Heather Armstrong didn’t mean to become a “mommy blogger”. In 1997, she taught herself to code, and began working at a Los Angeles tech start-up. When she started writing about her life online, her focus was Dilbert-style office politics. The title of the blog, “Dooce”, which eventually became better-known than her own name, came from a misspelling of “dude” in a group chat. Eventually, her unwise online disclosures got her fired — “Dooced”, as the process of sacking incautious bloggers came to be called.
Armstrong started mining the rest of her life. Dooce pivoted to offering carefully-scripted “unvarnished realities” on parenthood, marriage, and Armstrong’s struggles with depression. The market in the early 2000s was far less crowded than it was even a decade later, allowing a cornball line like this to land in a way it probably wouldn’t today: “I am here to tell you that there is no possible way to have an 8-pound creature GUMMING your tender nipple without the slightest bit of discomfort……the only way to describe it to a man is to suggest that he lay out his naked penis on a chopping block, place a manual stapler on the sacred helmet head, and bang in a couple hundred staples.” Off the back of insights such as these, Armstrong gained a monthly readership of 8.5 million fans, raking in anywhere from $30,000 to $50,000 a month at her peak. In 2011, Forbes ranked her 26th on its list of most the influential women in all media. Federated Media, the entity responsible for managing advertisements on her blog, celebrated Armstrong as one of their most prosperous bloggers, a top performer who generated over $1 million a year in ad revenue.
The same year, Armstrong contributed a foreword to Mom Blogging for Dummies, writing: “Some women who do what I do reject this label altogether because they consider the term mommy to be belittling. I understand this complaint, but I’m quite proud to be a member of this movement, this revolution of women determining their own destinies.” Hers is a cautionary tale, however, for those of us who write and consume content for a living.
Armstrong’s fame and online presence had greatly receded by the time she committed suicide at home earlier this year. In The Valedictorian of Being Dead, published in 2019, she details a life spent battling depression — on ten occasions, she went into a medically-induced coma, simulating brain death, in an attempt to alleviate her symptoms. Somewhere between introducing a guide to making money from nonstop mommy blogging and declaring mommy blogging dead, Armstrong came to recognise — or decided to admit — the negative impact her work was having on her mental health. In the foreword, she writes with a sense of pride, “I don’t get to go on vacation.” In The Valedictorian of Being Dead, she expressed her longing for an escape “the hamster wheel of my day-to-day existence”:
“I knew I just couldn’t do it anymore when I was trying to get my kids into the car to play a word game while driving to a ranch in the mountains. This would be the third of three posts I was to write for an automotive brand about quality time with my kids in the car … Marlo did not want to participate in yet another ruse, and I had to bribe and threaten and cajole to get her in that car. Right as she opened her door, she looked up at me through tears and begged, ‘Please, Mom, don’t make me do this.’”
Armstrong’s transition from viewing her work as a fulfilling occupation to a trap reflects the paradoxical reality of life as a content creator: the same facts, framed differently as market conditions changed, transformed from a testament of her dedication to a cry for relief. But it also speaks to a universal experience of life lived in the digital age. Her journey — from a person who wrote about her life on the internet for fun to an entrepreneur supporting not only her family but also employees with her blog revenues — illustrates the tremendous opportunity of the dotcom boom. But it also reveals the precarity inherent in what was then a burgeoning marketplace of intimate stories that would, as one critic observed later, gradually evolve into a “personal-essay industrial complex”.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThoughtful and insightful. Made me care about someone I have never heard of.
Thoughtful and insightful. Made me care about someone I have never heard of.
It’s another predictable tragedy. She sold her soul and it didn’t end well. The usual trajectory: initially she was in control, or had the illusion of being in control, then she was controlled. It happens with drug addiction: at first the drugs make the user feel better then addiction takes control and misery ensues. Also prostitution as depicted by William Hogarth’s series of paintings: The Harlot’s Progress. To survive, prostitutes often try to separate body and soul by making it clear their body is for sale but not their soul, for example by refusing to kiss their clients.
Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.
It’s another predictable tragedy. She sold her soul and it didn’t end well. The usual trajectory: initially she was in control, or had the illusion of being in control, then she was controlled. It happens with drug addiction: at first the drugs make the user feel better then addiction takes control and misery ensues. Also prostitution as depicted by William Hogarth’s series of paintings: The Harlot’s Progress. To survive, prostitutes often try to separate body and soul by making it clear their body is for sale but not their soul, for example by refusing to kiss their clients.
Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.
This article very much feeds into the discussion around identity in the internet age that few people seem to wish to fully engage in – possibly because it’s “too close to home”.
There are elements of engaging with online communities (and that includes Unherd) that can lead to a distortion of all but the most secure personalities, many of whom fall by the wayside or seek to re-invent themselves under a different username.
