Why has the death of a man across the Atlantic, at the hands of a police force equipped with immeasurably more guns than our own, in a country with a very different history of race relations, become a topic of such consuming interest in Britain? It is not as though the United States is the only superpower in which terrible things are currently happening.
Why, if people in Britain feel that they have a moral responsibility to march against Donald Trump, are they not also breaking the lockdown to protest the crushing of liberty in Hong Kong — a city that was, unlike America, a British colony as recently as 1997? Why, when the death of a black man in Minneapolis can provoke such anguish among minorities here, has the detention of a million Muslims in Xinjiang — and a systematic attempt by the Chinese government at cultural genocide — failed to provoke a matching storm?
Why, when China has come to rival the United States as an economic, a military, a geopolitical power, does the outside world continue to find America — Trump, racist cops, and all — so very much more interesting? What is it about the murder of George Floyd, in a year hardly lacking in tragedy and suffering, that has struck a chord so resonant that it has briefly toppled even coronavirus from the top of the news?
Britain has been in hock now to American narratives for at least a century. Sharing as we do a common language with Hollywood, we have always been readier than other nations to be seduced by its mythologies. Today, in an era of computer games and box sets, these mythologies have become more potent, more influential than ever. If it is true, as Bruno Maçães has brilliantly argued, that life in the United States today “continuously emphasises its own artificiality in a way that reminds participants that, deep down, they are experiencing a story”, then the challenge of disentangling fiction from reality becomes all the more difficult. The racist cop, the innocent victim, the violence-shadowed city: these are stories that we experience simultaneously as reports on the news and as series on Netflix.
Donald Trump, a malevolent huckster straight out of Gotham City, is a president perfectly in tune with these disorienting, disturbing times. He is not the only person, however, to have bent reality to his own purposes, moulding it to fashion a narrative in which, like Joker, he can then star as the hero. Dystopia in America is not merely an expression of cultural pessimism. It is also — be it in the form of movies, TV shows or computer games — a brilliantly successful consumer product. That the streets of New York and Los Angeles currently resemble scenes from science fiction as much as they do TV footage from 1968 enables anyone taking to them to feel that they are entering a narrative with its own internal grammar, its own teleology. Fighting evil, sticking it to the bad guys, taking on a super-villain: who would not want to be part of such a story?
Yet if we in Britain feel familiar with America’s self-mythologising in a way that we do not with those of any other country, it is clear that there is more to the motivation of those who marched through London and Manchester this week than a longing — Cliff Richard-like — to feel themselves part of something bigger and more compelling. There are stories older than HBO, older than Hollywood, older even than the United States itself, that are part of the common heritage of Britain and America: stories that continue to shape the assumptions and ideals of both.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeThe people who have been forgotten in all this is the real Americans – the Native Americans who have been murdered, driven out of their land, deliberately infected with disease, denied economic resources and more, over several hundred years. Only those groups with casinos or mineral wealth are even keeping their heads above water. But because they are in remote rural areas not the big cities they are out of sight, out of mind.
They are even being left out of the CV statistics. https://www.theguardian.com…
Red Lives apparently don’t matter at all.
These so-called “real Americans” are no more “real” Americans than I am. We all had ancestors who came from somewhere else. Those of us born here (and my antecedents have all been here well before the War to Separate from Britain) are “real” Americans. Anyone thinking otherwise are foolish or playing a “race” card.
You are correct there are, nor never have been any “real Americans”.
However those whom I call Red Indians, RI, (I’m too old and grumpy to use the term Native Americans), did somehow cross the Bering Strait some fifteen thousand years or seven hundred and fifty generations ago. It is fairly obvious from their physiognomy that they originated from Asia.
By contrast your antecedents having possibly left bucolic Suffolk, crossed the Atlantic and hit the beach, let us say four hundred years or twenty generations ago.
Arriving first however does not entitle one to eternal ownership, that has to be defended and fought for.
In the event, as is well known, the RI failed the Darwinian test, and were comprehensively defeated. Vae victis as the Romans said, woe to the conquered!
The whole of human history has been thus, from when ‘we’ first crawled out of the primeval slime and later emerged from the Neanderthal Valley. Our first instinct, besides breeding was killing.
After the last seventy rather benign years the ‘the drum begins to beat’ and all Americans must ready for the inevitable challenge ahead, if you get my meaning?
I think the Darwinian test is all about the strongest in nature and not the difference between the gattlin gun and a bow and a few arrows, it had nothing to do it’s Darwin and everything to do with greed, you must be white as I don’t think any blacks would speak of benign years.
The strongest invariably have the best weapons, it was ever thus.
Blacks certainly have a raw deal, but nature isn’t a charity.
You have make the best of what you have, and don’t allow envy and bitterness to destroy you, as so many are at this moment.
Do you really think you would get a better deal from those wonderful, cuddly people, the Chinese? If so, you had better start practising the kow tow.
I totally agree, so when will that stupid wall come down. We don’t to be accused of playing the race card.
Dear John, i could not agree more with your comments on the Native Americans and thank you for making them. It is a very sad situation that whatever group in society has the most power it is usually at the expense of another group. I have no answers but just profoundly depressed at the future of humanity.
Dear Debra, I also have no answers but am just profoundly depressed at the past of humanity too.
Red lives are victim to an insatiable quest of past generations of colonial expansionists, explorers, and prospectors. But just like black lives, they are also victim to an overcorrection by later generations which stole their self-reliability, initiative, and made many helplessly reliant on the state.
