X Close

What Hong Kongers fear in Britain The émigré community knows it is being watched

The monster's claw: a pro-democracy supporter in Kowloon. Credit: Manan Vatsyayana/AFP/Getty Images

The monster's claw: a pro-democracy supporter in Kowloon. Credit: Manan Vatsyayana/AFP/Getty Images


December 5, 2022   7 mins

We are being watched. We may be 6,000 miles from the Pearl River Delta, but that does not stop the long arm of the Chinese state reaching into this sports hall in a small town in South Gloucestershire.

I am talking to members of the ballooning Hong Kong community in sleepy Bradley Stoke — over the din of badminton shuttlecocks being batted back and forth and ceremonial swords whooshing through the air as older residents practise tai chi.

No one dares give their real name. Some even hesitate to give their age, in case it might somehow lead to their identification.

Are they scared of endangering their family back home? “No,” says one man. “It is because of the place you’re interviewing in. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but there is actually one spy from the Chinese government behind us,” he adds with a nervous laugh. “So we have to be careful what kind of information we’re sharing.” I ask if we should continue outside, to sidestep the amateur agent, but he insists we stay put. “I think 70% of them actually can’t understand English. But they want to show they’re listening.”

In 2020, following a wave of pro-democracy protests, China imposed a draconian new security law on Hong Kong. It made crimes of secession, subversion, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces punishable by a maximum sentence of life in prison, with the possibility of cases being heard behind closed doors and defendants being spirited away for trials in mainland China. Hundreds of activists and former opposition lawmakers have since been arrested.

Britain said the clampdown broke a guarantee of freedoms it agreed with China in the 1997 handover deal, and ministers responded in February 2021 by providing an escape hatch — a “bespoke visa route” for anyone registered with British National (Overseas), or BNO, status before 1997, along with their partners and dependent relatives. In all, 5.2 million people, or two thirds of the population, are eligible to live, work and study in the UK for up to five years, after which they can settle permanently (and can apply for citizenship 12 months after that).

And so, over the past year, roughly 1,000 Hong Kongers have moved to South Gloucestershire. At the Aerospace Bristol museum in October, local agencies came together with the Chinese Community Wellbeing Society for a welcome event attended by 250 people. And at the Konbini Asian supermarket in nearby Patchway, managers have been buying exotic fruits and vegetables — from shark fin melon to choy sum greens — to cater to them.

The new arrivals say they chose the area around Bristol for its moderate climate, good schools, low crime rates and relatively affordable housing (new-builds are much favoured over what one calls “second-hand properties”). Many have also been attracted by a YouTube influencer, Canaan K, who has amassed 60,000 followers in two years by producing Cantonese videos on everything from UK income tax to Primark sales, while gushing about the wonders of BS32. “They think this is the place to be — according to her,” explains one of Bradley Stoke’s newcomers.

Daniel*, who is in his thirties, says he escaped so he can speak freely and “go everywhere without worries”. The last straw was the smartphone app the Hong Kong government instituted ostensibly because of Covid, but which he says is a “monitoring system so they know everywhere you go”. He had to abandon “my family, my friends, my dogs”. Yet he does not consider himself a refugee. “I think we are liberated,” is how he prefers to put it.

Liberation, however, has its limits. Everyone here knows about the incident in October when a man believed to be Beijing’s consul general in Manchester ripped down pro-democracy posters, and looked on as one protester was dragged into consulate grounds and beaten so badly he was hospitalised.

“I was shocked,” says Daniel, “but not surprised. From what we’re gathering from the news, the Chinese government even set up police stations in foreign countries. It is effective. If you look at Xinjiang [where more than a million Uyghur Muslims are thought to be detained in “re-education camps”], you know what’s happening.” What are his worst fears? “Just that Hong Kong will become another China.”

The territory is also suffering economically, in part thanks to strict Covid lockdowns. In September, it lost its crown as Asia’s leading financial centre to Singapore in a respected global index. And its population fell by a record 1.6% in the past year, with 113,200 residents emigrating. Only this week, protests flared up again, echoing the anti-lockdown demonstrations that have swept across the mainland.

