Is smoking having a renaissance? At her recent birthday party, brat du jour Charli XCX was gifted a bouquet chaotically arranged with cigarettes. Meanwhile in Paris, the Olympic golfer Charley Hull was prevented by le woke mob from enjoying her custom of breezing through the course with a cig dangling from her lips, having been criticised for signing a load of autographs with one on the go at the US Open months before. And earlier this summer, Natalie Portman and Paul Mescal were spotted puffing away outside an Islington wine bar. According to The Guardian, all this suggests that smoking is “so back”.
Every few months a celebrity is papped with a cigarette, and lifestyle columns declare that we are living through a dangerous vibe shift — that this will be the generation which finally revives one of the most surefire ways to off yourself. But these latest viral moments simply represent another passing hiccup in an unstoppable project to stub the habit out entirely. The new smoking ban, which will prevent those born in or after 2009 from ever buying cigarettes, will ensure that in 20 years, smoking will just be something quaintly associated with Dot Cotton or Krusty the Clown, an anachronistic curiosity like a monocle or a pocket watch.
Charli XCX is 32, and Charley Hull is 28. In Bishop’s Stortford and Kettering respectively, their classmates would have smoked, not vaped, behind the bike sheds — a dying breed. But surely, you splutter, cigarettes are still cooler than Elf Bars? Well, yes. In the panopticon of Gen Z life, peering at one another through the fabricating prism of social media, being an “icon” is about carefully orchestrating optical illusions, gesturing towards passing “aesthetics”. Cigarettes are, according to internet people who never go outside, “iconic”. Charli’s apparent obsession with cocaine — “bumpin’” her way through her early thirties — is precisely the same as her brand’s fixation with smoking: 100% vibes-based, and curated to be just another feature of “brat”. It is all, of course, meaningless — and whether fans have ever seen cocaine in real life is irrelevant. Smoking, coke, negroni spagliatos: these are the modern-day equivalents of carnations, pearls or a tome in an Early Modern portrait. Whether they are truly used or owned by the sitter is beside the point: they simply gesture towards coveted attributes (betrothal, chastity, learnedness respectively) and so function as pure abstractions, symbols.
Gen Z will only ever see smoking in this light: as a symbol of rebellion, of thinness, of stress, of whatever they like. The thousand interpretations of this humble habit owe themselves to a few smoking-motif-obsessed filmmakers, including David Lynch — who last week revealed he had not left the house in two years over concerns about contracting Covid, having ravaged his emphysema-ridden lungs over a long career measured in glowing American Spirits. Nevertheless, the damage is done: the cigarette is so irrevocably a cinematic totem — standing in variously for a gun, a penis, a poison, a panacea — that nobody can now start smoking without feeling the weight of a century of associations. And as it becomes more verboten, more dangerous, the symbolism of the cigarette grows more and more unbearably self-referential.
For new Gen Z smokers, being “iconic” is the habit’s only social appeal — and it is entirely offset by other ideological neuroses. This is a generation which is so bound by the strictures of self-censorship, so boggled by the conventions of social media, that they have begun to use the term “unalived” instead of “killed” in general conversation. They are wimps, and looking cool (the only incentive for anybody ever to have picked up their first cigarette) cannot survive this.
Besides, is vice itself cool anymore? Once, substances were era-defining. From the birth of counterculture, each decade had their corresponding drug: the Sixties has its slow insanity, its hierarchy-smashing lassitude, the wonder-filled inertia of acid and marijuana. The Seventies has its bleak heroin, its fall from innocence, a decade of dark. The Eighties was all manic extravagance, cocaine to a T. On the dubiously sticky floors of Studio 54, the fast-paced, high-cost, high-speed shit chatting of coke crystallised that era’s gaudy hedonism. The Nineties had its euphoric, crashing manias, its acid house, its MDMA. After that, house parties dabbled in micro-trends — the bath salts, the ket, the NOS — but youth culture in general had by now stabilised, fuelled by immortal alcohol and a cocktail of other things that had all come before, becoming smugly ironic. All the while, smoking limped on, a sulky vampire in the corner of every sweaty student bedroom.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeSmoking is unhealthy (I have never smoked), but the radio jingles and short adverts from back in the day are surely some of the catchiest and cutest tunes that man has ever composed! Never fails to put a smile on my face (but not to buy a cigarette). I take it as a metaphor for all the bad, yet popular fads that one should identify and ignore.