Why is suicide and poverty so high in red communities? It certainly has something to do with the fact that prior generations of leaders felt guilty, and tried to pay penance for their sins by segregating them into reservations and putting them on paltry government payouts.
Rights and responsibilities have to sit in balance with each other. Not only did we steal their rights, but just like the black community, we tried to correct it by inventing new rights that only stole their self-ownership and responsibilities and threw them into a cycle of poverty and crime.
It’s so cliche, but there’s a reason it’s better to teach someone to fish than to keep handing them some. First Nations should not have been cast into isolation to “go about their Indian business”. They should have been taught how to “fish” in the new world, as unjust as it may have been that this new world was thrust upon them without consent.
The Christianity legacy framing may give some hope and others a place to lay the blame. At what point in time and by which criteria would a sociopolitical movement be considered alien or post-Christian? The demonstrators motivations appear to have more foundation in the sociopolitical brainwashing that has been infused into academia and conditioning by celebrity and media culture than residual Christianity.
Balderdash. Horrywood and those who are actors there, are no more based in reality than the made up drivel most put out on screens. They are of the same ilk as other elitist libs. Heads up their okoles to the point of destroying their “leetle gray cells”.
You’re the only one with your finger on the pulse eh?
Yes, but his breathing only takes place within his own matrix.
Dearest Billy boy, spoken like a true Brit, of course your idea of reality doesn’t hold a drop of water, and your taste is a typical English taste, not British..so balderdash to you old cheese. Hoping you will leave your little bubble some time in the future.
“Greatest Story Ever Told” – No hyperbole there at all. And a bit blasphemous to apply that phrase from the title of a film about the life of Christ to America.
As for protesting Chinese actions against Hong Kong or the Uighers. Well, that might be considered “racist” according to SJW canons, since the perps aren’t white. Much easier and PC to hate whitey and America (even as these same protesters – as Europeans have done over a century of abandonment of their own cultural traditions, high and low – imbibe the worst dregs of American pop culture in the music they listen to, the movies they watch, the clothes they wear. etc.).
“Donald Trump, a malevolent huckster straight out of Gotham City, is a president perfectly in tune with these disorienting, disturbing times. He is not the only person, however, to have bent reality to his own purposes, moulding it to fashion a narrative in which, like Joker, he can then star as the hero. ”
So how does Tom Holland get to violate the rules about commenting when his comments would be removed if I applied them to him?
Having marched on Washington with MLK Jr. in 1963, he was the opposite of the current “leaders” of the civil rights movement who have a record of starting race riots and dividing the country based upon the color of our skin. We marched while racist Democrats like Senator Gore ( Al Jr’s father) and William Fulbright ( Bill Clinton’s mentor) and Robert Byrd ( Hillary’s mentor) fought our march and the Civil Rights Act we finally were able to get passed with a greater percentage of Republicans than Democrats voting for it.
The vast majority of Americans were united in condemning the four officers who killed a black man whose life consisted of violent crimes against society. The irony being that the officers were the demanded squad of diversity with one White, one Black, one Hispanic and one Asian. Now everyone in the country is guilty of “systemic racism” when the reality is that the majority of deaths and crime are committed in Democrat strongholds where “leaders” are elected time after time despite their proven failures. There have been hundreds of black people murdered by black people every month for decades, but not a single march for them since their lives really don’t matter to the people who say all black live matter.
I’m not sure I understood what Tom Holland is trying to say here. I re-read the article and it’s nicely written and I always like a Bible story. Please tell me if I’m wrong, but is the conclusion that somehow there’s some collective guilt here? And therefore we’ve all got to atone for it? Because if that’s what is being said, I really, really most strongly disagree.
He is noticing the underlying historical pattern of Human behaviour. He does this through his book, Dominion. But i don’t know if he is espousing collective guilt or just articulating his observation……………….. That being said, by reading his book, he does not seem like much of an activist, more just an eagle-eyed journalist/historian.
Thanks for telling us your story of America, Mr. Holland. It’s all very entertaining and some of it has the added virtue of actually being true.
Dr. King said that men should be judged by the content of their character not by the colour of their skin. BLM etc betray Dr. King
I, a white man, am assumed, by people to who have never met me, to be a racists and beneficiary of ” white privilege”. Dr. King must be turning in his grave.
Tom Holland is right that the intersectional/critical race theory crowd
are a religious movement. Wrong that it has anything to do with
Christianity, except as a heretical parody. Christianity is a religion
of grace. The cutural Marxist’s religion is one of works. Not works to
please God, of course, but to signal their virtue to their cronies. This
aspect goes back beyond Marx, of course. Denunciations of friends and family (now becoming common in the twittersphere) were an essential part of the French Revolution too. Like Robespierre, terror and lawlessness are esteemed as an emanation of their virtue, so the devastation of American cities is no surprise. Sadly, as Danton said at his trial, revolutions devour their own children.
In this febrile atmosphere of grievance glory milennialism, it is not surprising that the murder of Black Africans by Black Muslim jihadis goes un-challenged by a suppressed media and entrenched educational ignorance.
All media work us over completely. They are so pervasive in their personal, political, economic, aesthetic, psychological, moral, ethical, and social consequences that they leave no part of us untouched, unaffected, unaltered. The medium is the message. Any understanding of social and cultural change is impossible without a knowledge of the way media work as environments.
Marshall Mcluhan
Agree 100%. Edward Bernays was the most influential man of the last 100 years!!! The Media and their propaganda controls almost everything. They are the most powerful