innocuous that they’d doubtlessly already heard on the BBC.

James S.
James S.
14 days ago
Reply to  Tyler Durden

That’s amusing, considering how much the American chattering class thinks that just having a British accent means you must be more intelligent. Perhaps us Yanks just have less of a filter, especially nowadays towards elites and our rulers. As my Dad would have said, “We call a spade a dirty shovel.”

rchrd 3007
rchrd 3007
14 days ago
Reply to  Tyler Durden

To be fair Justin Webb (BBC journalist and ex N. America correspondent) has been known to write well on this topic. Not many like him at the BBC though.

Jonathan Andrews
Jonathan Andrews
14 days ago
Reply to  rchrd 3007

Isn’t this tragic? After many decades of the BBC trying to find journalists with intelligence and a desire to find out what is true, we have come to a place with one decent journalist.

Jon Barrow
Jon Barrow
14 days ago
Reply to  Tyler Durden

Don’t agree, the BBC (for example), perhaps we should say the Gatekeeper Class, only approaches a certain type of middle class person then only broadcasts views within certain ‘acceptable’ parameters.

Peter V
Peter V
14 days ago

Its pretty much spot on. It also speaks to what Bob Geldoff says when he hears criticism about Band Aid. He calls what British people, even from minority groups, say as “abstract wealthy-world arguments” and while a lot on here might not like him, what he stands for generally, etc I think he really epitomises whats going on perfectly.
Whether you’re in a war torn part of the third world or living in a deprived part of the first world, luxury social politics isn’t going to keep you safe, get you a job or keep you fed. You can’t literally aspire your way out of hunger, poverty and violence which is what the likes of Fuse ODG insinuates you can when he knocks Band Aid. You can say much the same thing about Osama and the “audacity of hope”.

Kathleen Smith
Kathleen Smith
14 days ago

One sentence was very telling to me: Michelle “blatantly drop like 10 or 15,000 immigrants into a black neighborhood, blatantly giving them resources they don’t give us,” Why are we treating those who are in this country illegally better than we treat our own citizens? Citizens should always be treated better than those who are not citizens.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
12 days ago

Harris’s mother is Indian, and her father is Jamaican, not a culturally black American. She went to a private high school in Canada. She changes her accent for different audiences. She is a pretender. Black voters picked up on her chicanery. The Democrats mistakenly think black people are too incompetent to get a driver’s license for voter identification, so they thought they could fool black voters into believing Harris was someone they could identify with … someone who was on their side.
When Harris was running for the presidential nomination in 2019, she did not receive a single delegate. Most black voters supported Biden. Most women supported Biden. The Democrats had all the data they needed to know Harris was a weak candidate. The Left was delusional, and most of them don’t appear to have a clue about why they lost.
— K. DeLoache

Last edited 12 days ago by UnHerd Reader
Steve Jolly
Steve Jolly
14 days ago

Great article. Democratic leaders should be forced to read articles like this over and over and over until they understand the peril their party faces. The Democrats cannot win elections without voters like those interviewed by this author. There is already near zero support for the Democrats and the ruling elites that back them in rural America. If the Democrats lose the inner cities, it’s well and truly over. They’ll be down to the ruling class and the class of managers, lawyers, bankers, etc. that feed off the excesses of the ruling class, the people Marx once called the petty bourgeoisie. That was a dangerous dynamic when Marx wrote it and it’s a dangerous dynamic now. It’s a recipe for revolution of one kind or another. Fortunately, and largely thanks to the system of divided powers and checks and balances left us by the founding fathers, America has the political structure to have these revolutions peacefully in most cases (with one big exception, obviously). We’ve had them before, with Teddy Roosevelt, with FDR, with Andrew Jackson, all men of the people despised and opposed by elite interests. Each took the country in new directions that the elites didn’t want to go and moved the country forward without a need for revolution.

Democrats should pay heed to the warnings found in this article. The country is changing and not in their favor. The trends are running against them. Not enough Democrat politicians and leaders understand the danger of their current position. They risk becoming a political afterthought for generations, like the Republicans after FDR. From 1935-1997, the Republicans controlled the House of Representatives for a total of four years, and the Senate for just eight. This didn’t change until the 90’s and the timing is no coincidence. Nixon’s southern strategy, conceived in the late 60s, was finally beginning to bear fruit with conservative rural districts finally reaching the tipping point to go Republican. Bill Clinton was a sharp enough politician that he recognized that and countered by moving the party toward the center away from its traditional base of working class voters, union workers, farmers, miners, etc. to court suburban voters and be on better terms with big business. That’s also when the Democrats started relying on racial and identity politics. In the short term, it worked and kept the Democrats competitive during a time that probably would have seen more Republican majorities, but it left a lot of people politically homeless whether they realized it or not. It takes a long time for the true implications of political decisions to be fully known. We didn’t know it at the time, and for several decades after, but now, with the benefit of hindsight, we can see the brightly lit path that led us directly from Clinton’s pivot to the rise of Donald Trump. The evidence is in the words of these very voters.

Will the Democrats be able to reverse these trends? Maybe and maybe not. If they start listening to people like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders rather than sabotaging and sidelining them, if they back away from their weird obsession with supporting transgenderism, if they drop the smug intellectual attitude, and if they get on the right side of the immigration debate, they certainly have a chance. Trump is bound to screw some things up in ways we can’t even guess at this point. He isn’t FDR. There will be openings to exploit, but not if their hands are tied by the multinational aristocrats and big money donors. Trump won in 2016 with almost no support from big business. In 2024, he gained the support of a few maverick entrepreneurs but the large majority of multinational corporations, banks, and the super wealthy were still against him. The Democrats have to understand that they can’t be the party of aristocrats and they can’t be seen to be the party of aristocrats. It doesn’t matter how many ads they can buy, how many superPACs they fund, or how much money they can put on the table, it can’t overcome the grassroots anger that the people have towards them. Just by supporting one side, they’re effectively helping the other. They are a net negative to whichever side they are on and there’s absolutely nothing they can do about it. The Democrats will have enough difficultly righting the ship without dragging the massive anchor that the aristocrats represent in today’s America. I’d personally love to see a real choice again between two parties with different ideas about how to improve the country and protect the interests of the people. I’d love to see a scenario where the likes of Soros and the Koch brothers are both locked out of political influence, retired to Switzerland, and whining to each other about how the deplorables ruined everything. I’m not optimistic this will happen.

Last edited 14 days ago by Steve Jolly
Daniel Lee
Daniel Lee
10 days ago

“He said he understands “white flight” now.”
The term has never been anything but a bit of empty rhyming doggerel concealing the fact that people of EVERY color flee criminality and urban decay just as soon as they can afford to do so.

UnHerd Reader
UnHerd Reader
9 days ago

In 2024 16% of black voters voted for Trump and 83% for the democrat. That is an improvement over 2020 when 92% of blacks voted democrat.