Marseille is making headlines — as usual for the wrong reasons. Back in October, two teenagers were caught up in the deadly gang wars that have long plagued France’s second largest city. The first, aged 14, was arrested for killing a minicab driver who’d refused to take him to the spot where he’d plan to shoot someone. The second, just a year older, was stabbed to death in a poor neighbourhood of the city’s infamous Quartiers Nord. Just to be sure, his assassins then burned the child’s corpse.
Especially given the extreme youth of both boys, and the fact that both ended up dead after being hired to commit murder by an infamous drug dealer, himself in jail, local journalists were quick to characterise the deaths as a tragic novelty. All the same, the newness of these recent killings shouldn’t be overstated. More than a century ago, after all, stories of teenagers butchering each other were front-page stories here almost daily. And then, as now, reporters wondered what caused so much chaos at such a tender age. In 1916, for instance, Le Petit Provençal newspaper characterised the Ace of Clubs gang as a “bunch of young brats” and speculated that they were driven to violence by copying what they read in the newspaper.
These days, members of the DZ Mafia or the Yoda Gang, the two main groups that paint Marseille red, can access their entertainment at a swipe. Yet from their ruthless violence to their international spread, sepia-tinged groups like the Ace of Clubs have nonetheless bequeathed much to their modern successors. More than that, they became inspirations and the names of the gangsters of old are still familiar to the current generation, who like their predecessors often use criminality as a way to climb a social ladder that is otherwise denied to them.
And, perhaps most of all, the continued resilience of criminality in this city by the sea speaks to the utter inability to smash the scourge of poverty — one that ensures there’s always a willing supply of desperate young men willing to kill, or die, for the chance at a better tomorrow.
Organised crime in Marseille has a long history. Things began at the end of the 19th century, when the city acted as the gateway to France’s colonial empire. In need of cheap labour, the port attracted immigrants from southern Italy and Corsica. The first criminal gangs quickly appeared, when pimps operating in the so-called Reserved Quarter, then one of the largest red light districts in Europe, chose to join forces. Their first ringleader was a former Corsican sailor named François Albertini. Nicknamed François the Madman, he led the Gang of 21, running prostitutes in the Reserved Quarter and getting into fights with other clans.
These disputes soon turned deadly. In 1907, in an echo of today’s killings, Albertini ordered a 16-year-old pimp to murder several rivals. André Anfriani, the teenage assassin, shot three people before being arrested, tried and guillotined. By 1911, Albertini had been detained too, and sentenced to spend life in a penal colony in French Guyana. In the end, the Madman escaped and disappeared, but nonetheless succeeded in planting the seeds of Marseille’s later crime scene. The routes the Gang of 21 used to evade justice — Spain, Portugal and Morocco, or else straight to the US — would soon be employed to transfer prostitutes to brothels in Africa and South America. Over the decades to come, drugs would flow the same way.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeI spent three days in Marseille in October. It was awful. Within two blocks of my hotel were junked cars without tires or windows, street littered with all sorts of detritus (much of it distinctly unsavory), and streets ripe with the odor of urine. Also within two blocks of my hotel I witnessed an assault of two men upon a third and open public urination, at ten in the morning, against the wall our the hotel. The hotel itself required the use of a room key to enter the building after dusk and to use the elevator at all times. Further, an armed security guard with a list of names checked the identities of all arrivals after dusk. The desk clerk assured me this was meant to reassure me as to my physical safety, but actually had the opposite effect. The part of the city I visited, within walking distance of its most popular tourist sites, truly felt like a failed society.
It also helped me viscerally understand the rise of the right wing parties in France. Were I a French voter who had my experience I would have definitely walked away enraged by what I saw and questioning why my country should put up with it.
Sweden has this problem as well, and the youths here are not ‘taking to crime’ because of poverty or lack of job training, etc. They simply like being gangsters. Now, maybe we would have _more_ gangsters if we didn’t have these training and social welfare programs. Not an experiment anybody here wants to run! I think this level of social protection and spreading of opportunity is great for everybody, most especially those who would never take to crime even if they did not exist — so I am all for creating such programs in other countries. But if the rationale is ‘will reduce crime’ then you risk a backlash if you discover that the criminals care more about the social aspects of being a criminal than the cash benefit. And around here, at any rate, that seems to be the case.