Candy Choy is the only person I can find who will agree to be named (she also approached more than 30 families on my behalf, but all declined to talk). “I love Hong Kong,” she says. “But unfortunately, Hong Kong didn’t love me.” A pastor and mother of two, who lives in neighbouring Stoke Gifford, she was recruited by the West of England Baptist Network to channel BNOs to the local churches and help them adapt to British life. She says she did not want her children to continue being “brainwashed” and had had enough of “self-checking” every time she ministered. “I was very stressed. But I’m not stressed now.”

Still, she says many arrivals take precautions — including declining to give their new contact details to loved ones back home. “Sometimes we want to disconnect from them. So we didn’t tell anyone when we left. The police can find some excuse to arrest you. We don’t give our addresses — to protect us, and our families in Hong Kong.”

Choy says she has been savouring her liberty in Britain — googling anything she likes without hesitation and marvelling at the right to lampoon those in the highest offices in the land (her daughter asked in astonishment how the British were allowed to make jokes about the Queen). And she enthuses about the warm welcome she has received. “My neighbours mainly are local people and they invited me to many jubilees, bonfires and Christmas parties.”

No one here has a single racist incident to report. The only complaints anyone can muster are confusion about the council’s recycling system and the strict British penalties for parking and speeding. Oh, and the food. “Honestly?” says one, “it’s just chips and chicken.” Another regrets that she has not been able to find a steak in the area that actually has “a meat taste”. A third looks at me in horror as he describes what sounds like an almost mythical dish he is yet to encounter: “The London eel.”

I meet Helen*, a wary mother of three, at a pub in Bradley Stoke. “I think I escaped from a monster’s claw — because of the kindness of the English government,” she says. The 44-year-old accepts that the Hong Kong she knew and loved is no more. “It was very beautiful,” she recalls wistfully. “It was wonderful, it was energetic. It was full of freedom and mass media. Now they only take dictation.” In June last year, Apple Daily, Hong Kong’s largest pro-democracy paper, announced its closure after 26 years following police raids. Its founder, Jimmy Lai, is in jail.

Does she not find the small-town life of Bradley Stoke humdrum compared with the bustle of Hong Kong’s metropolis? In fact, she insists, she loves all the trees and the wide, open space. Plus, she says: “I’m too busy to be bored.” Helen is renting, in an area with rising prices, in part thanks to this wave of immigration. It means she works one full-time job, plus one or two part-time jobs each day, and is still not making ends meet — using her dwindling savings to make up the shortfall. “If the news reporters always focus on the majority, of the wealthy who have left Hong Kong, they will ignore the minority — people who are poor, who are struggling.”

Even those with capital from selling their expensive properties have had to adjust their career expectations in Bradley Stoke. Professors have found themselves working in Tesco warehouses. One woman from mainland China tells me how impressed she was with the Hong Kongers who arrived to work with her at a food factory — doing 12-hour shifts cooking up English soups and sauces. “They don’t want any benefits. They say: ‘We appreciate that the UK, during a difficult time, invites us to come. We want to do something for the society.’ I like their spirit.” But she is also aware of the suspicion they have for mainlanders like her. Some recoil even at the sight of Simplified Chinese characters, which they associate with the Beijing regime.

Helen joined the “Umbrella Revolution” protests in 2014 and demonstrations against a proposed extradition treaty to the mainland in 2019 — when dissent was still legal — dressing in black and singing the movement’s two protest songs, “Do You Hear the People Sing?” from Les Misérables and the Cantonese anthem “Glory to Hong Kong”. She is wary of other Hong Kongers in Bradley Stoke unless she is sure they were fellow protesters like her. “I keep a very, very careful eye on them,” she says, explaining she will look out to see if they have a yellow umbrella symbol “on their cup or on their keyring”. She is terrified someone will report her to the Chinese authorities, who would ban her from ever returning home to see her parents.

Rachel*, another Bradley Stoke BNO, says she is “very blessed” compared with those who failed to make it out. They were stopped at the airport, she says, “and then they disappeared. My friends — key persons who organised all protests — their mobile phones always are switched off. After 2019, some teenagers disappeared and their parents also found them disconnected. These are the facts.”

