I grew up in the 1970s in the quaint English city of Hereford, where our suburban house was near to the fine medieval cathedral. At least once a month, during my childhood, I would step inside the cathedral, to look, in particular, at one perplexing feature: all the statues without faces. Because the cathedral was full of them: from the blanked out 12th century figures dancing around the font, to the noble effigies of knights and bishops, their stone heads brutally hacked in half.
As a small boy, I had no idea what I was looking at, though I knew it disturbed me. Why erase human faces, on precious and historic artworks? It didn’t make any sense, but now, of course, I know that I was encountering a famous moment of iconoclasm: the mutilation of “idolatrous” Catholic monuments in the spiritual fires of the Reformation.
Today, sitting in my flat in London, I have been looking — once more perplexed and disturbed — at another iconoclasm (the word comes from the Greek: eikon, or image, and klaster, breaker): the toppling of statues around the western world, from Christopher Columbus in Virginia to Edward Colston in Bristol to King Leopold II in Antwerp. The latest vandalisation involved Italian journalist Indro Montanelli, and more is surely to follow.
As I write, this contemporary Iconoclasm of the Woke seems to be accelerating, particularly in Britain. There is a website advising the Topplers where else they might chuck statuary in rivers: maybe Sir Francis Drake in Plymouth, or Captain James Cook in Teesside. And it’s not just statues, for the New Iconoclasts are targeting street names, movies, sitcoms, art: one particular target, much lusted after by the Topplers, is the Winston Churchill mural in Croydon (a borough heavily bombed in the Blitz). At the weekend the threats of further iconoclasm, in particular against the image of Britain’s wartime leader, lead to large numbers of ‘statue defenders’ turning up in central London.
Where will this bizarre fury end, and how might it change us: as nations, cultures, peoples? To get an answer you need to examine iconoclasms through history, and in a lifetime of travel I have visited the scenes of several.
The earliest known iconoclasm took place at the awesomely venerable site of Gobekli Tepe, in Kurdish Turkey, a grandiose sequence of megalithic circles, constructed, it is believed, by hunter-gatherers just after the end of the Ice Age (around 11,000BC). Gobekli Tepe presents many profound mysteries, but one of the deepest is this: why, in 8,000BC, did the presumed builders erase their own magnificent monument, by entombing it with tons of dust, a task which might have taken decades?
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThere is a simple explanation.
Boredom and spoilt people who are not confronted. Its their idea of fun.
I kind of think that sums it up best of all. Kids caught up unquestioning in the propaganda, and media-generated hype, and feeling all warm and cosy about being good little activis.
Short and sagacious.
Toddlers gonna toddle.
This is a welcome dose of reality and common sense. The current frenzy of statue-toppling – captured and re-directed by a small but vociferous minority of far-leftist ideologues – is neither acceptable nor healthy for a democratic society based on the rule of law. None of it is any longer (if it ever was) spontaneous or related in any meaningful sense to what happened in the USA. It is now a deliberate assault on our society, consciously intended to impose an anti-Western, anti-British prejudice which is not shared by the overwhelming majority of people in this country. It is deeply disturbing that so many of those in responsible positions (e.g. the police in Bristol, the mayor of London) are encouraging this dreadful vigilantism. Were they equally approving of violent iconoclasm when the Taliban destroyed so many of the cultural attracts of the Middle East?
The media are playing a leading role in NZ. One person researches a street name and TV arrive or you read “calls are increasing” when the media are doing the increasing. The media only do that with causes they support.
Jon Haidt says people unite around sacred symbols and ideas. Statues would come into that category.
“I am now very pessimistic,” Haidt said. “I think there is a very good chance American democracy will fail, that in the next 30 years we will have a catastrophic failure of our democracy.
“The current political civil war is between two groups of educated white people with radically different views about what the country is, what morality is and what we need to do to move forward.
“Most Americans are non-political, but in the age of social media they have become like dark matter. The modern civil war is being fought by the extremes.”
Haidt’s thesis originates with humans’ evolutionary journey. He says the “human mind is prepared for tribalism” and that humans are “deeply intuitive creatures whose gut feelings drive strategic reasoning.”