Yes, that has always been a distinctly daft explanation, and an entree to the usual whining.
Being a gangster is glamorous, fast moving, and comes with attendant drugs and sex. Until you get killed, maimed or someone close to you has that happen to them . . . and you find you’re not so much of a psychopath that you don’t feel responsible for it.
Maybe it’s a quibble, but two boys who have hired themselves out as killers haven’t really been “caught up” in drug violence, as though they were innocently walking to visit their grandmothers when they were killed. They’re willing participants.
Mass incarceration, strong borders, hard labour….are the only way you might get a handle on gang violence.
Criminality thrives amongst people disposed to criminality
Yes, criminals are and always were ubiquitous: which is why we are all laden with keys, PINs, passwords, alarms, IDs and using cameras recognising face, iris and fingerprints.
Do the police know the names of the drug dealers? With the death penalty in place, a crackdown would eliminate all of them. In Singapore, they get the benefit of a trial and a sure death. That is the ONLY way, whatever the goody-goodies object to.
A foretaste of what is happening in British cities, the poverty of the north adding a distinctly provincial character.
Just to give some balance. I have twice been to Marselle in the past 5 years. Once staying in a travel hostel and secondly in a hotel next to the train station. Both times I walked around various parts of the main port city and enjoyed food and drink at a very popular locals raised square area. Despite the mix of ethnicity I didn’t experience any issues and just took basic precautions like any large city.
I would recommend either as a short break or stay before onward travel.
I think legalising maybe part of the answer as well as smarter criminal strategies.
I would support this. I go to Marseille a bit and often sail on to Corsica. It is a rough and edgy city – I explain it to those who have not been as being kinda like as if you moved all the inhabitants of Tottenham to Brighton !! – but I find Marseille welcoming and manage to have a lot of fun there.
What would happen if these drug were made legal?
The criminality would cease. The control and supply would become another standard market mechanism. Those who need drugs to “get by” and “get through” – as with alcohol – would no longer be subject to criminal gangs. Those who don’t need drugs will continue not doing, and yet will be freed from the criminality that forces people into an underworld of violence, robbery and death. The police would be freed from pursuit of a whole wedge of expensive investigations. Prisons would no longer be overcrowded and run from within by those who control the supply of drugs, and incriminate prison officers into the bargain.
Downsides? The handwringing moralisers would be out in force, telling us how awful drugs are.
I know which i’d prefer.
Yes, I agree. It’s hard to imagine that those who’ve had no interest in drugs up to now would suddenly start taking them. Even if some did the cessation of drug crime and it’s tentacles would far outweigh the damage.
They may not ‘suddenly’ start taking them, but the evidence of China during the era of British opium importation was that eventually many do, due to social upheavals, war, sickness and so on.
And then it’s not long before you have a major problem.
Not in my experience in Canada. Legalization has normalized massively expanded use. Teens are comatose – and there are mental health/homeles drug tent cities springing up in every city…Peterborough now unrecognizable. Kitchener, Guelph…lots of medium size cities….all dominated by this stuff now. And drug shops at every intersection. Decriminalization maybe….but what Trudeau has done is just criminal and catastrophic
Are you attributing all this to legalised marijuana?
No. A lot of the problems come from trying to treat addiction to hard drugs as a medical issue, something you can treat with enough time and care. Then the state focuses on keeping addicts from OD’ing while giving them free drugs, which are safer to take than buying adulterated who-knows-what on the street – that’s what “treatment” amounts to, basically just keeping addicts alive. And this is what the federal government’s been working toward for the past five years or so.
They’re hampered because they’re intruding in provincial jurisdiction, but they keep offering funding and programs. It doesn’t work and one of the main reasons is the free drugs they hand out are being collected by gangs and then sold all over the place. You can imagine the consequences of that.