According to the older émigrés, there is still a strong bond with Britain, which first occupied the region in 1841. Helen says they “love Pang Ding-hong”, the Cantonese name for Chris Patten, the last governor of Hong Kong. But Daniel says the sentiment is disappearing fast from the territory itself. “Those who have affection for Britain, underneath, they still love it. But now you just don’t say anything because the majority of those who feel the same have already moved to the UK.”

Many Brits feel our government has done precious little over the years to safeguard democracy in Hong Kong. Even Lord Patten says: “We should have delivered more explicitly on what was promised.” But the exiles in Bradley Stoke are pragmatic — and sanguine. “It is not just that China is too powerful,” says Daniel. “They’re brutal and barbaric.” Helen adds: “We just think no one can help us. But the UK government is one of the solutions. She will not very strongly make conflict with China, but now she gives us a gate to escape. And, for me, that’s enough.”

* Names and other details have been changed to protect identities.

***

Order your copy of UnHerd’s first print edition here


Etan Smallman is a freelance journalist.

EtanSmallman

Join the discussion


Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber


To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.

Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.

Subscribe
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago

Great immigrants, UK is lucky to have them.

But there is an odd thing going on in the West – our security services, the ones with letters – and numbers, throughout the Five-Eyes, are Rogue.

5-eyes… CIA is not allowed to track Americans – so they have MI6 do it, then give them the data… haha, how to obey the law but violate the spirit of it – I am sure it is recripocated.
The Jan 6 are mostly political prisoners, the crazy Gov Witmer thing, I know they are watching the people here. Homeland is now watching Americans.

Governments are now turning their security State on the Civilians in violation to every rule of Western Constitutions, meddling in Elections – gone….Rogue. China is a slave state I feel – no freedom. Social Credit Scores. Phone tracking, digitizing money, facial, gait, syntax, retina, finger print, DNA – all recognition from millions of cameras, they want that here I guess. –

Then here the Social Media and Google and everyone else is tracking every thing you do – they will be hand in hand with the Government, it is headed that way. Now everyone’s medical records in USA are a dossier on you, they are now linked from all health care providers – for your good…no… Once a CBDC is taken up it is over.

This was what the entire Vaccine thing in the world was – to get the phones to track us with Covid Passports, to make the West like China, to get us used to violations of rights, to allow monitoring and locking and be suspicious of each other. It was not about the flu…..

The world is changing fast – I am glad they are here, but we are getting a bit like their home – lets up hope this can be reversed.

Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago

Great immigrants, UK is lucky to have them.

But there is an odd thing going on in the West – our security services, the ones with letters – and numbers, throughout the Five-Eyes, are Rogue.

5-eyes… CIA is not allowed to track Americans – so they have MI6 do it, then give them the data… haha, how to obey the law but violate the spirit of it – I am sure it is recripocated.
The Jan 6 are mostly political prisoners, the crazy Gov Witmer thing, I know they are watching the people here. Homeland is now watching Americans.

Governments are now turning their security State on the Civilians in violation to every rule of Western Constitutions, meddling in Elections – gone….Rogue. China is a slave state I feel – no freedom. Social Credit Scores. Phone tracking, digitizing money, facial, gait, syntax, retina, finger print, DNA – all recognition from millions of cameras, they want that here I guess. –

Then here the Social Media and Google and everyone else is tracking every thing you do – they will be hand in hand with the Government, it is headed that way. Now everyone’s medical records in USA are a dossier on you, they are now linked from all health care providers – for your good…no… Once a CBDC is taken up it is over.

This was what the entire Vaccine thing in the world was – to get the phones to track us with Covid Passports, to make the West like China, to get us used to violations of rights, to allow monitoring and locking and be suspicious of each other. It was not about the flu…..

The world is changing fast – I am glad they are here, but we are getting a bit like their home – lets up hope this can be reversed.

Peter B
Peter B
1 year ago

Hold on a moment. Before beating ourselves up about not defending democracy in Hong Kong, it’s probably worth remembering that Britain never ran Hong Kong as a democracy ! Let’s leave the hand-wringing and rewriting of history to Chris Patten and co.
That said, it was certainly a lot freer than it is now and no surprise that Hong Kongers who can are voting with their feet. It sounds like they’re good, hard-working, honest people who we’re in many ways lucky to have. We need more people with those values – the ones we used to have.

