Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rasmus Fogh
Rasmus Fogh
1 year ago

Surely it is quite simple to be seen as ‘an artist in your own right’ and for people to forget you were ever somebody’s muse? All you have to do is to produce art that is unmistakably more original and profound than the man who launched your career. If you can, of course. Few people remember Tina Turner mainly as the partner of Ike.

Martin Bollis
Martin Bollis
1 year ago
Reply to  Rasmus Fogh

My thoughts exactly. I was trying to come up with an inverse relationship and all I could manage was Denis Thatcher.

Tina and Ike- spot on.

Rasmus Fogh
Rasmus Fogh
1 year ago
Reply to  Martin Bollis

I just remembered an even better one: Pierre and Marie Curie.

Johann Strauss
Johann Strauss
1 year ago
Reply to  Rasmus Fogh

Totally agree

AC Harper
AC Harper
1 year ago

I am strangely unbothered by these anecdotes. More famous for exploiting your beauty or nakedness (or being exploited) than your other abilities? Then the answer is in your hands.
The best advice I ever got was “If the pain of staying is greater than the pain of going, go.” Whether you are an employee moaning about your job, or a muse feeling underappreciated, or a stripper feeling degraded, if the pain of continuing is greater than the pain of doing something else, then do something else.

Fredrick Urbanelli
Fredrick Urbanelli
1 year ago

This article, like it’s predecessor on Picasso, is a light exercise in righteous if irrelevant wishful thinking. Surely, there are male artists who use, abuse and neglect the women in their lives. There is no shortage of either men or women who are guilty of this, whether they’re artists or not. But if any of the women cited above had produced work that was as extraordinary as that of the men mentioned in this piece, they would have recieved the attention they deserved. Especially today, when dealers and curators are “encouraged” to seek out women and minority artists to highlight in their expositions. Today’s art world is tepid and timid enough already without forcing the issues of social justice crusaders on it. Art is a matter of genius, not fairness or balance

Andrew D
Andrew D
1 year ago

There are very few (no?) female artists who can be put in the category of genius. Every day Radio 3 fulfills its quota of women composers, but the results, while usually perfectly pleasant, seldom really inspire. Same with women painters. Germaine Greer wrote a book on the subject (The Obstacle Race), blaming the patriarchy of course. How long can this argument be sustained? As you say, dealers and curators are everywhere being encouraged to seek out female talent, and lots of perfectly OK work comes forward as a result. But people without cervices remain the towering figures of art.

Last edited 1 year ago by Andrew D
Peter Francis
Peter Francis
1 year ago

Many thanks for this. I know so little about art, and even less about the lives of artists. Which prominent female artists had a male muse for substantial proportions of their careers? And was Lucian Freud being wilfully naive by taking Gwen’s words at face value?
I am currently reading “The Exhibitionist” by Charlotte Mendelson. So this piece has given me some real-world background to enhance my appreciation of the novel.

Last edited 1 year ago by Peter Francis
Drahcir Nevarc
Drahcir Nevarc
1 year ago

I can see that lady’s boobies.

Fredrick Urbanelli
Fredrick Urbanelli
1 year ago

What’s more, the author of this piece should realize that by lamenting the way that male artists have treated their muses, she is only drawing attention to the difference in quality of male vs. female artists. She’s doing the women no favors here.