“Winston tastes good like a cigarette should … “. 😉
The iconic Australian brand Winfield (catchphrase “Anyhow, have a Winfield”) had such an advertising penetration that they could put up a billboard which simply said “Anyhow”, and everyone would know it was a Winfield ad.
Great article, thanks. Although I won’t pretend to understand all the current cultural references (what the heck is “the lisp-inducing abomination that is Zyn”?).
Unherd can be a bit middle-aged and reactionary (he says, staring into the mirror). Good to hear some younger voices.
Zyn are little pouches of tobacco you keep in your mouth while the nicotine leeches out. You might be more familiar with Snus (which are similar).
And cause mouth cancer if used for any length of time… The same as chewing tobacco did!
Are you specifically on about nicotine pouches, or are you thinking of tobacco snus?
Zyn and their ilk are actually tobacco free. They are essentially teabags filled with soft plant fibres infused with nicotine and flavouring in a lab somewhere.
Like the old chewing tobacco?
Nope. Cigarettes are delicious. Adding danger only makes them more so. They are coming back like gang busters. We’re all living too long anyway.
Living longer but not allowed any fun along the way.
Exactly.
As they say, you don’t live any longer giving up drink and fags, it just feels like it.
I can see that smoking is something to be shared and bonds people. In movies sharing a cigarette helps to lower the defenses of the person you’re trying to get close to. The interrogator offers the captive suspect one as if to say you can trust me. I think there is a lot implied in sharing a cigarette
“It did not kill her in the end — on the contrary, it kept her sharp — but you couldn’t help but feel sorry for that yellowed woman in her yellowing, sunlit living room. That is, really, what smoking is about.”
This is confusing. Smoking didn’t kill her. So what, in the opinion of the writer, is smoking about. It’s an odd example; someone living into old age, unphased by the emotions of a 15 year old (who cares. Not her.), still sharp, and dies of something unrelated to smoking. Why did Poppy feel sorry for her, what could she know at 15 what old age was about?
Huh? She said smoking was about being cool. Then went on to explain why people don’t smoke as much anymore, because it turns you into an emphysema ridden sickly person. Then used her aunt as an example. The fact that smoking didn’t kill her seems to be beside the point. What is confusing here?
Used her aunt as an example of what?
That whole last paragraph makes no sense. One minute she’s in the nursing home the next minute she’s at home.
” The new smoking ban, which will prevent those born in or after 2009 from ever buying cigarettes, will ensure that in 20 years, [some naive statment here]”.
I hate cigarettes with a passion, it killed my mother and my sister, I’m glad that it is used less and less but that ban will ensure only the cigarettes will be contraband with a health illegal trade.
Spot on.
It has got to the point (here in Australia) that vaping is so constrained it is almost making people take up smoking tobacco by default.
Perhaps, although, I do wonder about the practicalities of being a smoker, especially a heavy smoker, if they are banned and cigarettes have to be acquired illegally. Users of other drugs don’t tend to use quite so much of them per day, and smoking is something often done in public.
I would think that smoking in public is rarely done these days.
*unfazed
Where are your editors, UnHerd?
That’s a very long article to have seemingly been inspired by an opinion piece in the Guardian. I got no further. Come on, UnHerd, the subscription’s pricier than a carton of gaspers – please commission something with a bit more substance.
We can then indulge, via Comments, in substance abuse.
It’s 5 bucks a month. I think we can take a break from shouting at each other over politics to enjoy an opinion piece here and there. Sheesh.
“The new smoking ban, which will prevent those born in or after 2009 from ever buying cigarettes, will ensure that in 20 years, smoking will just be something quaintly associated with Dot Cotton or Krusty the Clown, an anachronistic curiosity like a monocle or a pocket watch“. Yeah, because people never ever ingest substances when it is illegal to do so.