Peter B
Peter B
1 year ago

Hold on a moment. Before beating ourselves up about not defending democracy in Hong Kong, it’s probably worth remembering that Britain never ran Hong Kong as a democracy ! Let’s leave the hand-wringing and rewriting of history to Chris Patten and co.
That said, it was certainly a lot freer than it is now and no surprise that Hong Kongers who can are voting with their feet. It sounds like they’re good, hard-working, honest people who we’re in many ways lucky to have. We need more people with those values – the ones we used to have.

Noel Chiappa
Noel Chiappa
1 year ago

I think the Hong Kong Chinese, underneath it all, were Chinese, and had a lot in common with Chinese on the mainland, and felt that the British ownership of Hong Kong (HK Island and Kowloon weren’t leased) was an insult to China (which it was, in a way), and thus had positive reactions to the handover. What’s that saying, ‘be careful what you wish for’?
The Chinese government may have been foolish to step on Hong Kong – but maybe from their point of view it was the right move: free thought and free speech were a bigger danger to ‘their’ China than the economic and intellectual creativity of Hong Kong were an advantage.
I’m glad these people have been able to escape – and I’m sure they will be a great benefit to the countries they move to. Hong Kong was an extraordinary place precisely because it united the best of both East and West; hopefully they’ll be able to do it in their new homes. They’ve seen all too well that their dream of a united, free China was just that, a dream.

Noel Chiappa
Noel Chiappa
1 year ago

I think the Hong Kong Chinese, underneath it all, were Chinese, and had a lot in common with Chinese on the mainland, and felt that the British ownership of Hong Kong (HK Island and Kowloon weren’t leased) was an insult to China (which it was, in a way), and thus had positive reactions to the handover. What’s that saying, ‘be careful what you wish for’?
The Chinese government may have been foolish to step on Hong Kong – but maybe from their point of view it was the right move: free thought and free speech were a bigger danger to ‘their’ China than the economic and intellectual creativity of Hong Kong were an advantage.
I’m glad these people have been able to escape – and I’m sure they will be a great benefit to the countries they move to. Hong Kong was an extraordinary place precisely because it united the best of both East and West; hopefully they’ll be able to do it in their new homes. They’ve seen all too well that their dream of a united, free China was just that, a dream.

M. M.
M. M.
1 year ago

Last edited 1 year ago by M. M.
Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago
Reply to  M. M.

”A new CNN/Time poll conducted just before the handover with 800 Hong Kong residents seems to indicate they are optimistic. Six out of every 10 residents said they thought reunification with China was a good thing, and one of every two felt that maintaining social order was more important than democracy.”

above from your link

I remember the handover, not well, and am not going to research it, but my feeling was that the lease expired, and so it was a done deal. No 90 miles of water like Taiwan – also the legal lease on Hong Kong expired, and I did not think Britain had any chance to make Hong Kong anything but return to China.

Given that, it would seem the residents would try to make the best of it, they would know acceptance was the path to survival. An ‘It is what it is’ reality. To go into unification with a rebellion mindset (and to have a record of what they thought) would not get off on the right foot. Look – even these immigrants do not wish to speak of what they actually believe to a reporter, anonymously, in UK.

Last edited 1 year ago by Jonas Moze
William McKinney
William McKinney
1 year ago
Reply to  Jonas Moze

To clarify, the 99 year lease was on the New Territories. HK island and Kowloon had been ceded by China in the mid-C19 and were therefore held in perpetuity. So no lease expiry. The government at the time – negotiations started in earnest in 1979 – decided it would be impractical to hold HK/Kowloon without the NT and consequently all parts of HK were ceded to China in 1997.

William McKinney
William McKinney
1 year ago
Reply to  Jonas Moze

To clarify, the 99 year lease was on the New Territories. HK island and Kowloon had been ceded by China in the mid-C19 and were therefore held in perpetuity. So no lease expiry. The government at the time – negotiations started in earnest in 1979 – decided it would be impractical to hold HK/Kowloon without the NT and consequently all parts of HK were ceded to China in 1997.

Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago
Reply to  M. M.

”A new CNN/Time poll conducted just before the handover with 800 Hong Kong residents seems to indicate they are optimistic. Six out of every 10 residents said they thought reunification with China was a good thing, and one of every two felt that maintaining social order was more important than democracy.”

above from your link

I remember the handover, not well, and am not going to research it, but my feeling was that the lease expired, and so it was a done deal. No 90 miles of water like Taiwan – also the legal lease on Hong Kong expired, and I did not think Britain had any chance to make Hong Kong anything but return to China.

Given that, it would seem the residents would try to make the best of it, they would know acceptance was the path to survival. An ‘It is what it is’ reality. To go into unification with a rebellion mindset (and to have a record of what they thought) would not get off on the right foot. Look – even these immigrants do not wish to speak of what they actually believe to a reporter, anonymously, in UK.

Last edited 1 year ago by Jonas Moze
M. M.
M. M.
1 year ago

Last edited 1 year ago by M. M.
M. M.
M. M.
1 year ago

Etan Smallman wrote, “In 2020, following a wave of pro-democracy protests, China imposed a draconian new security law on Hong Kong. … Hundreds of activists and former opposition lawmakers have since been arrested.”

For many decades before the handover of Hong Kong in 1997, the Hong Kongers had been aware of the atrocities committed by the mainland Chinese. Yet, the majority of Hong Kongers in 1997 still supported placing Hong Kong under the rule of Beijing. For most Hong Kongers, Chinese nationalism is more important than human rights or democracy.

Westerners should not waste a drop of blood nor treasure on helping the Chinese in Hong Kong or the rest of China.

If the Chinese genuinely support human rights and democracy, China would already be a Western nation. No foreign power is imposing the current brutal authoritarian government on China. This government exists because the majority of Chinese support it.

Furthermore, in 1997, most Hong Kongers favored (1) unification with China and the concomitant strangulation of human rights over (2) independence as the Republic of Hong Kong and the concomitant guarantee of human rights that they enjoyed under British rule. Indeed, on the day of the handover, millions of Hong Kongers celebrated in public parties. For most Hong Kongers, Chinese nationalism is more important than human rights or democracy. The Chinese (in Hong Kong and elsewhere) differ greatly from the Europeans.

In 1997, a poll by CNN indicated that 60% of Hong Kongers supported unification. (See the reference.)

In other words, the parents of the recent protesters gave Hong Kong to Beijing and, consequently, ensured that it will impose Chinese authoritarianism on Hong Kong in perpetuity.

Get more info about this issue.

Last edited 1 year ago by M. M.
M. M.
M. M.
1 year ago

Etan Smallman wrote, “In 2020, following a wave of pro-democracy protests, China imposed a draconian new security law on Hong Kong. … Hundreds of activists and former opposition lawmakers have since been arrested.”

For many decades before the handover of Hong Kong in 1997, the Hong Kongers had been aware of the atrocities committed by the mainland Chinese. Yet, the majority of Hong Kongers in 1997 still supported placing Hong Kong under the rule of Beijing. For most Hong Kongers, Chinese nationalism is more important than human rights or democracy.

Westerners should not waste a drop of blood nor treasure on helping the Chinese in Hong Kong or the rest of China.

If the Chinese genuinely support human rights and democracy, China would already be a Western nation. No foreign power is imposing the current brutal authoritarian government on China. This government exists because the majority of Chinese support it.

Furthermore, in 1997, most Hong Kongers favored (1) unification with China and the concomitant strangulation of human rights over (2) independence as the Republic of Hong Kong and the concomitant guarantee of human rights that they enjoyed under British rule. Indeed, on the day of the handover, millions of Hong Kongers celebrated in public parties. For most Hong Kongers, Chinese nationalism is more important than human rights or democracy. The Chinese (in Hong Kong and elsewhere) differ greatly from the Europeans.

In 1997, a poll by CNN indicated that 60% of Hong Kongers supported unification. (See the reference.)

In other words, the parents of the recent protesters gave Hong Kong to Beijing and, consequently, ensured that it will impose Chinese authoritarianism on Hong Kong in perpetuity.

Get more info about this issue.