The delusion is to believe that liberal, secular, multicultural democracy is a natural condition for human nature. Haidt says this is false. The achievement of our democratic model based on diversity is a “miracle” that is far more fragile than we realise.
He warns that the mixture of social media, eruption of common enemy identity politics, and entrenched rival moralities of progressives and conservatives is provoking a reversion to tribalism.
“We just don’t know what a democracy looks like when you drain all the trust out of the system,” Haidt said.
His 2012 book The Righteous Mind identified the moral conflict now undermining the culture.
The progressive/conservative struggle is turning into a perceived conflict between good and bad people, the sure path to greater division and breakdown.
In NZ to accommodate a treaty with Maori we are officially bicultural (neolithic and modern) plus multicutural This means up Maori and down “Pakeha” (British settler who developed the nation) so migrants from all over can feel at home.
We have a very narrowly focused news media. I was just watching a discussion about Gramsci’s march through the institutions on Sky Australia. You wouldn’t get that on our television.
Rome as the Goths and Visigoths pour in.
Hard not to make that connection…
It is not Just the Killing of G.floyd, If you try to explain to Youngsters or Academics Why you think Globalists economics is Exploitive, ”Climate Change” is a myth by Co2 ,Climate is affected primarily by Solar winds, Volcanoes erupting, Massive meteorites ,like 65million years ago causing Tsunamis ,and end to Dinosaurs, You will be Shouted down or Snarled at,even in Political hustings!..As for Statues they should be Left as Monuments to Good and bad history,follies etc…
What worries me about this trend is the amount of self-hatred running deep under the surface. When you hate yourself, and cannot forgive yourself how can you love and forgive the other?
The thought of the relationship between the Khmer Rouge and Isis and their statue destruction had occurred to me but this article put things together so well. Thanks.
Mmmh, I am not so sure, at least in the UK, the current rise against the statues is such a bad thing. I think it is probably time we start reassessing our past, children should know what has happened between the Tudors and WWI. WWII was not necessarily only a glorious page and the bombing of Dresden certainly was not. The partition of India was a catastrophe and if it was not for Churchill, there were good chances Britain would have sided with the Third Reich. Robert Clive was cruel and empire building cost a lot of unnecessary suffering. And decolonisation was not neat and often was done in shambolic disorderly ways at the cost of long, still unresolved, civil conflicts.
Your exotic pseudonym leads one to think you maybe of Italian origin, which would explain, but not excuse, your obviously biased view of the British Empire.
However to better things first. You are quite correct, our current state education system, particularly as regards History is a national disgrace.
Now to take your points in reverse order.
The dismantling of the British Empire was a magnificent achievement compared to that all other European powers. Just look at how the French behaved in Indo-China and Algeria, the Dutch in what is now called Indonesia, and the beastly Belgium’s in the Congo, and last but least the shambolic Portuguese. All them involved huge human cost in blood and treasure. Yet by comparative analysis the British retreat from Empire was mercifully benign. Yes, there were number of colourful campaigns, in Palestine, Malaya,Cyprus,Kenya, Brunei, and Aden, but overall the casualties were light and the damage minimal.
The British Empire was the greatest Empire the world has seen since Ancient Rome. Look up what George Santayana had to say about it in 1922.
Yes there was cruelty and suffering, but overall the benefits far outweighed the
horrors. If you seek for real horror, look to German South West Africa, the Belgium Congo and the with special reference to yourself, the bestial conquest of Ethiopia by Italy.
In India for example, for every Robert Clive there were hundreds of dedicated Civil Servants who dragged India, kicking and squealing from medieval barbarism to the reasonably benign democracy it is today. Nothing illustrates this better than the barbarism that erupted on our departure over partition. The ‘Indians’ resorted to their traditional habits once the restraining hand of the Raj was removed. You might say we should stayed longer, but in 1947, bankrupt, the Atlee government and the Demos clamouring for the NHS, our time was truly up.
We would not have sided with the Third Reich but for Churchill. Where did you read that? However it would have been sensible to have remained neutral and allowed the behemoths to fight it out without us.
David Irving made his debut as an historian by writing about the bombing of Dresden and unfortunately massively exaggerated the fatalities, thus mythologising the event. However even as late as February 1945, Dresden was a perfectly legitimate military target.
