by Amy Jones
Friday, 5
November 2021
Debate
10:15

The NHS vaccine mandates aren’t what they seem

The Government is — once again — trying to nudge us
by Amy Jones
Clap the carers has become sack the carers.

Two developments on vaccines in the NHS in quick succession. First, the news that the Government intends to force NHS staff to have both a Covid vaccine and a flu jab or risk losing their jobs. Then, the announcement that it won’t kick in until… April!

At first sight, this simply seems like bad and nonsensical policy.

It has the potential to wreak havoc on an already stretched service. Despite a record uptake, around 25% of NHS staff did not have a flu jab last year; add to that the 116,000 NHS workers who have not yet had a Covid jab, and this has the potential to affect hundreds of thousands of employees.

There has been little discussion about why healthcare workers may be declining vaccination and barely any consideration as to what their motives may be. For those declining the Covid jab, there is also little analysis of whether they have previously been infected. Estimates vary on how many NHS staff have caught Covid (accurate figures are not produced), but it is likely to be in the order of hundreds of thousands.

Even if it was to be brought in instantly, there are many practical reasons as to why a Covid and Flu vaccine mandate would be flawed: it risks discriminating against BAME employees and it can even make the vaccine hesitant less likely to be vaccinated. The common claim that such a requirement would be equivalent to Hep B vaccines is also incorrect, as I outlined here before.

But the fact that its introduction is being delayed until April makes it stranger still. Repeatedly, we have been told that the NHS is on the cusp of its busiest winter ever. And yet, this vaccine mandate only kicks in from April onwards, months after the busiest period. So if the argument is that the vaccine mandate is needed to make the NHS safe, then why is it not necessary it over our busiest winter? And if it is not needed, why coerce staff into getting the vaccine in the first place?

There is, of course, another explanation. Rather like the vaccine passports in settings like nightclubs, that were due to be brought in at the end of September but were then abandoned last minute, the timetabling of these measures gives the Government the chance — the hope, for some cabinet ministers — that it never need actually happen. If the Covid situation is better by then, coercive measures like these can be set aside. In the meantime, it acts as yet another “nudge”, a distant threat to try to get more NHS employees vaccinated.

I’m not a fan of “nudging” as it is coercive, dishonest, goes against basic principles of public health, and risks seriously damaging our trust in authorities. However in this case I’m hoping that’s what it ends up being. The alternative, stripping away the rights of the staff of an organisation that already suffers from a toxic culture, in which a quarter of the staff say they have already been bullied and harassed and three quarters have already said they are considering leaving, is too self-destructive to contemplate.

Join the discussion


  • I like it, it’s progressive thinking as lockdowns should have been. It’s clever but if the goal post has shifted, all the better for the ones like me who don’t want a vaccine. Thus the responsibility has been passed to each individual to make their choice.
    Besides individual responsibility & choice, we now have a drug for Covid . That’s what was needed in the first place . Not the vaccine. Covid vaccines will hopefully become redundant.
    Hence with advent of time, Covid will pass, fear mongering will retreat and hopefully lessons will be learnt i.e ‘look before you leap’ & try not be sheep.

  • I agree with your analysis generally, all I’m pointing out is that while it was a dead cert that Nudge Theory would be ruined by its harnessing to the State, in itself it is not a harmful or malicious set of ideas.

  • In the context of this article specifically, it must surely be obvious that any government edict amounting to “Do what you’re told or you lose your job” is nowhere close to a nudge, and is actually a wholly authoritarian iron fist pounding individual liberty to death.
    This. Exactly. Perhaps not a nudge but an overt shove?

  • To get involved in the discussion and stay up to date, become a registered user.

    It's simple, quick and free.

    Sign me up