Last edited 1 year ago by M. M.
Rob C
Rob C
1 year ago

1000 immigrants in a year’s time out of 5.2 million eligible doesn’t sound like the Hong Kongers are terribly concerned about PRC rule, does i?

William McKinney
William McKinney
1 year ago
Reply to  Rob C

1,000 in South Gloucestershire. Clearly the UK figure is very significantly higher. They are also leaving in droves for Canada and Australia, both of which – for some reason – are seen as preferred to the UK.

William McKinney
William McKinney
1 year ago
Reply to  Rob C

1,000 in South Gloucestershire. Clearly the UK figure is very significantly higher. They are also leaving in droves for Canada and Australia, both of which – for some reason – are seen as preferred to the UK.

Rob C
Rob C
1 year ago

1000 immigrants in a year’s time out of 5.2 million eligible doesn’t sound like the Hong Kongers are terribly concerned about PRC rule, does i?

james boo
james boo
1 year ago

I would be greatly surprised if the Chinese immigrant community is under surveillance in Bradley Stoke. Bradley Stoke is heavily inhabited by MoD civil servants working at Abbey Wood. Also Bradley Stoke is in South Gloucester not Bristol.

Last edited 1 year ago by james boo
D Glover
D Glover
1 year ago
Reply to  james boo

Do these MOD civil servants speak fluent Cantonese, and do they hang around the Tai Chi class all evening? These HK immigrants are living in a parallel world to us.
The article includes the quote  “I think 70% of them actually can’t understand English”


Doug Pingel
Doug Pingel
1 year ago
Reply to  D Glover

The quote “I think 70% of them actually can’t understand English” was about a supposed spy or informer.

D Glover
D Glover
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug Pingel

True. But if it were only the spies that can’t speak English it would be easy to filter them out.
What kind of secret service uses spies without language skills, anyway?

Last edited 1 year ago by D Glover
D Glover
D Glover
1 year ago
Reply to  Doug Pingel

True. But if it were only the spies that can’t speak English it would be easy to filter them out.
What kind of secret service uses spies without language skills, anyway?

Last edited 1 year ago by D Glover
james boo
james boo
1 year ago
Reply to  D Glover

Wild stab in the dark here but people’s whose day job is strategic nuclear weapons and Chinese intelligence gathering might get a reaction. I rather regret that I thought the unherd readership was capable objective thought. Clearly things need to put simply for the hard of thinking

Doug Pingel
Doug Pingel
1 year ago
Reply to  D Glover

The quote “I think 70% of them actually can’t understand English” was about a supposed spy or informer.

james boo
james boo
1 year ago
Reply to  D Glover

Wild stab in the dark here but people’s whose day job is strategic nuclear weapons and Chinese intelligence gathering might get a reaction. I rather regret that I thought the unherd readership was capable objective thought. Clearly things need to put simply for the hard of thinking

Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago
Reply to  james boo

P.S.

In North Korea anyone suspected of being a wrong thinker has their whole family sent to a concentration camp for life, old and young. China may not be quite that (except in Xinjiang Province) but they have the monitoring of every individual as an actual Mania – and the people back home would likely get really bad marks on their Social Credit Score if these ones in UK said anything.

D Glover
D Glover
1 year ago
Reply to  james boo

Do these MOD civil servants speak fluent Cantonese, and do they hang around the Tai Chi class all evening? These HK immigrants are living in a parallel world to us.
The article includes the quote  “I think 70% of them actually can’t understand English”


Jonas Moze
Jonas Moze
1 year ago
Reply to  james boo

P.S.

In North Korea anyone suspected of being a wrong thinker has their whole family sent to a concentration camp for life, old and young. China may not be quite that (except in Xinjiang Province) but they have the monitoring of every individual as an actual Mania – and the people back home would likely get really bad marks on their Social Credit Score if these ones in UK said anything.

james boo
james boo
1 year ago

I would be greatly surprised if the Chinese immigrant community is under surveillance in Bradley Stoke. Bradley Stoke is heavily inhabited by MoD civil servants working at Abbey Wood. Also Bradley Stoke is in South Gloucester not Bristol.

Last edited 1 year ago by james boo