Now I suspect you have been drinking from the well of Marxism, and this all might come as a bit of shock, but now is the time for serious study, particularly in Lockdown.
I would start with Ethiopia, you may enjoy that.
Marxism-shmarxism: you seem to be protesting a tad too much. Ask any of the people from the countries you name what they thought of british occupation/rule. Colonialism in all its forms is terrible, and the British are as guilty as anyone. You don’t need to point out that others were worse.
You must have misunderstood me, I’m not protesting, I’m eulogising the British Empire and its astonishing achievements.
I have traveled extensively across numerous former British colonies and have invariably received the same answer to the question “what was it like under the British?”. The answer is/was along the lines of, “Pretty good, but why did you abandon us to these thugs?” Sadly that is a very difficult question to answer as I’m sure you would agree?
When describing decolonisation, it is essential that you use comparative analysis, and therefore, quite correct to differentiate between good and bad. Thus it is imperative to highlight those who have performed atrociously. Why you should state that “you don’t need to point out that others were worse”, is beyond me.
Finally, stating that “Colonisation in all its forms is terrible “, is just socialist tosh, the tired old mantra from a failed ideology.
You should read Santayana, not Marx, you will find him far more enjoyable.
Thanks for sorting out the second woker.
Thanks for sorting out the woker.
I do believe it is more simple that all of this and that the history of destruction is also more simple. People are upset and frustrated to start with due to all the restrictions on their normal lives, they are also very frightened of what they face in the future, poverty, debt ‘the new normal’. On top of this they saw a man savagely murdered by those that are supposed to protect. All it took was one infiltrator who had been told by those above to stir the crowd into a frenzy and be told what was required.
But the man murdered wasn’t killed in Britain, where the proximate cause of the killing of black people is other black people, in drug fuelled gang killings. Operation Trident attempts to combat this black on.l black killing. Blacks are overrepresented by a factor of almost 4 among both murder victims and suspects.
I suspect that the killing if George Floyd was, to your point, exacerbated by the frustrations of lockdown. The weather is pleasant. The violence has doubtless been seized on by political extremists for their own ends. They are looking for trouble and should, in my view, find it. The job of the police is to maintain law and order. The law proscribes meetings of more than a handful, while respecting social distancing. Instead of the police fleeing the mob, it should, after a summons to disperse has been ignored, be the other way around.
Yes the police must do their job. The mob fuelled by a snivelling spineless media have any whim of the week excuse to cause mayhem. This latest assault on our British way of life is not acceptable. BLM and BAME are a very tenuous excuse to attack anything that yob’s can get away with. We could bite back by having Draconian sentences for those spitting on Law and Order. Key point this week; virtually none of the sub-culture cretins out acting illegally would know a fig about the statues they demand to be removed.
“where the proximate cause of the killing of black people is other black people” The same is true in the USA. Blacks are 54% of murder perpetrators, but 13% of the population, in the most recent data we have, and the majority of those murders are black on black. Which tends to increase when BLM has it’s way, unfortunately. Crime is going to rise across the USA.
one Agent Provocateur infiltrating and corrupting out innocent youth who have been getting a little restive because of lock-down? Life is, I think a little more complex. The murder of George Floyd was not an isolated thing, these things happen in the US and, more often than not, the policeman is not found guilty. IN the Trump era (and before) we are seeing voter suppression (and mostly black voter suppression) in levels not seen since before the voting acts of the 1960s. The election of a black man as President seems almost to be a distraction now; there is a good book by an american writer, Michelle Alexander, called “the New Jim Crow”. Give it a read. The campaign to topple Colson and other public statues of people who profited well from the slave trade has been growing for years and quite right too
…..look at the data Richard, white police killing black people is the rarest category of all ! Afro-Americans remain on the lower economic rungs because the large US cities are neo-plantations, where Black people are required identify as perpetual victims and prevented from escaping by education and social policies imposed by their traditional masters in the Democratic Party.
Or maybe black people are behind in Africa for the same reason they are behind in the USA. Ask James Watson why and you’ll learn the truth and you’ll also learn why no academic has the balls to speak the truth. Because a Nobel prize won’t protect you from heresy trials to the new secular religion of the West.