In places where marijuana was made legal, the expectation was that non-criminal distribution networks and suppliers would put the criminals out of business. Sounded great in theory. In practice, it hasn’t worked out that way so far, as many users still prefer the non-approved marijuana. see for instance: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/cannabis-5-year-1.6989993 — but is 5 years enough time? Buried in that note is the figure that 1/3rd of Canadians are still using non-approved sources.
the expectation was that non-criminal distribution networks and suppliers would put the criminals out of business. Sounded great in theory. In practice, it hasn’t worked out that way
You did read the reference, right?
“ … the CMAJ … paper notes the important social justice benefits from substantial reductions in criminal arrestsand charges, along with the associated stigma.”
many users still prefer the non-approved marijuana.
In fact “many users” amounts to one third,
“Two-thirds of active cannabis users now get their cannabis from legal sources, according to the paper.”
And what is meant by “non-approved”? It could be a friends backyard. So not really an indictment of a social experiment after all.
It’s mostly black market drugs that are cheaper than in stores where there is high taxation. The drug dealers are doing very well still.
Then the government should stop the high taxation. The point of drugs being legal is that it removes the incentive of gangs profiting from drugs being illegal. If there’s no profit there’s no interest. If there’s no interest there’s no crime.
I can’t see that ‘approved sources’ is remotely feasible in a country the size of Canada, particularly given its low population, and the fact that marijuana grows about anywhere.
I know a lot of Canada is freezing . . . but quite a lot of the habitable part of Canada actually has mild weather much of the year. And that’s still quite a massive area.
How would legalising drugs work? Would anyone over 18 be able to go into a shop and buy them like one can buy alcohol and fags?
I don’t know. My point is really about the amount of damage done to communities through illegal drugs and crime.
A new set of problems would arise. There are always tradeoffs. It’s not like legal booze is without its issues.
What new set of problems do you imagine?
At least crimes born out of poverty are logical, they are predictable.
Australia’s most dangerous criminals have always been police officers, who are not motivated by poverty, but a sadistic pervert appetite to commit crimes they know, correctly, they will never be punished for. It is important to mention that Australia’s criminal police officers have been committing bizarre crimes, they often use vastly disproportionate means to achieve trivial, even nonsensical outcomes to discredit crime witnesses & victims. Discredited crime witnesses/victims aren’t just worthless, they make criminal police officers look like pillars of virtue deserving of protection, even praise. Criminal police evidently learnt from the gruesome murder of Sallie-Anne Huckstepp. This is likely why I am still alive.
As my story as an involuntary crime-tech-demo-dummy since 2009 shows in a leafy suburb of Melbourne, Australia, where I have owned my home since 2001, the lure of risk-free criminality has extended to government insiders beyond police officers, as well as to military personnel over the past decades. Opportunity makes thieves everywhere.
Sadistic government/military insiders live out their villain fantasies using resources their clients’ victims’ taxes are paying for, e.g. DARPA’s trans-cranial direct-current stimulus (electric shocks to the brain delivered remotely, through walls) variants used to keep crime witnesses who cannot be tricked, bribed or coerced with physical violence chronically sleep deprived for months on end.
I have had more than a dozen of these shocks delivered to my brain, other parts of my body in most 24hr time periods since early April 2024. They are not limited to night time. If I try to have a nap during the day, they intensify, whoever is administering them takes evident pleasure demonstrating their virtuosity delivering e.g. electric shocks remotely: the shocks are delivered at the cusp of falling asleep, once I experienced my two middle fingers involuntarily extending. When the electric shocks are directed at muscles, not to the brain, muscles contract involuntarily. I experienced involuntary shrug of my shoulders recently.
I had to learn over the past month that electric shocks, sound and voice-to-skull incidents at least can be delivered to crime witnesses’ bodies many kilometres away from home, while not carrying anything electronic beyond a credit card. I was standing next to my car in two different public car parks when I was subjected to these demos on two different occasions. My car’s engine was turned off both times. I never consented to my body to be microchipped – if it is microchipped. I woke up once to the stalker ex-coworker standing next to my bed years ago though. I never even dated the stalker. I installed barrel locks after that.