Have these people never heard about how prohibitiion played out? Or thought about how two teenagers born only days apart will react if one of them is banned for life and the other isn’t? And what will the courts do if a post 2009-born adult says ‘Well I choose to smoke?’, lock them up with real criminals? This is a shambles in the making which is going to make government itself look foolish.
Apart from a brief flirtation with the occasional Cuban cigar about 20 years ago, I have never been a smoker. I have on occasion thought about taking it up to annoy the puritans who want to go around banning enjoyable things. Still, I ended up satisfying myself by taking a lot of other things society disapproves of.
With respect. I think the child who wrote this drivel full of cool speak “vibe’s” etc. should put her smartphone down and go for a long walk. Preferably outside in the fresh air. She might find that it starts to cure her of her babbling verbose twittery.
For God’s sake get a life Poppy, and to Unherd please rid your pages of her and her kind.
If you don’t like her, just don’t read her, old man
Seriously, what is it with this website’s subscribers being so volatile toward the writers here when the piece doesn’t fit the exact narrative they are in the mood for. Seriously weird.
They think because they pay for a subscription they have the right to criticize the writers.
Exactly!
Smoking is all over the place now. So I’m not sure it’s just minor.
Nah, it’s definitely back.
Symbols of rebellion but no actual rebellion from the most conformist generation in history. Well what to expect when you’ve all been through the 50 grand conformity factories, anxious to get today’s right answer, struggling to be a bigger teachers pet than the rest of the class and wowwying that one wrong step will destroy your future. So sad.
The cost of cigarettes will stop people smoking. Most cost about £15 for 20. When I started it was 50p for 20 in 1979. When I stopped in 2014, it was £7 for 20. If you are a casual smoker, you will get by. If you are serious, then you might have to remortgage your house…
Here in Australia, the high cost of cigarettes has caused the sale of illicit (namely untaxed) tobacco (called “chop chop”) to boom.
It’s literally seeing your money going up in smoke.
Childishly wrong.
The UK’s idiotic smoking ban won’t work, it will only make it more attractive to the young to smoke.
The world’s axis is shifting to Asia and there, they smoke, a lot.
Overall, cigarette sales over the past decade have barely moved, certainly not disappeared.
I’ve never smoked and I don’t like it when people near me do but that doesn’t mean that wishful thinking changes reality.
Today’s youth are not interested in doing things that are against the grain as they have been indoctrinated more than ever in primary and secondary schools. They will be dutiful comrades.
You misunderstand that time is still passing. The youth of yesterday are now moving towards the middle of their lives while the new young generation are nihilistic, distrustful of all traditional institutions and cynical.
When being told that tobacco is killing them and smoking will kill them faster plenty will respond “all the better” plus if big tobacco can associate smoking with a bygone era when men were men they’re well placed for a revival among the young .
I should disclaim I hate smoking with a passion, I’ve never smoked and won’t, but I really have a problem with the government going around telling people what they can and can’t put in their bodies. I also think banning smoking is just going to make it super exciting and dangerous and become the new way for youth to express rebellion and nonconformity, and that the idiots running Airstrip one are stupid for not realizing this.
This my cousins across the pond is why you don’t support anything that government wants to do that expands their authority, they start with something you agree with then they start jailing you for mean sayings said on the internet.
Well, it’s something to do in your twenties and thirties. Later in my 20s I couldn’t even afford a packet of 20 so smoked evenmore rolling tobacco. I got using the nicotine gum and would just smoke socially. After Covid-19 and diabetes I gave up completely in my mid-40s which was a 2-year process.
I’m given to understand tobacco is harder to quit than heroin.
I occasionally binge smoke, but I like Zyn and Nordic Spirit better these days. Vaping is too complicated.
Fun article, cheers poppy
Nothings cool anymore, everyone is just sitting around on their phones
Who is this joyless scold?!
Great piece. Although, it applies to the UK only. Other, far less neurotic European nations, are chuffing away quite happily.
Hilarious that he thinks the smoking ban will work. As if anything the government ever does goes according to plan.
Sorry but this doesn’t jibe at all w/what I’ve seen in the rest of Europe. When I was in Italy, pre-covid in 2019, if I had to guess, I’d say ~50% of young people aged ~16-30 smoked. And outdoor seating at most restaurants almost all had ashtrays.