The most telling thing about Heather Armstrong was her vulnerability, not her skill as a blogger. It would appear there was nothing left to sustain her personality once the decline of affirmation set in. It really does open up the discussion about what exactly constitutes a “person” who holds this personality, but as said, few wish to go there.
This article very much feeds into the discussion around identity in the internet age that few people seem to wish to fully engage in – possibly because it’s “too close to home”.
There are elements of engaging with online communities (and that includes Unherd) that can lead to a distortion of all but the most secure personalities, many of whom fall by the wayside or seek to re-invent themselves under a different username.
The most telling thing about Heather Armstrong was her vulnerability, not her skill as a blogger. It would appear there was nothing left to sustain her personality once the decline of affirmation set in. It really does open up the discussion about what exactly constitutes a “person” who holds this personality, but as said, few wish to go there.
Good article. Part of the problem is the woke insistence that we can only write about what we know directly, for fear of “appropriation”.
Nowadays, every pop-singer, every story-teller, they’re all banging a drum about “my journey”.
If, like writers used to do, you just make shit up, then you swerve this self-cannibalism, and this tail-wags-dog effect.
With the likes of Adele, you get the feeling she needs a divorce to give her something to write about.
My fav rock band is 1970s/80s era Manchester post-punk contrarians, The Fall. Never a hint of “my journey” slop with them. Instead, you got obscure rants about German athletes, Scottish uprisings, Australians in Europe, fat vicars being ripped to pieces, British people in hot weather etc. All miles better than that awful Taylor-Sheeran navel-gazing which is part of the solipsist culture which leads to the kind of tragedy outlined above. Poor woman. Sympathy with her family.
Good article. Part of the problem is the woke insistence that we can only write about what we know directly, for fear of “appropriation”.
Nowadays, every pop-singer, every story-teller, they’re all banging a drum about “my journey”.
If, like writers used to do, you just make shit up, then you swerve this self-cannibalism, and this tail-wags-dog effect.
With the likes of Adele, you get the feeling she needs a divorce to give her something to write about.
My fav rock band is 1970s/80s era Manchester post-punk contrarians, The Fall. Never a hint of “my journey” slop with them. Instead, you got obscure rants about German athletes, Scottish uprisings, Australians in Europe, fat vicars being ripped to pieces, British people in hot weather etc. All miles better than that awful Taylor-Sheeran navel-gazing which is part of the solipsist culture which leads to the kind of tragedy outlined above. Poor woman. Sympathy with her family.
Is it any wonder that a in a consumer culture we have turned life itself into a commodity.
We may indeed have done so, but I don’t see any evidence in this piece that this blogger’s suicide had to do with her loss of readership. Note the author’s resort to phrases such as “seems like”, or general claims that may or may not have to do with this specific example–though he attempts to finesse these connections. In any case she apparently already suffered from depression.
Now, blaming the cruel world of “content creation” or “personal branding” to an audience unfamiliar with its details and easily moved by an innocent victim: that strikes me as a lucrative and relatively easy source of content.
We may indeed have done so, but I don’t see any evidence in this piece that this blogger’s suicide had to do with her loss of readership. Note the author’s resort to phrases such as “seems like”, or general claims that may or may not have to do with this specific example–though he attempts to finesse these connections. In any case she apparently already suffered from depression.
Now, blaming the cruel world of “content creation” or “personal branding” to an audience unfamiliar with its details and easily moved by an innocent victim: that strikes me as a lucrative and relatively easy source of content.
Is it any wonder that a in a consumer culture we have turned life itself into a commodity.
Does the author of this piece believe that the blogger believed her blogging was truly “therapeutic”? Or is it more likely the case that she said it so often because of course that’s what her audience wished to believe?
I can’t help but notice the author of this piece mentions his own “therapist”. Does he ever get the impression that therapists also tend to tell their clients what they wish to hear?
“wish to hear” or (the therapists) wish to hear themselves saying?
“wish to hear” or (the therapists) wish to hear themselves saying?
Does the author of this piece believe that the blogger believed her blogging was truly “therapeutic”? Or is it more likely the case that she said it so often because of course that’s what her audience wished to believe?
I can’t help but notice the author of this piece mentions his own “therapist”. Does he ever get the impression that therapists also tend to tell their clients what they wish to hear?
To my mind, the unanswered question is, once her business failed, what kept her from creating a new product? Didn’t she have an agent who could offer advice?
But perhaps the most interesting thing in this piece, which unfortunately goes unaddressed, is that, if indeed she committed suicide because of business failure, that is far more typical of men. You don’t hear that of women so often. Did she put the same career pressure on herself as a man would? Again, you just don’t hear about that from women. Ironic for someone whose content and brand is quintessentially female.
To my mind, the unanswered question is, once her business failed, what kept her from creating a new product? Didn’t she have an agent who could offer advice?
