December 8, 2022 - 7:00am

Another week, another corporate shindig for Sir Keir Starmer. Today, somewhere amid Canary Wharf’s gleaming towers, the Labour leader and his shadow cabinet colleagues will be centre stage at “a full-day conference for business leaders”, Private Eye reports. The main sponsors are HSBC and the energy company SSE; also helping out with the costs are a couple of lobbying firms. Well, when you start driving many of Labour’s most passionate activists out of the party, you need all the cash you can get.

That said, Labour’s money troubles may soon be a thing of the past. Starmer’s reconciliation with big business, and in particular with the City of London, is well underway. “Private parties have been thrown for Starmer and deputy leader Angela Rayner in many of London’s prestigious neighbourhoods,” Bloomberg reported recently, while “City solicitor Ian Rosenblatt […] said that Labour was now collecting money hand over fist from business people.”

Starmer’s public comments — on trans issues, trade unions, Brexit, immigration, nationalisation — tend to be composed of fudge, self-contradiction and ambiguity. But look at who he is courting and the direction of travel is clear. We are witnessing a sort of corporate takeover of the Labour Party.

The party’s conference this year, the Financial Times noted, was overrun with “gaggles of besuited lobbyists”. The New Statesman’s Kevin Maguire, attending a conference event for “City slickers”, suggested that the most significant development of the Starmer era might be the emergence of “Bankers for Labour”. Indeed, Starmer bragged that the conference had raised a record-breaking £1m from firms paying to run stalls. One of them was Deliveroo; gig economy firms, which you might naively assume are the antithesis of Labour’s philosophy, are increasingly entangled with the party, employing ex-staffers and donating event tickets worth thousands of pounds. Elsewhere, corporate lobbyists are being seconded to work in the offices of shadow cabinet members.

The innocent explanation for all this is that a Labour administration will have to govern for everyone, and so it ought to extend a Blair-like welcome to business and entrepreneurship. The City may not be perfect, but it is our economic powerhouse, keeping the pound strong, taxes flowing and a lot of people employed. A serious, grown-up government will invest in skills, industry and housebuilding, rather than picking fights with the country’s most successful firms.

And here is the less innocent explanation: that Starmer is uprooting any possibility of genuine economic reform. When he and his City spokeswoman Tulip Siddiq tell City AM that financial services have an exciting future if they can break away from “prescriptive” regulations, he is signalling that he wants more of the same. More London dominance, even if it syphons off money and energy from the rest of the country. More brain drain, whereby the smartest graduates are hoovered up by City firms. More private equity raids on British businesses, and more hollowing-out of crucial sectors like social care and council services through dubious profit-making schemes. More financialisation of land, even as the housing crisis deepens. More dodgy services for oligarchs, all while Britain’s role as an “everything haven” casts an increasingly sickly light over our national life. More risk-taking, despite what happened in 2008.

The best-case scenario for a Starmer government was outlined here a few months ago by Adrian Pabst: a Blue Labour administration, “economically radical and socially moderate”. But to be socially moderate would require standing up to the woke activists who, experience suggests, tend to get their way. As for economic radicalism, it may have just gone under in the chilly waters of Canary Wharf.


Dan Hitchens writes the newsletter ‘The Pineapple’ and is former editor of the Catholic Herald

ddhitchens