Tech capabilities to induce symptoms of serious illnesses, e.g. heart-disease have been in Australia’s organised crime arsenals likely long before 2019. I experienced this twice overnight – writing this on 28-11-24, causing sudden, drastic arrhythmia, followed by very high pulse rate. I am so outraged & horrified by what I am forced to learn about Australia’s absurd crime reality, I lost the ability to fear anything, beyond my inability to communicate the risks Australia’s lawlessness poses to everyone across the globe. Everyone, because the tech likely travels via the Internet & the Internet is everywhere.
When in 2019 I declared self-representation as Victoria Police admitted, they were forcing me to fight at court as an accused criminal to silence me, I started experiencing remotely induced, debilitating physical harm always in my home until 2022, usually at night & often just before court hearings. I am isolated in the home I have owned since 2001 in a leafy suburb, because I lost my ability to earn a salary in 2017 to the stalker ex-coworker’s crimes & to protect others from the inevitable spill-overs of crimes against me. Recently experienced involuntary shoulder shrugs, involuntary rude gestures make me even more likely to be isolated in my home, interacting with people only, who have known me long before these incidents started.
I never even dated the stalker, I never mixed with any MARCUCCI or other criminals.
The stalker is likely an info source for the MARCUCCI crime gang featuring criminal police officers, military/Australian Signals Directorate/etc. insiders, aiding the Mafia, other crime gangs, showing off their gluttony of sick psycho crimes because they can.
Dozens of MARCUCCI participate in crime frenzies.
I lost count after 50 bikers on one occasions. They sometimes do concerted sound blasts as they turn up en-masse at predictable points as I do my last remaining routine outside of my home: going to gym classes. The MARCUCCI act like children in Lord Of The Flies. Their sadistic perversion born out of risk-free criminality is truly terrifying to reconcile with the fact: they are highly paid professionals in Australia’s government/military. Women participate in MARCUCCI crimes, as evidenced by female voices delivering voice-to-skull gleefully, female shapes on HUGE, LOUD motorbikes.
I exhausted all legal avenues to at least have some of the MARCUCCI’s crimes on official Australian records & failed. None of their thousands of crimes just against me show up in any statistics, let alone receive any punishment. The MARCUCCI have dozens of members. I was only 1 of 7 of the stalker’s concurrent targets just from the Victorian Electoral Commission 2009-2012. You do the maths/conclusions about Australia’s fabulous crime statistics.
The stalker had (still has?) unrestricted access to everyone’s up-to-date whereabouts via frequently synchronised/updated government records since about 2007. Everyone in our state at least, likely the whole of Australia. Everyone includes all women, people in witness protection, every child a paedophile fancies. Since Australia is part of Five Eyes, AUKUS, the Quad, etc., military technology capabilities from Australia’s partners are likely to be also in organised crime arsenals – alongside crime tech traded with criminals across the globe. Becoming a silent elector only protects people’s data from debt collectors.
I have been forced to endure hundreds of remotely induced physical harm/sleep deprivation incidents of a wide range since 2019. In 2019 a MARCUCCI warned me: what I am forced to experience is cancer-causing. His warning only made sense in 2024. It took me almost 5 years to succumb to this level of sadistic pervert criminality. If I indeed have cancer, it is evidently not aggressive enough to kill grown-ups in 5 years. There is no honour amongst thieves though, so no doubt what I am forced to endure is dished out to the loved ones, including small children of other crime witnesses, who cannot be tricked, bribed or coerced into aiding crime, even if they themselves are subjected to remotely induced physical harm.
Using military-grade weapons against non-combatant civilians is a warcrime.
My last, forced warcrime incident in my home in leafy Melbourne, behind locked doors, on my own, happed today, 28-11-24, at around 7am. I am writing this at 1:16pm. I checked the time after I received the 2nd electric shock (DARPA) last night. It was 4:31am. I took a 2nd double dose of sleeping pills to be able to get some sleep in between the shocks. I have had to experiment with sleeping pills & ear-plugs that stay in place without unbearable irritation even after 100+ nights. Life goes on. All contorted & crippled, but goes on anyway. I am too outraged to commit suicide.