But perhaps the most interesting thing in this piece, which unfortunately goes unaddressed, is that, if indeed she committed suicide because of business failure, that is far more typical of men. You don’t hear that of women so often. Did she put the same career pressure on herself as a man would? Again, you just don’t hear about that from women. Ironic for someone whose content and brand is quintessentially female.
If you design your life for consumption, it will be consumed.
And then what?
Is it surprising that the resultant void is terrifying?
When your existence is a sold joke, a good story paid for, a cute anecdote, a telling illustration of what to do and not…when your lived experience becomes simply a search for new monetizable content, and your life choices are made with a wink & a nod towards subscribers and boosting ad sales….what do you become when there’s nothing left to laugh about, make fun of, satirize, or ridicule? Who are you after you’ve sold it all? What really is left?
“And you may ask yourself, “Well, how did I get here?”
“You may ask yourself, “What is that beautiful house?” You may ask yourself, “Where does that highway go to?” And you may ask yourself, “Am I right? Am I wrong?” And you may say to yourself, “My God, what have I done?”
Not the first and clearly not the last to discover that the absolute, objectification of Self is a ‘Dorian Gray’ kind of bargain. In the end, it seems the sad Ms. Armstrong found the end result too much to bear.
If you design your life for consumption, it will be consumed.
And then what?
Is it surprising that the resultant void is terrifying?
When your existence is a sold joke, a good story paid for, a cute anecdote, a telling illustration of what to do and not…when your lived experience becomes simply a search for new monetizable content, and your life choices are made with a wink & a nod towards subscribers and boosting ad sales….what do you become when there’s nothing left to laugh about, make fun of, satirize, or ridicule? Who are you after you’ve sold it all? What really is left?
“And you may ask yourself, “Well, how did I get here?”
“You may ask yourself, “What is that beautiful house?” You may ask yourself, “Where does that highway go to?” And you may ask yourself, “Am I right? Am I wrong?” And you may say to yourself, “My God, what have I done?”
Not the first and clearly not the last to discover that the absolute, objectification of Self is a ‘Dorian Gray’ kind of bargain. In the end, it seems the sad Ms. Armstrong found the end result too much to bear.
Heartbreaking article.
Heartbreaking article.
I could not read after a bit – I do not know where you went with this tragic woman – but it seemed you were like a vampire with her horrible story to score some point you had figured to sell a story. The up down votes will tell If I am totally wrong – which may be – but why even burden us with this gratuitous bit of misery? Why make some morality tale out of her horrendous suffering? Just write your ideas standing alone and leave her in her sad grave. Or not – maybe you did a great job of it – but I could not keep reading after her medically induced comas to try to break her out of her hellish affliction, not after beginning with her bit of comedy – then moving to her children.
Sorry if I am wrong….
RIP
“…but why even burden us with this gratuitous bit of misery?”
I read it as a cautionary tale for all of the ‘influencers’ out there. It’s become a career path for many – create content, make money, create more content, make more money, etc. It becomes a hamster wheel, it seems – you must always be creating content or you become old news and lose your sponsors/advertisers. Many seem to be exposing themselves to the world as they think through whatever is ailing them. Doing it publicly (creating ‘content’) maybe isn’t such a good idea but it’s everywhere on the web. Eventually people get bored with you and you have to deal with the fallout of that. His suggestion of keeping a private journal seems like a good one for struggling people as an alternative. But, clicks and likes are addictive, in addition to being profitable
“…but why even burden us with this gratuitous bit of misery?”
I read it as a cautionary tale for all of the ‘influencers’ out there. It’s become a career path for many – create content, make money, create more content, make more money, etc. It becomes a hamster wheel, it seems – you must always be creating content or you become old news and lose your sponsors/advertisers. Many seem to be exposing themselves to the world as they think through whatever is ailing them. Doing it publicly (creating ‘content’) maybe isn’t such a good idea but it’s everywhere on the web. Eventually people get bored with you and you have to deal with the fallout of that. His suggestion of keeping a private journal seems like a good one for struggling people as an alternative. But, clicks and likes are addictive, in addition to being profitable
I could not read after a bit – I do not know where you went with this tragic woman – but it seemed you were like a vampire with her horrible story to score some point you had figured to sell a story. The up down votes will tell If I am totally wrong – which may be – but why even burden us with this gratuitous bit of misery? Why make some morality tale out of her horrendous suffering? Just write your ideas standing alone and leave her in her sad grave. Or not – maybe you did a great job of it – but I could not keep reading after her medically induced comas to try to break her out of her hellish affliction, not after beginning with her bit of comedy – then moving to her children.
Sorry if I am wrong….
RIP
Very easy on the eye…
This is an absolutely relevant comment. Maybe if you are beautiful enough it’s always hard to adjust to losing the attention/admiration.
This is an absolutely relevant comment. Maybe if you are beautiful enough it’s always hard to adjust to losing the attention/admiration.
Very easy on the eye…