by Niall Gooch
Monday, 22
June 2020

Junipero Serra, the latest target for progressives

The Catholic saint represented an older world hated by today's Left
by Niall Gooch
The toppled Juniperro Serra statue in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco

The latest casualty of the wave of iconoclasm that is sweeping the US has been the statue of the Franciscan mission priest Junipero Serra in Golden Gate Park, San Francisco. Serra, who was recognised as a saint by the Catholic Church in 2015, has been called the Apostle of California for his evangelistic work there in the eighteenth century, when the area was still under the control of Spain.

Serra seems to have been an incredibly driven and hard-working individual, with a reputation as a scholar and ascetic. He established numerous missions across what is now Mexico and the United States, despite suffering chronic health problems. Altogether he spent more than thirty years spreading the Catholic faith in the Americas, a calling for which he had abandoned a promising career in the Spanish church. His canonisation ceremony, presided over by Pope Francis during his visit to the USA in 2015, featured Catholics from Native American backgrounds.

The controversy over the honour paid to Serra seems to arise from both particular and general concerns about his work. Critics highlight the apparent frequent use of corporal punishment and physical restraint of native Californians who worked at the Catholic missions overseen by him. More widely, Serra and others like him are seen as complicit in the injustices and violence of Spanish colonialism. Although Serra himself often clashed with the military authorities over their brutality towards the indigenous population, and urged clemency when some of them burnt down a mission, it is understandable that the Catholic missions are still viewed with a certain ambiguity by some present-day Native Americans. The effect of European settlement on their way of life and their culture was catastrophic.

But the question remains how much of the antagonism to Serra and others like him is sincere and well-founded, and how much of it is part of a simplistic campaign of vilification of those wicked Dead White Men who represent the old Western civilisation so hated by modern first world progressives.

Nevertheless, it can be uncomfortable for modern-day Christians to reflect on the extent to which the spread of the faith in certain places was not only accompanied, but arguably enabled, by especially rapacious and cruel forms of imperial expansion. As a Christian, I find it hard to regret the fact that Christianity has reached almost every corner of the Earth, but we ought to be honest in how we reflect on some of the means by which this has been achieved.

Join the discussion

  • Why the surprise that even the best of us have flaws? Can we be confident that future generations won’t disagree with what we think is good now?

  • Even the best, indeed, have flaws – surely Christianity has made that point more assertively than any other value system:

    “When Christ at a symbolic moment was establishing His great society, He chose for its cornerstone neither the brilliant Paul nor the mystic John, but a shuffler, a snob, a coward ““ in a word, a man. And upon this rock He has built His Church, and the gates of Hell have not prevailed against it. All the empires and the kingdoms have failed, because of this inherent and continual weakness, that they were founded by strong men and upon strong men. But this one thing, the historic Christian Church, was founded on a weak man, and for that reason it is indestructible. For no chain is stronger than its weakest link.” – G.K. Chesterton

  • Boko Haram in Nigeria regard the mass murder of their Christian neighbours as legitimate because they were converted by missionaries and evangelists in previous centuries.

    If you start saying there is some reason to feel ‘uncomfortable’ about Christian missionary work being culturally insensitive, you just end up with the high speed abolition of Christianity and give permission to the Marxists, who are behind this, to do what Marxists have always done to Christians.

    We cannot afford to be complex and nuanced and sophisticated in this game. We have to defend our Christian heritage warts and all, or we will see the return of mass murder, not just iconoclasm and scapegoating.

  • To get involved in the discussion and stay up to date, become a registered user.

    It's simple, quick and free.

    Sign me up