Since April this year, the volume of the electric shocks/other remotely induced physical harm incidents jumped sharply. It may be, because Australia’s Defense Force finally started investigating organised crime infiltration. Look for “Operation Decibel”. I choose to believe that my desperate public interest disclosures like this one contributed to the investigation. Australia’s law-enforcement lack the skill/experience to investigate crimes though, having missed out on decades of incremental learning about technology used in crimes, as I was forced to learn 2009-2018, while I still tried to report crimes I witnessed as a public servant, crimes I continue being forced to live with. Crime reporting is routinely blocked in Australia. Clare O’Neil’s grotesque cluelessness about technology, as she embarrassed Australia on the world stage repeatedly is the result of Australia’s absurd crime reality, Australia having perfected crime hiding/ignoring crime to an art form.
Australia has no functional law-enforcement, likely never had. People only find this out, if they try to report crimes punishable by many years in jail, like I did, as a public servant witness of such crimes in 2009.
Our police having neither, duty of care/accountability, while having a monopoly on what is a crime, freely refuse evidence for crimes, e.g. a medical report substantiating injuries suffered in a violent physical assault with a weapon, when they are unable to block a crime reporting attempt. A biker, whom I didn’t know at the time assaulted me in a likely staged road-rage incident on a busy Melbourne road, using his helmet as a weapon, causing permanent injuries. He abruptly left, when I started to bleed. I learnt later that he presented to Victoria Police voluntarily, while I was waiting for the police to turn up at the crime scene, bleeding. They never came, even though I called the Australian emergency number 000 twice & waited for about 40 minutes.
The biker volunteered a statement – allegedly – to police claiming that I assaulted him by jumping up & smashing my bare face into his helmet. Repeatedly. While he held bent down & firmly in place his helmeted head, because of the height difference between us?
Victoria Police subsequently refused medical evidence substantiating my injuries & let the biker walk free without a worry in the world “due to insufficient evidence” in 2018.
No one checked the feasibility of the biker’s claims, no one compared our size. Victoria Police forced me to fight at court in 2019 in an admitted silencing attempt instead, tried to entrap me 2x & started openly participating in the very crimes they were forcing me to fight at court to silence me about. My story is the norm in Australia. My treatment by all authorities came effortlessly & without any hesitation. This is why I cannot stay silent.
The technology capabilities Australia’s organised crime figures keep showing off are effective across country borders, they are freely sold/carried/posted/etc., because no one knows what devices are used for.
See 60 Minutes episode “Building Bad”, about Australia’s organised crime, e.g. Mick GATTO controlling the country’s most powerful union, the CFMEU. Mick GATTO brags about being able to stop anyone doing anything for good reasons. A few seconds after the t=820 time-stap Mark NEY, a former Assistant Commissioner at Australia’s Federal Police openly admits police doing nothing about proven crimes so serious, they are bankrupting the state of Victoria. No one will ever know how many people have escaped into suicide, how many “disappeared”.
The law is powerless, when it comes to contactless extortion capabilities via e.g. remotely delivered electric shocks. These shocks leave no indisputable physical evidence, crime victims risk their own institutionalisation, if they try to even seek protection against such harm types. I am writing from experience.
See my “Contactless Extortion”, “Weaponising Schizophrenia” & “Perfect Crimes” LinkedIn articles for more details. Being reduced to surviving crime-to-crime, living with the cumulative effects of thousands of devastating, unpunished crimes over 5,000+ days/nights since 2009 affect my writing. Thank you for your time.
#ididnotstaysilent
To the down-voters: thank you for drawing attention to my comment. Being ignored is far worse than being piled on. I am used to far worse by the MARCUCCI since 2009.
First electric shock (DARPA’s transcranial direct current stimulus sounds about right) last night was 20-30 minutes after I went to bed. At the cusp of falling asleep, as it is often the case. There may have been a dozen or more electric shocks/voice-to-skull incidents until dawn. There is no point in documenting any more details, there is no authority to turn to. The crimes of Australia’s government/military insiders are an internal affair. No one can force Australia to stop government/military insiders aiding organised crime, using these resources for their own sadistic pervert entertainment.
Today is 1 December 2024.
I continue taking my continued exposure to advanced crime technology used in contactless extortion as my dignity of purpose, my duty to expose Australia’s absurd crime reality. Because Australia’s lawlessness is an existential threat to Western civilisation.